We may have an instinctive skepticism of advertising, advice-giving, evangelizing, and other attempts to influence us. But how do we cultivate the ability to recognize and challenge dubious claims -- especially when those claims are based on "research"? (Nine out of ten doctors prefer. . .)
Huck and Sandler's book, first published in 1979, is an entertaining excursion into this territory. Using 100 sample cases, they first present and then deconstruct interpretations of research results ranging from studies by university professors to the lab experiments of popcorn-seller Orville Redenbacher.
Did outdoor advertising increase the name recognition of Miss America? Are intelligent people more likely to be "strange"? Does getting a free Whopper put you in a mood to help out someone else?
Maybe and maybe not. It depends on how you look at the test results. Huck and Sandler show the many ways that research methodology can skew results and the many ways that data can be interpreted and misinterpreted.
Take the time to puzzle over each sample case before looking at the authors' analysis. You will begin to sharpen your own abilities (maybe long dormant) to question the judgement of self-proclaimed experts and the tyranny of other people's statistics.