23 of 30 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
Dexter continues his Morse code!, 2 Mar 2002
This review is from: The Riddle of the Third Mile (Pan Crime) (Inspector Morse Mysteries) (Paperback)
It's certainly a crime of the most perplexing sort--so perplexing (and convoluted) that it
would take an Inspector Morse to separate the "facts" from "fiction"! In Colin Dexter's
Morse novel, one of a long series, the erswhile policeman finds himself "drowning" in a sea of clues,
lies, innuendos, red herrings.
A dismembered body is fished out of the Oxford Canal--only the torso remains and
Morse and Sergeant Lewis are up to the challenge. As if often the case, Oxford
University is involved. A don has disappeared, leaving about a plethora of clues. It's the
long and winding road down the halls of academe for the Thames Valley police and the
trail bounces back and forth to London and some of its seedier spots.
The scenario seems set with an opening scene out of World War II, when the
Gilbert brothers (local boys from the Oxford area) face the horrors of the battle of El
Alamein, the youngest of the three dieing. The company commander, a Lt. Browne-Smith
just happens now to be a don in question at Oxford.
Dexter pulls on punches as he permits Morse and Lewis to take on this
bizarre--certainly macabre--case. With his usual erudite style, the author's clever, at times
witty and ascerbic, plot and character development takes the reader for a great ride (and
read). Written in 1983, long before, one presumes, Dexter had envisioned Morse's demise
("The Remorseful Day"), "The Riddle of the Third Mile" is carefully orchestrated, with
the climactic results rushing in with a top crescendo! (The reader must be a bit careful as
the facts and events come almost as an onslaught!) The tone of this episode, despite its
shocking crime scenario, is one of greater levity than some of his later books ("The Wench
Is Dead," for instance),but it was written some 15 years before "Remorseful Day," and the
tone and atmosphere are naturally different. This one gives additional insight into Morse's
earlier (younger) days, of his stepping down from Oxford and of the first love of his life
(Morse is ever the eternal optimist when it comes to beautiful women!). Dexter also fills
this one with his usual literary allusions, clever references, and an incredible vocabulary
(probably only equated by Dame P.D. James or William Buckley, themselves!).
I found this one probably to be the most delightful and intriguing of the Morse series,
perhaps because of the levity he chooses to exhibit. Regardless, readers of the Morse code
will find this episode in fine keeping with the others. A good read!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No
1 of 7 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A bit bizarre but still a great story, 10 Aug 2009
This is another fine Inspector Morse mystery!
It starts off with a rather gruesome looking body fished out of the Oxford Canal. As the story strings along, you the reader become convinced that you know who the body is, or better was. But matters are not quite as easy as you think. There are plenty of clues all over the place and it takes a Chief Inspector Morse and a Sergeant Lewis - whose importance is growing - to separate the rubbish from the quality and come up with a credible `who is the corpse and how did it come about to be in this state and what is he doing in the Oxford Canal anyway'.
What I found a bit bizarre (or maybe unusual is a better word) is that there is a chap who has harboured a spot of hatred against one of the main characters in this book because of something that happened in Egypt in WWII and because of this hatred he sets up a scheme to trap the chap in question to take his revenge on him. Yet when they meet face to face that chap not only manages to talk the other guy out of taking his revenge but instead to use the same set-up to trap someone else.
I just find it unusual that someone harbours a specific hatred against someone else and builds it up for 40 years and then after having been given evidence by the object of his hatred that he was all wrong simply abandons his hatred without a second thought. To me that's a bit of a weak point in this book. You will have to read the book though to find out whether you agree or disagree with me.
But apart from the above point, this is a real page turner. I can only highly recommend it.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes
No