Thirty years after the 1994 Los Angeles earthquake killed his family, Lewis Crane has become the world's top seismologist, determined to protect people from his parent's fate. But in a world controlled by Chinese corporations and split by racist and religious strife, many don't want him to succeed.
| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. Learn more. |
Book Description
Product details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
More About the Authors
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.
Product Description
About the Author
Arthur C. Clarke was born in Minehead in 1917. During the Second World War he served as an RAF radar instructor, rising to the rank of Flight-Lieutenant. After the war he won a BSc in physics and mathematics with first class honours from King's College, London. One of the most respected of all science-fiction writers, he also won the KALINGA PRIZE, the AVIATION SPACE-WRITERS PRIZE,and the WESTINGHOUSE SCIENCE WRITING PRIZE. He also shared an OSCAR nomination with Stanley Kubrick for the screenplay of 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY, which was based on his story, 'The Sentinel'. He lived in Sri Lanka from 1956 until his death in 2008. To discover more about how the legacy of Sir Arthur is being honoured today, please visit http://www.clarkefoundation.org
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
By Mr. G. Battle
VINE™ VOICE
Format:Mass Market Paperback
Arthur C. Clarke and his co-authour did not set out to create a straight-forward book about a massive earthquake. The result here, is a complex futuristic book, conceived from many cultural and political strands, resulting in a thriller rather than an action novel. The characters are well created, and their subsequent relationships draw you in to the story and keep you turning the pages. The irony is, unfortunately, the earthquakes are a device to move the characters forwards. However, as damning as that sounds, the book contains well designed concepts, emotional impact and should keep you going through the half-century of time the novel follows. Just don't expect a major motion picture type book.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
By Big Ben
TOP 1000 REVIEWER
Format:Mass Market Paperback
A great plot, but patchy in its delivery. The plot has been detailed by others, so I'll spare you a repetition.
It meets one requirement for a great movie plot, too... "Start with an Earthquake, and build to a climax...."
The book starts with a series of earthquakes, and the plot moves along very snappily, until it gradually gets into politics...
Found that bit dragged on. But others clearly find it OK. Then it picks up again nearer the end, thankfully.
Well, that's how it seemed to me.
My boyhood hero the late Arthur C Clarke explains clearly that he _just_ did the plot synopsis, and the late Mike McQuay executed it (pretty competently, with caveats).
Clarke claims in his foreword to have read this book through - but I doubt that he did this carefully, since there are a couple of technical gaffes that spoil it for me. Things like a moon-skimmer that flies on fans. Fanning what, pray? Not a lot of air up there - good hard industrial vacuum. Stuff that we knew as kids in the 1950s - yes, I *was* a space cadet, and Arthur C Clarke was (as inventor of the geosynchronous communications satellite in the 1940s) one of our heroes. He would not have let this slip by, surely? Ah well. Age works its way with us all. Other slips include a large elevator using the earth's magnetic field - which is just not strong enough for the purpose.
Better for authors to ignore the science aspect if don't understand the schoolboy basics.
But it was readable, hence 3 stars. You might like it, even; but it was not for me.
It meets one requirement for a great movie plot, too... "Start with an Earthquake, and build to a climax...."
The book starts with a series of earthquakes, and the plot moves along very snappily, until it gradually gets into politics...
Found that bit dragged on. But others clearly find it OK. Then it picks up again nearer the end, thankfully.
Well, that's how it seemed to me.
My boyhood hero the late Arthur C Clarke explains clearly that he _just_ did the plot synopsis, and the late Mike McQuay executed it (pretty competently, with caveats).
Clarke claims in his foreword to have read this book through - but I doubt that he did this carefully, since there are a couple of technical gaffes that spoil it for me. Things like a moon-skimmer that flies on fans. Fanning what, pray? Not a lot of air up there - good hard industrial vacuum. Stuff that we knew as kids in the 1950s - yes, I *was* a space cadet, and Arthur C Clarke was (as inventor of the geosynchronous communications satellite in the 1940s) one of our heroes. He would not have let this slip by, surely? Ah well. Age works its way with us all. Other slips include a large elevator using the earth's magnetic field - which is just not strong enough for the purpose.
Better for authors to ignore the science aspect if don't understand the schoolboy basics.
But it was readable, hence 3 stars. You might like it, even; but it was not for me.
By R. B. Jones
Format:Hardcover
I bought this book because I'd read and enjoyed some of Clarke's earlier works like 2010: Odyssey II when I was a teenager.
The first disappointing thing about this book is that it's not actually written by Clarke at all, despite his name being emblazoned in inch-high lettering on the cover. All that Clarke did, as he explains in the introduction, is to write a 2 page plot outline, which he passed onto someone else because he was too lazy / untalented to write it himself. By the time you read this proviso, however, you've probably already shelled out the cover price and feeling short-changed.
Second, McQuay's prose is in an awful Americanised style, full of 2D stock characters, and transparently written with the intention on being converted into a Hollywood action thriller so they can make a ton of money. Hardly high literature. Science fiction writers trying to do characterisation never worked anyway, and it misses the point.
Third, the "science" behind the book is woefully inaccurate. At least Michael Crichton meticulously researched the genetics content of Jurassic Park: it had a basis in reality, was thought-provoking and you could learn something from it. Richter 10, on the other hand, is pure trashy fantasy. Clarke knows less about geology and earthquakes than the average GCSE student, and clearly didn't do any research before the afternoon he cobbled together his plot outline. For instance, he envisages California being split off from mainland America after a particularly large quake... when the San Andreas fault is actually a strike-slip boundary which only involves sideways motion, rather than extension, so this could never happen.
In summary, then, it's a terrible read, with no interesting science, and Clarke didn't even write it.
The first disappointing thing about this book is that it's not actually written by Clarke at all, despite his name being emblazoned in inch-high lettering on the cover. All that Clarke did, as he explains in the introduction, is to write a 2 page plot outline, which he passed onto someone else because he was too lazy / untalented to write it himself. By the time you read this proviso, however, you've probably already shelled out the cover price and feeling short-changed.
Second, McQuay's prose is in an awful Americanised style, full of 2D stock characters, and transparently written with the intention on being converted into a Hollywood action thriller so they can make a ton of money. Hardly high literature. Science fiction writers trying to do characterisation never worked anyway, and it misses the point.
Third, the "science" behind the book is woefully inaccurate. At least Michael Crichton meticulously researched the genetics content of Jurassic Park: it had a basis in reality, was thought-provoking and you could learn something from it. Richter 10, on the other hand, is pure trashy fantasy. Clarke knows less about geology and earthquakes than the average GCSE student, and clearly didn't do any research before the afternoon he cobbled together his plot outline. For instance, he envisages California being split off from mainland America after a particularly large quake... when the San Andreas fault is actually a strike-slip boundary which only involves sideways motion, rather than extension, so this could never happen.
In summary, then, it's a terrible read, with no interesting science, and Clarke didn't even write it.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
›
Go to Amazon.com to see all 31 reviews
2.9 out of 5 stars
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars
RICHTER 10, RATING 3
When this book eventually gets into its stride it's a lot better than you might think to begin with. Read more
Published on 27 Feb 2005 by DAVID BRYSON
4.0 out of 5 stars
Entertaining
It's not massively deep, it doesn't want to wrap you up in it's story, it's a VERY good read.
OK there are some serious doubts about the use of the Nation of Islam - but look... Read more
Published on 9 Nov 2001 by Mr. M. Graveston
5.0 out of 5 stars
A stunningly vivid picture of the future
Science and futurology expertly mixed by two titans of the Sci-Fi world. Many will look back on this book in years to come, we have yet to see if mankind heeds it's warnings. Read more
Published on 27 Oct 1999
5.0 out of 5 stars
Very intense and inspiring. The work of two masters.
The book is written by the late Mike McQuay upon a guideline from Clarke.
The action is set sometime next century after the Israelis exercise their "Masada option",... Read more
Published on 6 Jan 1999
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
