This is such a brilliant book I really hope Wendy Shalit writes more books in the near future. She is an incredibly witty writer and thereby manages to expose the confusions of libertarianism, political correctness and radical feminism without in fact being too rude to any individual proponents of these views. Sadly the converse is often not the case due to the insiduous philosophy that 'the personal is the political', which has given many radfems the 'right' to make very bitchy attacks on people with more conservative views rather than arguing seriously with them. Shalit is far, far more perceptive and intuitive than so many contemporary writers on women. Indeed, she has a very intuitive and feminine style of writing which is reminiscent of more old-fashioned Puritan feminists, and is a real breath of fresh air. By means of simply interviewing a range of people on their opinions and personal experiences of the sexual revolution, she is able to untangle all the strings that are attached to libertarian attitudes. There is no judgmentalism or finger-pointing in this book, and that is because it is securely based in essentialist views of gender which hark back to the Enlightenment (and possibly to the author's Jewish background). In other words, the author is secure in herself because her views are objective and not 'personal politics'. There is a problem here though. The author mentions Rousseau as one of the proponents of this essentialism. For all his talk of political freedom, Rousseau propounded a very restrictive education for girls, as did other French 'revolutionary' thinkers. (Liberty, equality, fraternity but not sorority.) His ideas are inadequate as a basis for a modern ethic of gender relations, not the least as he himself gave away his five illegitimate children to an orphanage - hardly the sort of behaviour the author would approve of! Neither is there much discussion of sociobiological views on the topic of modesty, i.e.that it was evolutionarily advantageous, in this book. Seeing as modesty is a social device for restraining men and avoiding unwanted pregnancies, one would expect such a discussion. Then again, her chapter on Male Modesty is a gem; there is so little writing of this kind around it's a pity. There are lots of women who would just melt at the way she says that 'to be a man is to be gentle around a woman'. Plus she makes the honest point that feminists fail to understand, that male modesty has never been valued or praised officially as much as female modesty, and indeed needs to be elicited by it. All in all, a funny, readable book and worth keeping for all the interviews and quotes.