Start reading Rethinking Military History on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here or start reading now with a free Kindle Reading App.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

 
 
 

Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.
Rethinking Military History
 
 

Rethinking Military History [Kindle Edition]

Jaremy Black
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)

Print List Price: £20.99
Kindle Price: £12.48 includes VAT* & free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: £8.51 (41%)
* Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.

Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £12.48  
Hardcover £65.12  
Paperback £18.25  
Kindle Summer Sale: Over 500 Books from £0.99
Have you seen the Kindle Summer Sale yet? Browse selected books from popular authors and debut novelists, including new releases and bestsellers. Learn more

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Purchase any Kindle Book sold by Amazon.co.uk and receive £1 credit to try out our Digital Music Store. Here's how (terms and conditions apply)


Product Description

Review

' [this book] is stimulating and thought-provoking. It will be of particular value to serious students of military history, and to those who aspire to write it.' - British Army Review

'...essential reading for all those with an interest in military history, and all those who wish to take part in moving the discipline forward.' - USI Journal

Product Description

This bold 'thought book' re-positions military history at the beginning of the twenty-first century, reveals the main trends in the practice and approach to military history and proposes a new manifesto for the subject to move forward.

Product details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 740 KB
  • Print Length: 272 pages
  • Simultaneous Device Usage: Up to 4 simultaneous devices, per publisher limits
  • Publisher: Routledge (2 Aug 2004)
  • Sold by: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B000OT7V40
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #417,867 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?


More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
5.0 out of 5 stars
5.0 out of 5 stars
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
22 of 23 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Interesting and challenging 16 May 2008
By Donaldo
Format:Paperback
This is one of those history books that is more a challenge to accepted opinion than a set of radical ideas in itself. The author writes on a range of military matters, mostly centred around how we should be looking to shake off our Western centric view of military history, in that the rise of the West in history was largely due to technical and professional prowess.

The author of course, provides plenty of reasons as to why this is completely wrong, many of which most readers will probably be aware of. The examples cited are ones I have certainly come across before, but taking all those examples together in one book really does present an interesting viewpoint. He indicates at length that our view of military history is largely borne from historical phenomenon - industrialised societies combined with mass conscription. Of course, we no longer live in this world. Western societies are still advanced, but rely often on production in other countries. And hardly any western countries still conscript; certainly very few would be able to do so if the event arose.

As an interesting example, the author considers why there is not more military history written about the Ottoman Empire, a hugely successful and powerful empire which lasted some 800 or so years. The author asks why we are only aware of battles like the seige of Vienna or the naval battle of Lapento. A number of reasons are suggested - the reformation tends to take up a lot more focus in medieaval European history as one. And perhaps the relative peripheral nature of the Ottoman Empire in Europe is another. But then the author turns the issue on its head, and points that actually, to the Ottoman Empire, Europe was actually just one of a few concerns, and a reasonably minor one at that.
Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Thoughts that set you thinking. 31 Jan 2014
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
If you considered the interest in Military History could be covered by a book about a battle or a war then think again. This book takes you where Military Historians ought to go, that is thinking about men, material and combat. Revolution or evolution in technology, method, construction. The arguments are considered in clear text and understandable argument that should encourage the reader to think and think again.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.2 out of 5 stars  5 reviews
27 of 28 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A Military Historiography update 19 Mar 2006
By R. W. Levesque - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
Bottom line: this book fills a much needed gap in reviewing the state of military historiography and its themes. This alone makes it worthwhile for military historians to read this book.

If you're familiar with Black's work, you're already familiar with many of the themes in the book. However, the book captures all of them and then some. He basically addresses six "problems" he sees in "the state of military history as generally consumed by the public at large:" too much of a Eurocentric (and American) focus; a technological bias in explaining military capability; a focus on leading powers and dominant military systems; a separation of land and sea conflict; a focus on traditional state vs. state conflict; and a lack of focus on "political tasking" in the setting of force structure, doctrines and goals, and in the judging of military success. His argument isn't necessarily that these aspects of military history are wrong, only that they ignore other aspects that lead to a fuller understanding of the world -- it skews the perspective.

Black also reviews how military historians have treated warfare since the beginning of the early modern period with chapters on 1500-1815, 1775-1918, and 1914 to today. Although I've read his opinions on many of these themes, there's enough new in the book to make it interesting, and he pulls it together in a more thoughtful manner. In fact, Black refers to it as a "thought book" with a global perspective.

The book is not an easy read and it's not because of differences between American and British writing styles. Black is always a difficult read, as anyone who has read his other books can attest. As an American who has lived in the UK for seven years, and who earned his Masters in War Studies at King's College London, I can tell you there are plenty of other British military historians who are easier to read (Such as Michael Howard, Brian Holden-Reid, Max Hastings, and Colin S. Grey.) Having said that, he may be tough to read, but he's worth it...especially with this book.
9 of 12 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars This is a professional's professional-level book. 10 Jan 2007
By Paladin - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback
Jeremy Black accomplishes exactly what he intends to do - he helps the reader to reframe & rethink many long-standing, taken-for-granted, assumptions and myths about military history. This book is a true innovative gem about military history that sparkles in a droll sea of otherwise banal commonality. This book should be on the shelf of every professional military careerist - especially those who believe that good military policy, theory, strategy, operations, and tactics begin with a solid grasp of good military history. This is a book for those who actually understand the essence of good military history - or those who want to learn about it. Afterwards, you will think about new concepts and perspectives regarding military history in ways you never dreamed of.

This book captures a variety of salient issues that all affect how we assess military effectiveness: an over-reliance upon 'junk' history, heavy technology bias in military thinking, Eurocentricness & American-centricity, a dysfunctional separation of land-vs-sea combat, preoccupation with nation-state conflicts -vs- the general continuum of conflict, a generally unfocused "political" guidance for a very wide range of highly important military issues, and our all-too-often cultural 'myopicness' in military understanding and approach.

You should disregard any myopic 'scholarly' critique that falsely purports to know exactly what the vast majority of military history readers want. Instead, you should focus on what you know you want. You should disregard any myopic 'scholarly' critique that would falsely degrade a book simply because it is written in a culturally different style of English than one is normally use to. For without doubt, there are numerous foreign writers whom average Americans as well as highly regarded academics find their foreign style of writing a bit rough in reading. ( And "Herr Clausewitz" is surely at the top of that long list.) Instead, you should focus on the content of new concepts and perspectives - not miniscule nuances in writing style.

If anything, this book may overwhelm the average (or below average) reader only because it is heavily laden, page-to-page, with a plethora of new concepts and perspectives by a master military historian - who has looked at military history from every side of a military Rubik's Cube - and knows exactly what he is talking about.

You cannot read this book only once - for if you love military history, this book WILL captivate you.
26 of 38 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars Poorly written study of major problems in military history 24 Mar 2005
By Historian - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback
Black sees some major problems in military history today:

1. Eurocentricity-especially in western Europe and the USA.

2. Technology bias in explaining military cabability and fascination with technology.

3. A focus on leading powers and dominant military systems.

4. A separation of land from sea conflict in most analysis.

5. A focus on state to state conflict rather that use of force within states (except for major civil wars).

6. A lack of focus on political tasking in the setting of force structures, doctrines and goals, and in judging military success.

He also identifies several trends, noting that the emphasis on technology is too great; there has been a primitivization of non-western combatants, and that military history has a very battle centered approach. Black calls for lowering barriers between history and social sciences work on war and violence. Why? There has been too much emphasis on operational accounts.

Military history now is the "last stronghold of the Whig interpretation." He urges us to beware of any one "western way of war" (as does John Lynne), meta-narratives, paradigms and mono-causal explantations. He emphasizes diversity of military practice: there is no single western way of war...War is pluralistsic in its character.

There has also been a trend to simplify the non-western military history.

He also calls for a debate on how to explain military change: we can't just assume that it's a mechanisitic or an automatic search for efficiency to maximize force. Traditional military histories avoid using cultural approach, which is related to war and society. With regard to assessing operational capabilities, Black says that care should be taken to avoid focusing too much on resources and technology, especially weapons systems and in the history of asymmetrical warfare.

He also seems to reject Keegan's work to some degree, especially the "Face of battle approach": it shows a timeless quality of men facing combat which may not take into account that battle is much more culturally conditioned and varied.

All of this is important to the current state of military history, and should be the subject of great debate. The problem is this: the vast majority of people who read military history (and thus buy the books on the shelves) want books about battles and leaders, especially with a dramatic, fast paced narrative OR they are military/defense professionals either in uniform or civilians, who want professional development/"lessons learned" type books. The reading audience does not want cultural history overlays to their "trumpets and drums" books, nor do they want to see race, class and gender as the focus of this subject. Black covers this fairly well in the first chapter of the book.

The problem with THIS book though is that Black's prose is truly dreadful. An editor with some backbone should have turned it back to him and said "make it readable." The book is so poorly written, with severely awkward syntax, etc. that its impact will be limited because so few people will be able to tread the whole thing.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars A useful work on the study of military history 29 Nov 2009
By Stage 3 - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback
Professor Black has written an interesting and useful survey of military history. It is not a book for the casual reader but it will make those people with an interest in the study of military history think about that subject. He has a constant theme throughout the book about the Europe-centric nature of military history. This is not the only line of argument that he writes about, although it did seem to be the major recurring point. Professor Black founded his argument on a very good understanding of non-western military history. He did not just use the common examples like the Mongolians or Samurais but looked further afield to back up his arguments.

He started the book with a comprehensive survey of works about military history. I found this chapter to be very critical of a number of other prominent military historians, such as Sir John Keegan. Maybe other readers would view it differently to me but that was the feeling that I finished the chapter with. He is also critical of non-academics who write military history in that they can not devote the resources nor understanding that academics can to research. He examines popular military history and notes the way that sensationalism is used in packaging military history.

He made some very good points about the technology focus of military history where some historians become obsessed with the technology used in conflicts and look no further. The problem with that approach can be that different cultures use technology differently or that the technology was not key to the issue but a focus on technology is blind to those criticisms.

I was a little lost in his chapter that discussed using the theme of military objectives as a way to view and understand military history. I am not sure what this chapter was trying to say as a whole but that may have been me missing the point.

The final three chapters appear to return to a conventional chronological approach to military history but even here Professor Black is making a point. There are few easy and clear chronological lines out there to divide history along. This absence is even clearer when military history is viewed globally and not just from a Western Europe or USA aspect.

The book was often not the easiest book to read but it was full of ideas and views that made me think about the study of military history. It would be hard to write a book about military history and not cause controversy but Professor Black is one writer who can stand behind the impressive amount of work that he has produced on military history to prove that he is no light weight on the subject. I thoroughly recommend the book to anybody who is serious about military history and wants to consider how it should be approached.
11 of 23 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Don't believe every critique that you read! 26 Feb 2006
By i-Palikar - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
Some critiques are NOT culturally sensitive, intelligent, or insightful - nor are they competent, "scholarly" critiques.

In defense of this fine book versus misguided `unscholarly' critiques {especially by the arrogance of those who might openly beg the moniker of "scholar"}, one should be aware of several fundamental nuances that are highly important:

1) The true merit/worth of any book is embedded deep within the intellectually salient, insightful, timely and prescient concepts that a book presents for review and discussion. It is actually quite irrelevant whether or not a book is "perceived" as containing dreadful prose with awkward syntax by some personal standard. There are many highly intelligent and insightful people who don't speak, write, or read the King's English - and most Americans fall under that category. Yet, this small flaw in writing does not and should not detract from recognizing true intelligence and insightfulness - at least not to those who are truly intelligent and insightful and deserving of the title "scholar".

2) The concepts presented in Jeremy Black's book "Rethinking Military History" are indeed intellectually salient, insightful, timely, prescient, and, without doubt, highly irreverent to those who are hopelessly doomed as only be able to think in the drudgery of old, obsolete, paradigms that no longer work. It is only because some folks are hopelessly doomed to think inside the trap of flawed obsolete thought patterns that they cannot understand true intellectual insightfulness when they see it - which is precisely why they can't "see" anything that doesn't coincide with their stodgy mentality. This book is for those who want intellectual stimulation with fresh new insights on the vast and convoluted subject of military history - it is NOT a book that is for those who are intellectually challenged on the subject of military history. However, it is a book that requires the reader to actually think and reflect - something that many self-professed `scholars' have forgotten how to do. It is NOT a book about battles and leaders, nor is it a "lessons learned" type book. It is a book for the kind of professional development that can only be accomplished through reading and reflecting upon unusual concepts and new ideas.

3) Jeremy Black is a "British" military historian - and the British culture versus the American culture are often noted for being separated by a common language. This small insignificant fact may help account for the misperception that Black's prose is dreadfully laden with faulty syntax and other unpardonable faux pas. Of course, the true cognoscenti can see beyond such small issues, and they automatically ask the question " Awkward syntax by what standard - the British cultural standard or the American cultural standard?

If you seriously purport yourself to be a `scholar' of military history - a true scholar who craves intellectual stimulation with fresh new insights - then read, think and reflect upon Jeremy Black's book "Rethinking Military History" !
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Popular Highlights

 (What's this?)
&quote;
In short, military history becomes an aspect of total history; not in order to ‘demilitarize’ it, but because the operational aspect of war is best studied in terms of the multiple political, social and cultural contexts that gave, and give, it meaning. &quote;
Highlighted by 6 Kindle users
&quote;
the historical memory of the American military establishment and of policy makers in the American government extends no further back in time than World War Two. Faith in technology is so strong and pervasive that earlier history is seen as irrelevant and there is a lack of interest in earlier historical parallels. &quote;
Highlighted by 4 Kindle users
&quote;
histories for support for preconceptions, despite the clear intention of the writers to offer far more &quote;
Highlighted by 3 Kindle users

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   


Look for similar items by category