Rethinking Expertise and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more

Buy Used
Used - Very Good See details
Price: 23.95

or
 
   
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Colour:
Image not available

 
Start reading Rethinking Expertise on your Kindle in under a minute.

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Rethinking Expertise [Hardcover]

Harry Collins , Robert Evans


Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition 14.42  
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  

Book Description

16 Nov 2007
What does it mean to be an expert? In "Rethinking Expertise", Harry Collins and Robert Evans offer a radical new perspective on the role of expertise in the practice of science and the public evaluation of technology. Collins and Evans present a Periodic Table of Expertises based on the idea of tacit knowledge - knowledge that we have but cannot explain. They then look at how some expertises are used to judge others, how laypeople judge between experts, and how credentials are used to evaluate them. Throughout, Collins and Evans ask an important question: how can the public make use of science and technology before there is consensus in the scientific community? This book has wide implications for public policy and for those who seek to understand science and benefit from it.

Customers Who Viewed This Item Also Viewed


Product details


More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"Starts to lay the groundwork for solving a critical problem - how to restore the force of technical scientific information in public controversies, without importing disguised political agendas." - Nature "A rich and detailed 'periodic table' of expertise... full of case studies, anecdotes and intriguing experiments." - Times Higher Education"

About the Author

Harry Collins is distinguished research professor of sociology and director of the Center for the Study of Knowledge, Expertise, and Science at Cardiff University. He is the author of, most recently, Gravity's Shadow and, with Trevor Pinch, Dr. Golem, both published by the University of Chicago Press. Robert Evans is a reader in sociology at the Cardiff School of Social Sciences.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 5.0 out of 5 stars  2 reviews
17 of 18 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Dissecting expertise 30 April 2009
By J. Michael Innes - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
This is an interesting and, I believe, important book. It attempts to define expertise, and account for its development and its influence in modern society. At a time where there is such rapid social, scientific and technological change, the general public is heavily dependent upon the information that can be gleaned from scientists and authorities about the utility, risks and safety of technological developments. How can the public establish the validity of the judgments that are made by scientific authorities? Further, at this time of economic dislocation, the veracity of the expertise of economists must be seriously challenged by the victims of the changes.
Collins and Evans define expertise as the acquisition of "tacit knowledge", deep understanding that arises from immersion in the practices of social groups. We are all immersed in social groups of various kinds and have amassed tacit knowledge in many domains; the examples of learning to speak a native language or to drive a motor vehicle competently are two examples. To go to the acquisition of tacit knowledge in broader, more esoteric areas, with the acquisition of scientific tacit knowledge we have the example of individuals immersing themselves in the practices of laboratories for long periods of time to be able to assimilate the very subtle practices that differentiate the expert from the learner.
The important point made by Collins and Evans is to distinguish between what they term "Contributory Expertise" from "Interactional Expertise". The former is what we normally think of the expert; the person who can make contributions to the advancement of a discipline and who, potentially, possesses the knowledge to pass on to later generations through teaching and example. The latter is a form of expertise which also comes from deep immersion with a discipline but does not come with the ready ability to make a contribution to the discipline or field. This is the role taken by someone like a lawyer who is able to probe the testimony of an expert witness in court and, perhaps, expose flaws in the argument or in the manner in which evidence has been gained. It is also the role of the sociologist of science, like Collins, who has, for example, analyzed the development of understanding in gravitational wave physics Gravity's Shadow: The Search for Gravitational Wavesor Malcolm Gladwell who has a deeper understanding of much of the discipline of social psychology than many social psychologists Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking.
The important question is, can we tell the difference between the "contributory" expert and the "interactional"? Collins and Evans conduct experiments in which such experts respond to questions about the area of study and their answers are judged by an expert who tries to identify which is which. Interestingly, expert judges often cannot tell the difference on the basis of verbal responses. Of course, when it comes to making a contribution to the understanding of gravity waves, Collins, the interactional expert, cannot take the next step, whereas the real expert possibly could. But the member of the public may not be able to tell them apart. And when the two appear in public to make statements about safety or risk, or make predictions of change, whom do we believe? Also, many "experts" in their fields contribute precious few real contributions to their discipline, largely regurgitating information provided by other "real" experts. And, after all, if the lawyer can expose the faulty thinking and the erroneous evidence of the "expert" witness on the stand, who is the "real" expert? This book alerts us to major and subtle problems in our understanding of the nature of understanding of complex issues in the modern world.
There is much to be drawn from this relatively slim volume. This review has only begun to present the tip of the arguments and the importance of the outcomes of the analysis. It is well worth reading and thinking about. Such careful analysis should change your views of "experts" for ever. It also raises significant questions about the nature of the training of experts, how we understand that training and how we assess successful outcomes. Those who train professionals in business and the social sciences can certainly learn a great deal from a reading of this book. The book is not complete. Collins and Evans, I think, do not draw out sufficiently the consequences of the problems of uncertainty of judgment about the nature of expertise. They refer at one point to the errors made by economists in making predictions about movements of the stock market, arguing, however, that such failures to predict do not undermine the essential nature of their expertise. In the light of the fundamental flaws investment decisions made by economist experts in the last year one has to question whether these "experts" were much more than verbally fluent "interactional experts" with little fundamental understanding of the dynamics of their discipline. A reading of some recent critics can only reinforce this suspicion.The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable
There is one final thought on this. Isaac Asimov, Isaac Asimov: The Complete Stories over half a century ago, wrote a short story, "The Distant Past" (1956), in which the major contributions to the advancement of science were made by the journalists who were the only people who could bring all the disparate fields together, essentially interactional experts. Asimov was far ahead of his time, as was also H.G. Wells, The Country of the Blind and Other Stories (Penguin Classics)cited in this book for his thoughts of the seeing man in the "country of the blind". A reading of a wider literature in order to understand the subtle nature of "expertise" would not go awry. We have a long way to go to understand expertise and its acquisition. This book is a great help.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Magnificent insight into expertise 16 Jan 2011
By Samuel Martinsson - Published on Amazon.com
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
This is a fascinating exploration of expertise. The leading idea is: How can I identify an expert ?
This question pops up every day: is this climate change scientist an expert ? Should I trust this nutritionist ?
The gravity of such decisions becomes evident when parliamentary committees invite experts to testify or when citizen groups
launch action against new technologies.

Additionally, Collins and Evans set to define a new class of expertise: interactional expertise.
Somebody can be an expert in the sense that she speaks the language of experts, without being able to contribute
original knowledge in her field of interactional expertise. Collins himself is an interactional expert in
gravitational wave physics, even though he is a sociologist.

The book describes experiments (real, gedanken and Turing-test) about faking expertise, these alone warrant reading the book.
Collins (with Trevor Pinch) has previously published Dr. Golem: How to think anout medicine, which explores medical expertise.
It includes a nice chapter of fake doctors, which is only shortly discussed here. Unlike Dr. Golem, this book is not a popular science book. Rather heavy sometimes.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   


Look for similar items by category


Feedback