J. P. Telotte is one of the foremost authorities on the science fiction film in academia today, having also broader survey of the history of the SF film, entitled simply SCIENCE FICTION FILM, and of higher technology in world cinema, entitled simply A DISTANT TECHNOLOGY: SCIENCE FICTION FILM AND THE MACHINE AGE. The value of this volume consists in its focus on what Telotte correctly identifies as the most dominant motif in the SF film, the artificial person, whether conceived as robot, android, cyborg, replicant, or reanimated being.
The book's greatest strength is that it manages to hit all the highpoints in the history of cinema. One might have wished for some films to receive more or even some discussion, but there can be no quibbling that the films actually discussed represent the most important films of the genre. I also liked that he included a chapter on serials, the only place where you can find robots onscreen (with minor exceptions) between METROPOLIS in 1927 and Gort in THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL in 1951. Apart from a needlessly convoluted dissection of FORBIDDEN PLANET, most of his analyses are interesting and insightful. This is likely to stand as one of the standard works on artificial people in film for some time to come.
The book is not without flaws. It at times falls prey to some of the weaknesses of academic writing. For instance, I mentioned above the rather poor discussion of FORBIDDEN PLANET, with a rather beside-the-point belaboring of "doubles" within the film. The writing on doubling mainly serves to present a rather strained point that fails to illuminate anything in the film, but merely serves to articulate an insight that feels rather manufactured. Luckily this is an exception in the book.
One thing that I rather regret in the book is that it continues the rather harsh division between film and television. In the past 25 years far more has been done with robots, cyborgs, and other artificial people than in film. In addition, because television is better suited for in depth character analysis, the explorations of the issues raised by these creations are far more developed. Granted that this book was published in 1995 and therefore before the advent of Max on DARK ANGEL, Adam in Season Four of BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER, Sharon Agathon and other Cylons on BATTLESTAR GALACTICA, Seven of Nine and the Emergency Holographic Doctor on STAR TREK: VOYAGER, Andromeda Ascendant on ANDROMEDA, Jake on JAKE 2.0, Kyle on KYLE XY, and Cameron on TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES. Nonetheless, there had been a plethora of robots on TV, including the Robot on LOST IN SPACE (clearly a version of Robbie the Robot, who receives considerable discussion in the book), Rhoda Miller in MY LIVING DOLL, the Daleks and Cybermen on DR. WHO, Hymie on GET SMART, Max Headroom on the show of the same name, Hawks and McQueen on SPACE: ABOVE AND BEYOND, and, most importantly, Data on STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION. The ST:TNG episode "The Measure of a Man" is very nearly as important as BLADE RUNNER or ROBOCOP in exploring precisely what it means to be a person. But in the end, I think the omission of any discussion of TV reflects the ongoing though misguided assumption that film is "important" while television is not. Though I ran two different film societies while in grad school, my own belief has evolved in recent years to where I believe that television has actually surpassed film as the thinking person's medium. I am hardly alone in this. There has been an incredible explosion in academic writing about television in the past decade. Hopefully people will cease viewing television and film in such exclusive ways, since the two media are so deeply intertwined. There are, of course, major differences, but these differences as well as their likenesses should be addressed, not ignored.
Still, this is going to remain one of the key texts on the history of artificial people in film. More than aliens, space travel, or time travel, the robot, cyborg, or android is the motif of choice for the modern SF film. This excellent book provides a solid exploration of the history of that motif.