- Paperback: 240 pages
- Publisher: University of Minnesota Press (24 Oct 2000)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 081663551X
- ISBN-13: 978-0816635511
- Product Dimensions: 2.3 x 1.5 x 0.1 cm
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 2,315,360 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
| |||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample PagesConcordance
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
1 review
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
Narcissus redivivus
13 Sep 2005
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
It's easy to get lost in the refracting images of Narcissus, but Bruhm happens to be an excellent guide through the morass. He opens the book with a challenging but rewarding survey of recent relevant scholarship (Earl Jackson, Leo Bersani, Moe Meyer, Gregory Bredbeck are all discussed). He then provides an elegantly written contribution to the evolving themes of the Narcissus myth which is heavily indebted (but updated) to Louise Vinge's thematic study.
The best chapter by far (for me) is "Reverse of the Mirror" (chapter 2) which lays out Gide and Wilde on Narcissus. It is an excellent study of the differences between the two writers who otherwise shared so much friendship. One wonders in the end how they could have been such close friends. Bruhm works through "Telleny" which is possibly by Wilde, maybe pseudo-Wilde. This is a pornographic work, the first of its kind to have been attributed to a literary man of genius such as Wilde.
Also of note is his chapter on Nabokov.The book is not at all boring to read even though it treats some very boring literature (I mean Freud). Bruhm includes plenty of humor while sustaining his polemic throughout. The one regret is that he did not prove (to me at least) how Narcissus is a same-sex love story. I mean, I can see how it might be read that way but I am not sure that even Ovid meant it that way. I think that Bruhm's argument toward such a same-sex narrative might have been bolstered by a closer examination of Philostratus' "Imagines" and an historically valid look at the appearance of Narcissus in ekphrastic works of the second century. Louise Vinge hinted at the scholarship available on the Philostrati as well as other post-Ovidian works that treated it before the onslaught of Christian based compulsory heterosexuality.
Despite these quibbles of mine I think this book is an excellent addition to queer theory.
The best chapter by far (for me) is "Reverse of the Mirror" (chapter 2) which lays out Gide and Wilde on Narcissus. It is an excellent study of the differences between the two writers who otherwise shared so much friendship. One wonders in the end how they could have been such close friends. Bruhm works through "Telleny" which is possibly by Wilde, maybe pseudo-Wilde. This is a pornographic work, the first of its kind to have been attributed to a literary man of genius such as Wilde.
Also of note is his chapter on Nabokov.The book is not at all boring to read even though it treats some very boring literature (I mean Freud). Bruhm includes plenty of humor while sustaining his polemic throughout. The one regret is that he did not prove (to me at least) how Narcissus is a same-sex love story. I mean, I can see how it might be read that way but I am not sure that even Ovid meant it that way. I think that Bruhm's argument toward such a same-sex narrative might have been bolstered by a closer examination of Philostratus' "Imagines" and an historically valid look at the appearance of Narcissus in ekphrastic works of the second century. Louise Vinge hinted at the scholarship available on the Philostrati as well as other post-Ovidian works that treated it before the onslaught of Christian based compulsory heterosexuality.
Despite these quibbles of mine I think this book is an excellent addition to queer theory.
Was this review helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
