This extraordinary movie has been watched all over the world throughout the sixty years since it was made. Probably no day passes without it being shown somewhere in the world. I doubt these statements are true of any other movie except, perhaps, 'Casablanca'. Moreover, many of the people that love it don't particularly like ballet. Some actively dislike classical ballet. How can this be?
It is so successful because the director pulls so many of the arts together in one construct, each and all of them to an unsurpassed standard. Dancers, musicians, composers, choreographers, actors, painters, stage designers, cinematographers, lighting designers, studio technicians - even producers! - all gave of their transcendental best to tell a universally well-loved, traditional folk-tale interpreted by one of the greatest storytellers ever, and to tell it as a ten-hankie love story.
Two artists in particular should be noted, as they often get left out, upstaged by the more obvious talents of Walbrook, Shearer and Massine, who each grab your attention whenever they are on screen.
First, and perhaps greatest of the lot, Jack Cardiff for his brilliant, innovative camera-work and Technicolor photography, especially because these were the early days of Technicolor and he, a hitherto unknown Brit cameraman, introduced, for the first time, a painterly eye which amazed the American Technicolor specialists. His extraordinary and innovative camerawork for the ballet within the film has never been equalled.
Second, Brian Easdale's music rarely gets proper credit, probably because the Red Shoes' sprightly theme is lifted directly from Elgar's 1901 'Cockaigne' overture. The music is no worse for that, as Easdale creates his own evocative variations with brilliant development and orchestration, precisely reflecting the style typical of contemporary ballet music in the first half of the 20th century. Exciting, emotional, highly rhythmic, eminently danceable ballet music, perfectly interpreting the subject.
Moira Shearer (a dancer at the peak of her powers on the classical ballet stage at the time) was famed for the unrivalled precision of her dancing. She not only entrances us with her talent and gorgeous combination of red hair and creamy skin, but, at a (much) lower level, reduced males to blubber with the shot of her pert bottom in little dance shorts as she walked towards the exercise barre. Wow!
Ignore the Amazon review - it is disgracefully irrelevant to this iconic movie. This is certainly the best movie about ballet ever made and by any standard one of the best movies of all time. Even if you do not like ballet, you must see it once. If you like ballet, you will see it many times.
I saw Red Shoes when it first came out in 1948, when I was a boy of sixteen and head-over-heels in love with my own real-life, beautiful ballet dancer!! Which is, of course, why I have seen it several times a year ever since, will continue to watch it until I make my own final exit, stage right, and will never accept any criticism of it whatsoever. Of course this movie is over the top - this is ART, for Heaven's sake! And that driven bastard Lermontov is, unfortunately, only too right. As he says in the movie - "NOTHING..matters..but..the..music." As I was to learn the hard way, human emotions ARE transitory, while art lives for ever. The human drama of how this plays out in the movie is what makes it a great film as well as the best ever film about ballet.
No real art gets made without enormous sacrifice. Ever