- Paperback: 270 pages
- Publisher: Continuum International Publishing (11 Oct 2006)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 082649241X
- ISBN-13: 978-0826492418
- Product Dimensions: 23.9 x 15 x 2 cm
- Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 873,283 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Amazon.co.uk Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
'This book provides a readable exposition and assessment of a range of theodicies, and makes a valuable contribution to debate about one of the less common responses to the problem of evil. It would therefore be of interest both to undergraduates and to those with a postgraduate interest in questions about the coherence of theism.'Elizabeth Burns, Heythrop College, Religious Studies--Elizabeth Burns, Heythrop College, Religious Studies, Vol 44, 2008
Product Description
This is an important new book on how we can still believe in a God of love and confront the problem of evil in the world. Probably the most important book on the subject since John Hick's book "Evil and the God of Love". Evil is a strong word that people now employ fairly rarely. Many people believe these days that God is omnipotent, omniscient and good and that what we deem to be bad or evil in the world is no reason for abandoning belief in God. It is an intellectual or theoretical problem not one where the focus is on how one might bring about some desirable goal (a practical matter). Professor Davies says we should tackle this problem by attending to the basics, by asking whether there is a God and then What is God? He starts by summarizing the arguments so far (from Seneca to the present day). He then moves to what he describes as the basics (see above) and demonstrates that much of what has been written about on the topic of evil is in fact irrelevant or just plain wrong. Finally, though many theologians argue that evil is a mystery, Davies argues that this too is wrong and a cop out. We should rather be concerned with the problem (or mystery) of good. The real issue is 'Why is there not more good than there is'. From the discussion Aquinas emerges as a hero (as filtered through analytical philosophy) but many moderns thinkers do not emerge so well. Davies effectively picks holes in the arguments of Peter Geach, Paul Helm, Richard Swinburne and even Mary Baker Eddy. This is a lively book on a tricky subject, written at all times with humour and much practical example.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Tag this product(What's this?)Think of a tag as a keyword or label you consider is strongly related to this product.
Tags will help all customers organise and find favourite items. |
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
|
Share your thoughts with other customers:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars
A comprehensive and creative account,
By
This review is from: Reality of God and the Problem of Evil (Paperback)
1. This book is a good outline of the debate up to this point (the author traces past arguments/possible positions on the problem of evil and the problem from evil fairly and concisely.)2. His creative defense of the existence of God in the face of evil still faces the central problem of many defenses: He turns God into something very different from the common conception of God (personal, loving, etc). However, his arguments for this God (e.g. how God can be righteous without being personal in our sense, etc)are very strong/creative. 3. How not to exonerate God are excellent chapters showing the fallacies of past attempts. I did not completely understand his critique of free will defense though. In the end, I still feel like he greatly changes the concept of God in order to deal with evil... in ways that will be unacceptable to many theists. However, he exposes many a fallacy on both sides of the debate throughout this book and takes this dialogue to the next stage.
Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta) Amazon.com:
4.0 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews) 7 of 14 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
The reality of evil IS a problem for god,
By Hande Z - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Reality of God and the Problem of Evil (Paperback)
Brian Davies leads us to expect that he has an answer to the basic problem of evil in the Christian conception of an all knowing, all powerful, and all benevolent god. The very fact that evil exists is a strong, if not irrefutable argument that the creator of all universe cannot be at once all powerful and all good. However, reading through to the end, one wonders what point Davies has succeeded in making except that the problem has not been solved. It appears that having very articulately drawn up all the arguments by atheists such as Hume and pointing out the strength and persuasiveness of these arguments, and also bringing up the standard defences of Christian apologists such as Aquinas and Plantinga, Davies was at last about to deliver the punch line. He didn't. His conclusion seems to be that there is nothing we can do about evil. It exists, but it does not mean that it proves that God therefore does not. Davies says that we cannot judge God by the moral standards we judge ourselves. That seemed to be a weak argument because there is no other standard by which we judge whether any god was good or bad. We cannot say that a god is good by applying a tandard of good that we do not understand. It seems that ultimately, Davies had fallen back on an old theistic defence - we are in no position to understand God's reasons. The number of qualifications and emphasis he made to distance himself from some of his own strongest arguments only made his own position even more difficult to understand. However, to say that in the end, he had not explicated a clear and persuasive position that the problem of evil resonates against the concept of a good and powerful god, is not to say (using Davies' favourite phrase) that the book is not worth reading. The arguments that he takes us through were all cogent and coherent. Only his conclusions weren't. The book is worth reading just for the arguments. The reader can form his own conclusions.
7 of 16 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars
A God To Ignore,
By Reader - Published on Amazon.com
This review is from: Reality of God and the Problem of Evil (Paperback)
Imagine this scenario: A little girl is cruelly abused by her parents. Psychologically scarred, she grows up to be a drug addict and prostitute. Because she takes drugs while pregnant, she gives birth to a blind and retarded baby.Question: How could a good God allow this? Why did he create a world where innocent babies are born blind and retarded? Isn't this evidence that God doesn't exist, or, if He does, that He isn't good or all-powerful? Fr. Davies has an answer to this challenge. It turns on the notion of positive existence. All positive existence flows from God. However, evil does not have positive existence. It is the lack of something. Cruelty is the lack of a good character. Addiction is the lack of will power. Blindness is the lack of eyesight. Mental retardation is the lack of intelligence. The upshot: Since evil doesn't have positive existence, it wasn't created by God. God bears no causal responsiblity for the chain of suffering that leads to a handicapped baby. God is off the hook. Fr. Davies takes seriously the idea that God is the unable-not-to-exist source of contingent existence -- and not much more. As the source of being, God is good. However, He is not a person nor is He bound by moral rules. He isn't required to minimize the pain in the world. And while He must be posited to explain the existence of contingent things, He is more mysterious than anything He's invoked to explain. If you buy this line of reasoning, you'll love "The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil." The book is clearly-written. It rejects attempts to anthropomorphize God. It is a worthy example of Thomist philosophizing. It also does a great job of making theism and Christianity seem unattractive and irrelevant to human concerns. Who needs a God like this? |
|
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
