| |||||||||||||||
 Trade In this Item for up to £9.60
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Real Freedom for All: What (if Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? (Oxford Political Theory) for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £9.60, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
"The most forceful and sophisticated advocate of basic income from [a principled] angle."--Journal of Political Philosophy
"This is clearly an importasnt work in political theory. It's superbly written and argued, full of insights from economic theory. More importantly, it is, broadly speaking, right. . . .Van Parijs's book .... makes clear that he is among the leading contemporary theorists."--Ethics
"A highly original defense of capitalism's legitimacy....First-rate analysis, not the least because it confronts theories of justice at the intersection between philosophy and economics."--Choice
Product Description
Capitalist societies are full of unacceptable inequalities. Freedom is of paramount importance. These two convictions are widely shared across the world. Yet they often seem in complete contradiction with each other. Fighting inequality jeopardizes freedom; taking freedom seriously boosts inequality. What can be done? Can the circle be squared? Philippe Van Parijs offers a ground breaking solution to the dilemma. Assessing and rejecting the claims of both socialism and conventional capitalism, he presents a clear and compelling alternative vision of the just society: a capitalist society offering a substantial unconditional basic income to all its members. Moving beyond pure political theory, Van Parijs shows what his ideal of free society means in the real world by drawing out its controversial policy implications. Real Freedom for All will be essential reading for anyone concerned about the just society and the welfare state as we move into the twenty first century.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
2 reviews
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
A Good Start
19 Mar 2009
Format:Paperback
Philippe Van Parijs is a Belgian philosopher and political economist (correcting what reviewer "disidente" wrote). In this book Van Parijs makes a good start at constructing a solid philosophical and pragmatic argument for the desirability and possibility of establishing an unconditional guaranteed income. Upon this foundation others have been working to erect a Basic Income Guarantee, such as the Green Party of Canada, Green Party of England and Wales, Vivant (Belgium), De Groenen (The Netherlands), the Scottish Green Party, and the New Zealand Democratic Party. Worldwide, supporters of a basic income have united in the Basic Income Earth Network (http://www.basicincome.org/bien/). In the USA, the USBIG Network (http://www.usbig.net/) has carried the torch for this idea. Read this book if you want the clearest and most intellectually rigorous arguments to date for a guaranteed income for all. If you'd like to read critical counterarguments and Van Parijs's responses, I recommend that smaller (and much less expensive) "What's Wrong with a Free Lunch?" by Van Parijs et al which is available here on Amazon.com.
1 of 5 people found the following review helpful
an odd defense of liberal capitalism
6 Feb 2009
Format:Paperback
This book offers a rather odd defense of capitalism. The author is a liberal British academic philosopher. He argues that capitalism could only be defensible if there is an unconditional basic income provided to everyone. By "unconditional" he means that you are not required to work to obtain it. He calls this "real libertarianism". I think in fact he's not likely to convince either right wing or left wing libertarians. Left libertarians will argue that no society is free as long as workers are subordinated to bosses in work, for example...but this is an issue van Parijs doesn't discuss.
His argument is situated in the philosophical debate about "negative" and "positive" forms of liberty. The "negative" idea of liberty is that you are free if you are not coerced. This is the concept of freedom defended by right wing libertarians. Left wing libertarians argue that one also needs "positive" freedom, which may include things like equal access to resources (education, health care, etc) for charting your path in life, actual self-managment of decisions that affect you. The author's "unconditional basic income" is intended as his proposal for the "positive" form of freedom.
He doesn't address the basic problem that capitalist elites will have the resources and power to prevent any such entitlement to be enacted, or would always be working to reduce it or eliminate if it was enacted.
His argument is situated in the philosophical debate about "negative" and "positive" forms of liberty. The "negative" idea of liberty is that you are free if you are not coerced. This is the concept of freedom defended by right wing libertarians. Left wing libertarians argue that one also needs "positive" freedom, which may include things like equal access to resources (education, health care, etc) for charting your path in life, actual self-managment of decisions that affect you. The author's "unconditional basic income" is intended as his proposal for the "positive" form of freedom.
He doesn't address the basic problem that capitalist elites will have the resources and power to prevent any such entitlement to be enacted, or would always be working to reduce it or eliminate if it was enacted.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
