I love John Spong's books, and this one is a very good introduction to all the books of the Bible, helping us to appreciate them and be inspired by them without being oppressed by the need to believe everything in them. Unfortunately, it lets itself down in places with some silly mistakes that can only come from hasty writing. For example, in his imaginative re-telling of the story of David and Bathsheba (p 73) he says that the reader is not told that Bathsheba was a married woman until after we hear of her pregnancy: this is not so. On page 190 he says that Lamentations comes before Jeremiah, though he has rightly said earlier on the same page that it comes after Jeremiah. He also refers to Jairus (p 279) as 'a Gentile', though the text says he was one of the leaders of the synagogue (or am I missing something?).
I also find rather irritating his anachronistic references to 'Jews'. He refers to Abraham as the founder of the Jewish nation (p 21), and to the kingdom of Israel as 'a Jewish state' that traced its Jewish roots primarily back to Joseph (p 26). This is probably deliberate simplification, but in my opinion it is over-simplification. The 'Jews' were the people of Judah, who claimed descent from Jacob's son Judah. There is no way Judah's great-grandfather or his brothers could be Jews. Even in an introduction to the Bible meant for lay people, to explain the difference between 'Israelites' and 'Jews' is surely not too complicated.
Spong's relating of the form of the Synoptic Gospels to the annual round of synagogue worship is interesting, but not always well explained. I simply could not follow what he was saying about the Sermon on the Mount being a commentary on the Beatitudes in inverse order, in spite of his calling it 'a perfect fit' (p 332).
So thank you, Bishop Spong. Carry on giving us the benefit of your bold theology and fascinating insights, but please take a bit more time to explain yourself, and maybe get yourself a better proof-reader.