Even for me it is not natural to link the words, Reformed, Environment and spirituality, but this book does exactly that. In going back to sources Calvin, Puritan writers and Jonathan Edwards, no less, Belden C Lane explores the understanding of nature through the environment.
Some of it was not a surprise to me, I am used to the idea that creation is not just created by God but is being created or sustained by God. That is God's relationship with creation is not linear, it did not start at the Big Bang and proceed from there, it is continually and four dimensional. God created all time. Therefore nature is suffused with the existence of God.
What was new to me is the way he was able to link this understanding to Calvin and Edwards, the way he draws on Calvin's use of the creation as the theatre of Gods performance, or Edwards wanting to develop understanding of God through the countryside of New England. The way they both saw Christians as needing to learn from God's other book that is creation.
Also what surprised me was his argument that desire is at the core of Reformed Spirituality, that discipline is rather to train desire than an end in itself. That to be a Christian is to be a desirer of God and it is important to develop that desire, in this nature is one of the school masters. Desire learnt from nature only becomes problematic when we let the desire remain with nature and not point to him who is its creator.
Belden D. Lane is honest enough to tell us that the desire is also one that is not satiated in this life, if we desire God then it will never be fully filled, nature will tantalise, but also will bring times when we experience the absence of the desired as well as the desired.
He shows quite fully that this tradition has existed alongside the ideas that the earth was given to humanity to be subdued, that the desire for God through nature, has turned rather to the desire to control nature for our own ends and we have grasped at what we should have blessed. The Reformed tradition is no innocent here and he does not seek to make it so.
As such he does successfully in my opinion what so many have done in the Reformed tradition from Calvin on and that is return to the sources and find a new, fresh reading that has implications for today.