- Two MP3 Albums for £10. Buy this and one other MP3 Album from a great selection for no more than £10. Here's how (terms and conditions apply)
 |
| ||
- Original Release Date: 1 Jan 2005
- Format - Music: MP3
- Compatible with MP3 Players (including with iPod®), iTunes, Windows Media Player
- Also available in CD Format
Buy this MP3 album with any other MP3 album under £8 and pay no more than £10 for both (terms and conditions apply). Just look for any album with this message, put it in your basket with another eligible title and the discount will be applied at checkout. |
MP3 Songs
Previous
Play all
Next
Play all samples
MP3
Paused
Loading ...
Unavailable
Loading ...
Volume slider
Mute/Unmute
To view this content, download Flash player (version 9.0.0 or higher)
| Song Title | Artist | Time | Price | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Play | 1. Symphony No. 1 (2003 version): I. Andante | Mikko Franck | 15:44 | Album Only | ||
| Play | 2. Symphony No. 1 (2003 version): II. Poetico | Mikko Franck | 7:39 | £0.59 | ||
| Play | 3. Symphony No. 1 (2003 version): III. Allegro | Mikko Franck | 4:19 | £0.59 | ||
| Play | 4. Adagio celeste | Mikko Franck | 7:42 | £0.59 | ||
| Play | 5. Book of Visions: I. A Tale of Night | Mikko Franck | 11:10 | Album Only | ||
| Play | 6. Book of Visions: II. A Tale of Fire | Mikko Franck | 7:36 | £0.59 | ||
| Play | 7. Book of Visions: III. A Tale of Love | Mikko Franck | 10:08 | Album Only | ||
| Play | 8. Book of Visions: IV. A Tale of Fate | Mikko Franck | 11:21 | Album Only |
Sold by Amazon Media EU S.à r.l. By placing your order, you agree to our Terms of Use.
Special Offers and Product Promotions
Product details
|
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
Format:Audio CD
This is not really as bad as the reviewer PhilsterNo1 makes out. Okay, Rautavaara does tend to sound a bit samey when you are familiar with his stylistic fingerprints but I find this collection to be rather pleasant listening. I'm not sure if the cobbled on Poetico movement in the first symphony quite blends in with the rest of the symphony, but perhaps the formal layout puts me in mind of Shostakovich's 6th Symphony- the first movement though is lovely vintage Rautavaara.
The Adagio Celeste sounds as if it was developed from the 2nd movement of Rautavaara's String Quintet "Unknown Heavens" from 1997 and it is pretty and soothing.
I rather like the Book of Visions which with its four movements seems like a symphony in disguise, and one wonders if Rautavaara was putting off writing a ninth symphony, but I found this more approachable than his 8th symphony for it does have an appealing program behind it. He tells 4 tales - of Night, Fire, Love and Fate and relates that he had a life-threatening attack as soon as he had finished the last movement 'Fate'... but he still lives to tell his tales.
The Adagio Celeste sounds as if it was developed from the 2nd movement of Rautavaara's String Quintet "Unknown Heavens" from 1997 and it is pretty and soothing.
I rather like the Book of Visions which with its four movements seems like a symphony in disguise, and one wonders if Rautavaara was putting off writing a ninth symphony, but I found this more approachable than his 8th symphony for it does have an appealing program behind it. He tells 4 tales - of Night, Fire, Love and Fate and relates that he had a life-threatening attack as soon as he had finished the last movement 'Fate'... but he still lives to tell his tales.
3 of 15 people found the following review helpful
Format:Audio CD
What was I thinking? These SACD/CD hybrids always sound weak on ordinary CD players and this was no exception. The music seems very familiar for obvious reasons: Rautavaara is recycling the same soundscapes already familiar from such masterpieces as the Seventh Symphony and the piano concerti.
Adagio Celeste, in particular, plays like a medley of other adagio movements. The Book of Visions is rather tepid stuff, indulgent and uninspired. Best here is the much revised First Symphony, but its imitation of Shostakovich in the finale rendered the whole thing pointless for me.
[]
Adagio Celeste, in particular, plays like a medley of other adagio movements. The Book of Visions is rather tepid stuff, indulgent and uninspired. Best here is the much revised First Symphony, but its imitation of Shostakovich in the finale rendered the whole thing pointless for me.
[]
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
2 reviews
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Wonderful
13 Dec 2007
Format:Audio CD
Rautavaara seems to be on plane where his recent works are all, as the other reviewer seems to state, have a tendency to sound the same. This is true, if you only listen to them once or twice, but as with all composers who have a distinctive voice the more you listen the more you learn and appreciate. take book of visions for example. It is actually a marvelous piece-the third movement is one of the most beautiful and remarkable pieces Rautavaara has composed, but I didnt notice this the first few times I listened. It wasnt until I heard it by accident well after I had written it off. When I heard it on the radio, I couldnt believe my ears--and then to find out it was a piece I had thrown into my own personal "classical concentration camp."
So I revisited the CD as a whole-and I find it to be remarkable.
I cant argue with the fact that all of his music is starting-or does- sound the same now. But that is his voice, and yoou can tell a rautavaara piece just like you can tell a mozart piece, or a Haydn piece, or a beethoven piece........(not comparisons). either way-this is a fine disc, it just takes time to appreciate-and I find that the music I love the best didnt always hit me the first time(like Wagner or Prokofiev, or Poulenc) Music that you love immediately tends to wane pretty fast.
This is accessible modern music, meaning that this isnt atonal strategic noise, or bleep-bloop anti-beauty music-in fact it is the opposite and I recommend it thoroughly.
So I revisited the CD as a whole-and I find it to be remarkable.
I cant argue with the fact that all of his music is starting-or does- sound the same now. But that is his voice, and yoou can tell a rautavaara piece just like you can tell a mozart piece, or a Haydn piece, or a beethoven piece........(not comparisons). either way-this is a fine disc, it just takes time to appreciate-and I find that the music I love the best didnt always hit me the first time(like Wagner or Prokofiev, or Poulenc) Music that you love immediately tends to wane pretty fast.
This is accessible modern music, meaning that this isnt atonal strategic noise, or bleep-bloop anti-beauty music-in fact it is the opposite and I recommend it thoroughly.
2 of 7 people found the following review helpful
The first symphony in its latest revision, as well as two new pieces from his "I'm just milking it" phase
8 Dec 2007
Format:Audio CD
This 2005 release of music by Einojuhani Rautavaara might seem like a big deal with its dual SACD/CD layer and three world premieres with big fan Mikko Franck conducting the National Orchestra of Belgium. Yet, as with so much of Rautavaara's late music, people are going to end up cursing themselves for seeking out the disc when the music on it is so meagre, light, fluffy, insubstantial etc. (I was lucky to listen to a library copy).
Take "Book of Visions" (2003/2005) for example. Fourty full minutes of long drawn-out string lines over a pedal point, with no meaningful development. Occasionally Rautavaara will throw in some rumbling percussion to spice things up, but the lack of direction is painfully obvious throughout. I fail to understand why the conservatives hold up Rautavaara as an ideal modern composer when his music has so much less, well, *musical* content than the greats of the classical era. Maybe the fad is over, as at a recent Helsinki performance of "Book of Visions" people started walking out and one listener called it a "book of monotony". The short "Adagio Celeste" for string orchestra (1997/2000) is more of the same. Indeed, I'd challenge a Rautavaara fan to tell a snippet of it from "Book of Visions", the composer's last two symphonies, or "Isle of Bliss".
There is one piece here which is somewhat more interesting. Rautavaara wrote his Symphony No. 1 in 1955, and both the first version and a 1988 revision have been widely recorded before. In 2003, however, he revised the piece yet again to add a slow movement between the two main ones, though as the slow movement is based on a song he wrote in the '50s the spirit of the piece is preserved. The piece is highly reminiscent of Shostakovich, whom the young Finnish modernists of those times admired. This piece is completely listenable, although one feels it is more the fulfillment of a student's assignment to imitate the Russian composer than a significant new acheivement.
The liner notes consist of Rautavaara's own comments on the music, which as common with his late works are described as emanating from some other, metaphysical realm and only transmitted to us by the composer. I'd have to say that if this is true, the divine is boring indeed.
Take "Book of Visions" (2003/2005) for example. Fourty full minutes of long drawn-out string lines over a pedal point, with no meaningful development. Occasionally Rautavaara will throw in some rumbling percussion to spice things up, but the lack of direction is painfully obvious throughout. I fail to understand why the conservatives hold up Rautavaara as an ideal modern composer when his music has so much less, well, *musical* content than the greats of the classical era. Maybe the fad is over, as at a recent Helsinki performance of "Book of Visions" people started walking out and one listener called it a "book of monotony". The short "Adagio Celeste" for string orchestra (1997/2000) is more of the same. Indeed, I'd challenge a Rautavaara fan to tell a snippet of it from "Book of Visions", the composer's last two symphonies, or "Isle of Bliss".
There is one piece here which is somewhat more interesting. Rautavaara wrote his Symphony No. 1 in 1955, and both the first version and a 1988 revision have been widely recorded before. In 2003, however, he revised the piece yet again to add a slow movement between the two main ones, though as the slow movement is based on a song he wrote in the '50s the spirit of the piece is preserved. The piece is highly reminiscent of Shostakovich, whom the young Finnish modernists of those times admired. This piece is completely listenable, although one feels it is more the fulfillment of a student's assignment to imitate the Russian composer than a significant new acheivement.
The liner notes consist of Rautavaara's own comments on the music, which as common with his late works are described as emanating from some other, metaphysical realm and only transmitted to us by the composer. I'd have to say that if this is true, the divine is boring indeed.
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Look for similar items by category
