... the business of distorting the Past. Forgetting, distorting, glamorising, glorifying, idealising, belittling, romanticising - how obliging, how malleable the Past is.
R.D. Laing in letter to Marcelle Vincent, 29 September 1949*
In the introduction to Adrian Laing's remarkable biography of his father - Glaswegian psychoanalyst, poet and musician, Ronald David Laing - he states that the biggest difficulty was always going to be overcoming the prejudice that had developed over the years both for and against his father. Later, he remarks that whilst undertaking the monumental task of researching his father's life- through interviews, Laing's personal papers and the secondary literature - the question often arose of how correct his father's pronouncements were. Adrian decided that his father was correct about 50% of the time; but this, of course, only raises the question of which 50%?
Depending on what you read and who you listen to, there are several R.D. Laings. There are already three biographies as well as books of interviews, memoirs, films, documentaries and academic works**. Therefore the job of the reader is to separate fact from distortion, so as to reveal more clearly both ideologically-motivated debunking exercises and uncritical romanticising. This is no simple task: Laing was somewhat prone to `finessing' the truth himself in the construction of his own history and public persona. Indeed, at points, Adrian even suggests a degree of exaggeration in his father's accounts of the trials and adversities he experienced in his own upbringing.
I must confess that I also have an interest in perpetuating a reappraisal of Laing's ideas. I faced many of the same problems while producing a recent film on Laing and the work of his peer group***. Association with Laing's ideas (as I discovered) is prone to knee-jerk reactions from others - there is no mild or dispassionate view of his work. But in the final analysis, I have come to the conclusion that what truly matters is neither whether or not Laing was an anti-psychiatrist, nor whether he romanticised madness and rendered the families of patients culpable, but that he had a deep empathy and understanding of those who suffer. Moreover, he had a profound comprehension of the social and environmental causes of that distress. In our own period of late capitalist crisis- of public inquiry and parliamentary investigation into systemic failings in the relationships between banks, big business and government; at a time, indeed, when the pharmacological business has become the second most profitable industry in the UK - the work of R.D. Laing is well worth serious reconsideration. For Laing was one of the the first to question the hegemony of medicine, the use of drugs and physical therapies in dealing with these profound human, existential problems. Thus, for me, Adrian Laing's book was the perfect starting point.
*Quoted in Mullan, B (1997). R. D. Laing. Creative Destroyer. Cassell, London, p. 72.
** one recent study- Beveridge, A (2011). Portrait of the Psychiatrist as a Young Man. Oxford University Press- also comes highly recommended.
*** Fowler, L (2011) All Divided Selves.