This book is heavy going in places but as it is written by many different authors, some chapters are easier than others.
I have been reading Old Testament criticism for about fifty-five years but someone coming to it new gets a very concise summary of the various debates. A lengthy introduction updates us on the `6 Bible bullets' against homosexuality. Scholars seem to turn over this debate endlessly and it is hard to keep up with it.
On the plus side, the book is very fair to the insights of Judaism and seeks to distance itself from supercessionism, for example in using the terms first and second testaments .
One of the best articles is that by Thomas Hanks, on the epistle to the Hebrews.
Marcella Althaus-Reid's article on Mark's Gospel is full of insight (I usually find her work impossible to comprehend) but is also inaccurate - she claims that the earliest manuscripts have no accounts of the resurrection. This is not true - they have no accounts of resurrection appearances but they do contain the empty tomb. Also, she refers to a meeting of the Lambeth Conference is 2003 - does she mean 2008?
Thomas Bohache's article on Colossians argues that it should be removed from the canon of scripture because it endorses, rather than challenges, the status quo of the Roman Empire. It's a pity that he didn't keep his reading up to date. Brian Walshe and Sylvia Keesmaat's Colossians Remixed: Subverting the Empire demonstrates in considerable detail that the exact opposite was the case.
Bohache also suggests that Barth, Bultmann and Rahner emphasize Christ's divinity at the expense of his divinity. He is woefully ignorant of their theology if he thinks that.
On the negative side, there is some special pleading. It seems like every biblical character is gay. This is a reading into the text, though there is a place for but reading playfully in the style of midrash. However, the chapter on the book of Revelation sees phallic symbols everywhere. Such far-fetched eisegesis is likely to put straight people off; the very people who ought to read this book.