This rather interesting collection of essays concerns the general psychology of superheroes and the traditional ideas that go with them.
Some of the insights revealed in the essays are truly fascinating. Particularly the book's final essay by Peter DeScioli and Robert Kurzban called 'Cracking the Superheroes Moral Code', which reveals some of the properties unique to superhero myths.
Michael Spivey and Steven Knowlton's essay on Anti-heroes, a form of hero abundant in this genre, is another highlight. This essay tries to define what exactly an anti-hero is, and goes on to psychologically analyze some of the most popular anti-heroes, like Wolverine, Judge Dredd, Batman, The Punisher, and Sin City's Marv.
All the essays here are well written, and many provide interesting points to their prospective topics. Many are even enjoyable to read. However the collection has one vital flaw. I'm not sure who would really be interested in this book, as some of the essays are obviously pitched at comic enthusiasts while others seem to be for psychology students.
I'm on the comic book side of things and don't really know a lot about psychology, but I think I know enough to know that superheroes maybe aren't the best subjects to analyze, generally their psychologies are pretty flimsy. Batman a case in point, would any 8 year old boy upon seeing his parent's murder, decide to fight crime dressed as a bat? No. Maybe he would try and get the guy who did it, and then become a hopeless drunk.
Comic book fans will pick up a few ideas here and there, but most will seem pretty obvious if you've been reading comics for a while with adult eyes.
In short, by trying to please both audiences for this book it hasn't really fully pleased either. Both camps will have fun reading it for sure, but not a lot more than that.