Unconventional, startling, often grotesque, and genuinely overwhelming, Peter Greenaway's 'Prospero's Books' is one of the most experimental and striking adaptation of Shakespeare's works yet put to film. 'Prospero's Books' uses Shakespeare's 'The Tempest' as it's base, but this isn't an adaptation for the purists. A great deal of the original text is cut from the film, and when used, is often melded in as part of the film's soundtrack (including one of Ariel's most prominent speeches), or else written on screen, as opposed to spoken; in the distinctive caligraphy of Prospero (the protagonist played superbly by John Gielgud's, who puts in a wonderfully measured performance). The film is far more garish and explicit than Shakespeare's original vision. Stomachs unravel to reveal pregnant wombs, nudity is absolutely rife, and even outside of shock value, the physical deformities of the pained Caliban, are often difficult and moving to watch. Whilst Shakespeare's text sometimes feels a little lost within all this visual spectacle - the film's visuals are, as well as stunning on their own merit, often weaved into the plot of 'The Tempest', to reinforce or add meaning. The books of Prospero, which appear in a frame within the frame of the film, and pop up buildings, diagrams, and explorations of the body within them, are a fine example of this.
Though 'Prospero's Books' is excellent, it still falls just short of its aims. A little too much of the text of the original play is lost amidst the visual splendour, and there are some visual experiments which don't always work (such as, in my personal opinion, the relationship between Caliban and the two drunkards), but 'Prospero's Books', even when it fails, still never fails to capture the attention of the viewer. For those looking for a modern, original adaptation of one of Shakespeare's greatest plays, or just for those looking to watch something thoroughly different and eye-catching, I would heartily reccomend Greenaway's 'Prospero's Books'