 Trade In this Item for up to £0.25
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Private Battles: Our Intimate Diaries: How the War Almost Defeated Us for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.25, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
|
More About the Author
Product Description
Book Description
The true story of how the ordinary people of Britain won the Second World War - and of how they almost didn't - by the bestselling author of Our Hidden Lives
Product Description
In Private Battles, award-winning writer Simon Garfield has skilfully interwoven the diaries of four ordinary people as they struggle to cope with the day-to-day reality of life during the Second World War. Their voices combine to create one of the most compelling and refreshing takes on the period ever published.
Meet Maggie Joy Blunt, a perceptive but frustrated young writer living alone near Slough. Pam Ashford, a shipping clerk in Glasgow who writes of office life as if it were an episode of The Archers. Edward Stebbing, a 20-year-old discharged soldier living with a stern landlady in Essex. And Ernest Van Someren, a research chemist in Hertfordshire, father of two children and proposer of several unique scientific ways to beat the Nazis.
Perhaps here, for the first time, is the true story of how the ordinary people of Britain won the Second World War. And of how we almost didn't.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
5 of 5 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Sussex University holds the Mass Observation archive, survey responses and diaries submitted by civilians during the late 1930s and 1940s in particular. Simon Garfield has selected the diaries of four people to provide different perspectives on the events of 1940 to 1945. (His two other books cover 1939-40 and 1945-1948).
The fascination is the fresh insights to the mood and pre-occupations of civilians at the time, with the crucial element that they were submitted within days or weeks of having been written and hence do not benefit from the wisdom of hindsight. Some of the details are fairly predictable such as diet, morale, etc. It's also interesting to judge some of the rumours reported with the benefits of hindsight: most of them are false. There are surprises, not all of them pleasant: all the writers report hearing anti-Semitic attitudes, and few seem to challenge them - bearing in mind thousands of Jewish people were dying each day at the hands of the Nazis this seems deeply shocking from today's perspective.
Equally important, though, is the insight you have into the four diarists as people. Of course, you can overstate this: each of them knew they were writing for external consumption and possibly `for posterity' but the diaries have an unselfconscious style that suggests that over five years it is hard to maintain an image at odds with reality. However, this does mean your enjoyment of the book will be partly determined by whether you warm to the diarists or not.
Four people's diaries were included. For me, the star is Pam Ashford, an educated woman working as a secretary in a shipping company. Her experience covers the other people in her office, shopping for her brother and mother, as well as a social life. Maggie Joy Blunt, a single woman (a middle-class professional in today's terms), is also interesting but writes less often and is ground down somewhat by the demands of a job, shopping and keeping her house. The two men in the book were less interesting to me. Edward Stebbing was a soldier but was invalided out for unspecified reasons; he grows up noticeably in the course of the book. Ernest van Someren works in an engineering company in Hertfordshire and is the only one of the four to be married and with a family. The war seems to have almost no impact on him and I admit I became irritated that he seemed so detached from it.
This raises the question of the selection Simon Garfield made, both in terms of diarists and material. He explains some of his choices in the Introduction, and explains he wanted a geographical and social spread as well as being restricted to people who kept regular diaries throughout the period. Without having access to the archive (which is not freely available online) it is impossible to judge the choices he made. Were there other diarists who could have been more interesting? What did he edit out from the diarists he did select?
Overall, this is thoroughly recommended reading, having said which I think the length of period covered and limited range of diarists (and the people) chosen make it the weakest trilogy.
The fascination is the fresh insights to the mood and pre-occupations of civilians at the time, with the crucial element that they were submitted within days or weeks of having been written and hence do not benefit from the wisdom of hindsight. Some of the details are fairly predictable such as diet, morale, etc. It's also interesting to judge some of the rumours reported with the benefits of hindsight: most of them are false. There are surprises, not all of them pleasant: all the writers report hearing anti-Semitic attitudes, and few seem to challenge them - bearing in mind thousands of Jewish people were dying each day at the hands of the Nazis this seems deeply shocking from today's perspective.
Equally important, though, is the insight you have into the four diarists as people. Of course, you can overstate this: each of them knew they were writing for external consumption and possibly `for posterity' but the diaries have an unselfconscious style that suggests that over five years it is hard to maintain an image at odds with reality. However, this does mean your enjoyment of the book will be partly determined by whether you warm to the diarists or not.
Four people's diaries were included. For me, the star is Pam Ashford, an educated woman working as a secretary in a shipping company. Her experience covers the other people in her office, shopping for her brother and mother, as well as a social life. Maggie Joy Blunt, a single woman (a middle-class professional in today's terms), is also interesting but writes less often and is ground down somewhat by the demands of a job, shopping and keeping her house. The two men in the book were less interesting to me. Edward Stebbing was a soldier but was invalided out for unspecified reasons; he grows up noticeably in the course of the book. Ernest van Someren works in an engineering company in Hertfordshire and is the only one of the four to be married and with a family. The war seems to have almost no impact on him and I admit I became irritated that he seemed so detached from it.
This raises the question of the selection Simon Garfield made, both in terms of diarists and material. He explains some of his choices in the Introduction, and explains he wanted a geographical and social spread as well as being restricted to people who kept regular diaries throughout the period. Without having access to the archive (which is not freely available online) it is impossible to judge the choices he made. Were there other diarists who could have been more interesting? What did he edit out from the diarists he did select?
Overall, this is thoroughly recommended reading, having said which I think the length of period covered and limited range of diarists (and the people) chosen make it the weakest trilogy.
13 of 14 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Being a humble diarist myself, I am always fascinated by books of this genre and this is a very good one.
It gives us an insight into the lives of five very different people who kept diaries in the immediate post World War Two era. They were part of the Mass Observation project which was set up to record the lives of ordinary people in Britain. Simon Garfield weaves the five lives together.
The people featured never met, but they all lived through the same times of uncertainty when rationing continued despite the fact the war had ended. The great thing about these diaries is how they weave together discussion on national and international topics with the details of mundane private lives. By approaching the subject matter in date order it is sometimes difficult to remember previous comments made by the diarists. To achieve this I would have to go back again and read the entries from individuals in order rather than inter-twining them as the author does. That is only a small criticism. Garfield had to decide whether to use chronological or personal order and I guess he has chosen the most interesting option so that you don't get bored with a specific character.
I particularly liked Herbert Brush, the London pensioner, who showed a wit rather lacking in some of the others and Herbert wrote diabolical poetry. We get wonderful entries such as "I paid my usual visit to my bank manager for him to certify that I am still alive. I gave him a couple of large tomatoes." Dear old Herbert is completely off the wall at times: "I walked along Charing Cross Road to see whether I could find a book giving prime numbers up to five million or so... but every bookseller said No without any hesitation. Even Foyles could not help me." Later on he advocates a new calendar which begins each month on the same day of the week!
The book brilliantly evokes the times as you are taken into the lives of the five people. I detested the gay antiques dealer B Charles who came out as a self opinionated bore with dangerous views. At one point he says: "I often think that the Germans deserved to win the war. It is a constant source of amazement to me how France has got away with it for so long. A treacherous false nation.... It would be a good thing, in a great many ways, if the whole of France could be swallowed up in an earthquake, along with the entire population! They are no good."
Charles also turns on the Americans and British and seems throughout to be a Nazi sympathiser: "Goering was a very brave man and I am very glad indeed to learn that all the Nazis died very bravely. In 25 years time they will be heroes and martyrs." How wrong could he be!
Elsewhere there is plenty of anti government sentiment with Maggie Blunt from Slough, George Taylor, an accountant from Sheffield and Edie Rutherford, a South African housewife from Sheffield all pitching in.
The book is hugely informative, good fun and very illuminating about a period in our history that has often been ignored. I can thoroughly recommend it.
It gives us an insight into the lives of five very different people who kept diaries in the immediate post World War Two era. They were part of the Mass Observation project which was set up to record the lives of ordinary people in Britain. Simon Garfield weaves the five lives together.
The people featured never met, but they all lived through the same times of uncertainty when rationing continued despite the fact the war had ended. The great thing about these diaries is how they weave together discussion on national and international topics with the details of mundane private lives. By approaching the subject matter in date order it is sometimes difficult to remember previous comments made by the diarists. To achieve this I would have to go back again and read the entries from individuals in order rather than inter-twining them as the author does. That is only a small criticism. Garfield had to decide whether to use chronological or personal order and I guess he has chosen the most interesting option so that you don't get bored with a specific character.
I particularly liked Herbert Brush, the London pensioner, who showed a wit rather lacking in some of the others and Herbert wrote diabolical poetry. We get wonderful entries such as "I paid my usual visit to my bank manager for him to certify that I am still alive. I gave him a couple of large tomatoes." Dear old Herbert is completely off the wall at times: "I walked along Charing Cross Road to see whether I could find a book giving prime numbers up to five million or so... but every bookseller said No without any hesitation. Even Foyles could not help me." Later on he advocates a new calendar which begins each month on the same day of the week!
The book brilliantly evokes the times as you are taken into the lives of the five people. I detested the gay antiques dealer B Charles who came out as a self opinionated bore with dangerous views. At one point he says: "I often think that the Germans deserved to win the war. It is a constant source of amazement to me how France has got away with it for so long. A treacherous false nation.... It would be a good thing, in a great many ways, if the whole of France could be swallowed up in an earthquake, along with the entire population! They are no good."
Charles also turns on the Americans and British and seems throughout to be a Nazi sympathiser: "Goering was a very brave man and I am very glad indeed to learn that all the Nazis died very bravely. In 25 years time they will be heroes and martyrs." How wrong could he be!
Elsewhere there is plenty of anti government sentiment with Maggie Blunt from Slough, George Taylor, an accountant from Sheffield and Edie Rutherford, a South African housewife from Sheffield all pitching in.
The book is hugely informative, good fun and very illuminating about a period in our history that has often been ignored. I can thoroughly recommend it.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
For anybody with an interest in the social history of WW2 this book is a must read. The characters drawn from the Mass Observation experiment draw us into the minutiae of their lives to provide the reader with the most incredible insight of what life was really like. Having had a mother who was seven and a father who was seventeen when the war started it gave me an opportunity to understand the micro pre-occupations of those who experienced those years. This is social history at its best. This book and its sequel Our Hidden Lives are amongst the most enthralling books I have ever read and I have to confess to shedding at tear at the end when I had to say goodbye to all the characters.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
- Books > Biography > Historical > Britain > Military
- Books > Biography > Historical > Britain > Social & Urban History
- Books > Biography > Historical > Countries & Regions > Europe
- Books > Biography > Historical > Social & Urban History
- Books > Biography > War & Espionage > World War II
- Books > History > Britain & Ireland > Ireland
- Books > History > Cultural History
- Books > History > Europe
- Books > History > World History > World War II 1939-1945 > Battles & Campaigns
- Books > History > World History > World War II 1939-1945 > Biographies & Memoirs
- Books > History > World History > World War II 1939-1945 > Origins
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
