The Princes in the Tower: Amazon.co.uk: Alison Weir: 9780712673792: Books

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

› Visit Amazon's Alison Weir Page

Product Description

The story of the suspicious deaths of Edward V and his brother Richard, is one of the most fascinating murder mysteries in history. In this book, the author re-examines all the evidence, including that against Richard III. Weir reconstructs the events leading to their murder, and why they died.

About the Author

Alison Weir lives and works in Surrey. Her books include Britain's Royal Families, The Six Wives of Henry VIII, Children of England, Eleanor of Aquitaine and Henry VIII: King and Court.

Tags Customers Associate with This Product

(What's this?)

Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.

richard iii(1)

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

25 Reviews

5 star:		(6)
4 star:		(7)
3 star:		(3)
2 star:		(7)
1 star:		(2)

Average Customer Review

3.3 out of 5 stars (25 customer reviews)

Share your thoughts with other customers:

Create your own review

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

22 of 24 people found the following review helpful:

3.0 out of 5 stars Murder, Lies and Red Roses!, 6 Oct 2004

By

Mrs. D. J. Smith "eowyngreenleaf" (Luton, England) - See all my reviews
(VINE VOICE) (REAL NAME)

This review is from: The Princes in the Tower (Paperback)

Alison Weir is perhaps best known for her Tudor history titles and I will not hesitate to recommend these to you, but unfortunately her pro-Tudor/Lancastrian bias is all too evident in this look at Richard III and the 'Princes in the Tower'. She informs the reader that she will be taking an objective look at the facts, but it's pretty clear that from the outset she has already pronounced her verdict!

To give Weir credit, it's a well written book and if you are interested in this subject you might like to read it, but if you do, PLEASE make sure you read some other theories too - and then make up your own mind from the available evidence.

She presents her 'theory' with such conviction of it's being the truth, that's it's easy for the uninitiated reader to take her word as gospel. Her theory is, however, precariously balanced - a house of cards built on a foundation of assumptions. She takes Sir Thomas More pretty much as gospel, because he has 'the ring of authenticity', despite the fact that he was a child when Richard was piteously slain, and few historians take him without a large pinch of salt and where he can be substantiated from other sources. Of course, when More's writings do not fit Weir's theory, he must be mistaken, of course....

The analysis of the skeletons found in the Tower is interesting, but her reliance on the textile 'evidence' for these being the Princes is weak. There is one report on the discovery of bones which mentions pieces of 'rag and velvet'. This was from an eye witness, not a textile expert, and the fabric has not been seen since, so it's hardly concrete proof that they are even of the period we are looking at!

If you're looking for some further reading and want a bit more balance, Paul Murray Kendall is perhaps still the best overall biography of Richard, but weak on the case of the princes and not a light tome for the beginner! Bertram Field's 'Royal Blood' is an excellent analysis of the case - you may be interested to see Weir's arguments picked apart! Also Geofrey Richardson's The Hollow Crowns and The Deceivers are well worth reading and give some new ideas. Tey's The Daughter of Time is excellent fiction as is Reay Tannerhill's The Seventh Son, but these are not meant as serious history.

Perhaps we'll never know the truth, but there's plenty here to mull over. I enjoy reading this if only for the fun of being able to pick my own holes in Weir's theories....

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse | Permalink

Comment Comment

28 of 31 people found the following review helpful:

2.0 out of 5 stars a very biased telling of the tale, 3 Feb 2005

By A Customer

This review is from: The Princes in the Tower (Paperback)

This was the first book I read on the subject of the princes and I picked Alison Weir's book because I had read her retelling of the Wars of the Roses and found it to be very clear and ejoyable. Indeed I found this book to be the same. However when I started to read around the subject I realised just how impartial she was not. She clearly loathed Richard III from the start. She had her theory ie as guilty as hell and she was going to interpret every single fact in that light.
She sees the devil in every single one of Richard's acts. Most critics allow Richard to be a good ruler even if they find him guilty of the murder of his nephews. Not miss Weir. I do not wish to discourage anyone from reading this book but please do not let her be the only author you read on this subject. Bertram Fields provides a good analysis of this book and would be an excellent choice for reading straight after.

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse | Permalink

Comment Comment

15 of 18 people found the following review helpful:

4.0 out of 5 stars Poor King Richard................, 27 Mar 2003

By

"brynnin" - See all my reviews

This review is from: The Princes in the Tower (Paperback)

I like Alison Weir's books, and indeed own most of them, and I find her a very readable and, usually, credible historian. However, in this case I am certainly not convinced of King Richard's guilt and find that the evidence for it relies far too heavily on vague "quotations", hearsay, and worst of all on the word of Sir Thomas More. Although he was a very worthy man, he was a child of five when King Richard died and was educated in the household of Cardinal Morton, Henry Tudor's toady and an implacable enemy of King Richard! Such "evidence" can scarcely be considered unbiased in my opinion.
I also felt that Ms Weir had already decided that Richard was guilty before she began the book and that she was therefore juggling all the facts to fit her theory.
Nevertheless, I did enjoy the book because Ms Weir's style and prose are always excellent, but in this case I think we must "agree to disagree"!
To anyone interested in this subject I would recommend "The Daughter of Time" by Josephine Tey, which is the book that first
kindled my enduring fascination with all things "Ricardian".

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews

Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Report abuse | Permalink

Comment Comment

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all 25 customer reviews...

Most Recent Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars Enjoyable
I enjoyed reading this very much. Alison Weir was very concise in her explanations, and gave just enough detail without making it too "heavy" a read. One to keep and re-read.

Published 12 months ago by Mrs. N. Millican

5.0 out of 5 stars Labour of Love
Clearly Richard III is a hot topic among both professional and amateur historians. I am pretty new to the debate and confess to being a bit surprised as to what all the fuss is... Read more

Published 22 months ago by conjunction

5.0 out of 5 stars A great read
I found this book easy to read and the historical links were well presented with an interesting insight into the fate of these two boys. Read more