| |||||||||||||||
![]() Featuring essential resources for professionals and students in many areas of media and mass communications, Focal Press books keep you up-to-date and demystify ever-changing technologies to help you gain success. Check out the Focal Press store. |
Product details
|
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Painters of the late nineteen century reacted to photography by moving away from realism into impressionism and other schools that emphasized aspects other than imitation. Modern photographers have reacted to digital photography in one of two ways. Some have embraced the new medium, happy to be delivered from the mess and isolation of the darkroom. But a few have gone in the opposite direction, emphasizing the craft itself, and seeking to rediscover the charm and the attraction of the earliest photographs.
Alan Greene is one such reverse pioneer. He has looked at the oldest photographs produced by nearly forgotten techniques like cyanotype and albumin, and seen something missing from modern, technically perfect photographs. Part of it is the attraction and charm that comes from the hand-made nature of a primitive, less-than technically perfect image. But another aspect is the more direct participation of the photographer in every aspect of the creation of the image.
Greene finds his artistic satisfaction in not only the darkroom processes, but in the direct creation of the tools and materials of photography. In this he is not unlike those artists who grind their own colors or make their own paper. Whether the finished product is better because of it is not the issue; I think Greene would instead take the position of Walter Benjamin as outlined in his famous essay, "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction". Benjamin argued that it was the hand of the artist that brought what Benjamin called the "aura" or the essence of the art.
To accomplish this end Greene has carefully reconstructed the historical processes and tools of the 19th century photography. Wooden cameras, simple and compound lenses, and traditional chemestries are carefully detailed in a way that a careful craftsman could duplicate. The results, judging from the samples Greene shows in his book, are worth the effort.
*A DIY guide for the manufacture of primitive lenses, and
*The Calotype process.
The chapter on lens construction is very good. Greene builds all of his lenses from scratch. His book describes how to build several different types of vintage lenses from PVC, foam core, and glass elements of modern manufacture.
I, however, have never built any of the lenses I use; rather, I've bought several period lenses from antique dealers and E-Bay. The pride of my collection is a full plate Holmes, Booth, & Haydens daguerreotype lens, c. 1853--it takes as sharp an image
today as it did a century and a half ago! But sadly, using antique lenses has caused me no end of headaches. For example, they are difficult to repair when broken. And I'm always more than a bit nervous when I take that beautiful HB&H into the field...
On the other hand, the only problem with a lens made from PVC is well...that it looks like a hunk of water pipe! Cosmetics aside, Greene's lenses--I imagine--work as well as their vintage prototypes. And if you know a good machineist, you can substitute brass for PVC and create a museum quality reproduction.
Using Greene's instructions, I've already begun work on a pair or single element landscape lenses for a wet plate stereo camera.
Greene's information on the calotype process is also excellent. Though, the attention I devote to producing dagoerreotypes and wet plate images leaves me little time for calotypes. Greene's book is still a valuable reference. Indeed, during the late 1850's, daguerreotypes, ambrotypes, and calotypes were all being produced contemporaneously. The soft, warm look of the calotype was the perfect compliment to the exqusite sharpness of the daguerreotype.
|
|
|