Have one to sell? Sell yours here
or
Get a £0.35 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card
Politics Of Hope
 
See larger image
 
Tell the Publisher!
I’d like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Politics Of Hope [Paperback]

Jonathan Sacks
5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)

Available from these sellers.


Formats

Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback --  
Unknown Binding --  
Trade In this Item for up to £0.35
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Politics Of Hope for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £0.35, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.


Product details

  • Paperback: 320 pages
  • Publisher: Vintage; New edition edition (2 Nov 2000)
  • Language English
  • ISBN-10: 0099765411
  • ISBN-13: 978-0099765417
  • Product Dimensions: 19.6 x 12.4 x 2.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 256,942 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Visit Amazon's Rabbi Jonathan Sacks Page

Product Description

Review

"A rich and eloquent book... deserves to become a key text." -- "The Times"

Product Description

The argument of this book can be stated simply. There are two concepts of a free society, one liberal, the other libertarian. For the past fifty years the libertarian view has prevailed. Shared by politicians of the left and right, it maintains that a free society is ideally one in which individuals are free to pursue their own choices, both political and moral.This view has been tried and failed and has given rise to a social disorder more bleak than any within living memory. In The Politics of Hope Jonathan Sacks proposes a new politics of responsibility in which families, neighbourhoods, communities, voluntary organisations and religious groups have all part to play, a politics not of interest, but of involvement. How, he asks, as a society, do we move from the politics of despair to the politics of hope?

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

 (What's this?)
Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
 

Your tags: Add your first tag
 

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?


Customer Reviews

4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Dr. Sacks has done a spectacular analysis as to what happens to a society that strays away from the family, the community and its religious practices. The author uses the Bible, very effectively to trace the origin of the family as a covenant and compares the difference between this model and the Hobbesian model. Yet, Dr. Sacks is not at all negative, he exhorts us to return the social community,in which the family, neighbors and religious institutions form the foundation and the strength of the community.The community will therefore, be wealthy, (as the author describes) in social capital. This is a very well written book not to be read quickly but to ponder and analyse every thought. I recommend highly to any reader concerned to remeber how we began where we are and where we want to go.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
6 of 17 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Dr Sacks, acutely aware of the weaknesses of contemporary society, sets out to explore how we might 'shape up better'. Like his former Reith lectures the heart of the debate into which he so humanely and calmly takes us is one, no less than, the re-moralisation of language. He manages this without ever falling into a moralising, strident unpleasantness.
Initially i thought this book was simply going to be a critique of the lapse of liberalism into a debased sub-species called libertarianism and his avowed wish to replace it with communitarianism. Put thus the eyes could easily glaze over for there is no mention here of the moral elements that Sacks teases out of the social-political mix. Politics is never mentioned just as politics and given the vunerable minority status of Jews this is not just to be expected but welcomed absolutely. Somewhat confusingly, to the set of prejudices of this reader, Sacks does not want ,minimal gov. nor the fuller version he calls welfare liberalism. While he may not be successful at stamping out what form the new politics should be taking (he notes the present day is transitionary) - this may be rather a naive and deterministic way of looking at the social process anyway - what he does manage , brilliantly, is to show us how we might first of all reacquaint ourselves with our due humanity!
What does this mean? First, let me say that Sacks , in his prefacatory remarks, this is not a religious book , for which he has 'had to disrobe himself'. Actually, despite the lack of concentration on any specific ritualised or dogmatic view of Judaism, this is a deeply religious work. It reminds me of the Quaker (Christian) philosopher writings of j. Macmurray, the reinstatement of the interpersonal, as against the impersonality of individualism. This theme for Sacks too, would to this reader, appear to be the book's central theme. The finding of 'fellow-feeling', honour, security, and mutuality in the proper interstices of the individual/society/state mix.
Heartingly, after reading a not dissimilar work, Melanie Philips 'all must win prizes', contra Philips, Sack's does not invoke a moral wrath at contemporary failures to live the good life. As Sacks puts it, because we do not have the benefit of hindsight; because moral ideas take generations to come about; that we will make mistakes. Furthermore, that moral lanuage is only ever held with great inarticulacy. ie. we only partially codify the rules by which we behave, whilst we poke around in semi-darkness with sticks , such that the moral life can never come quite into focus. That does not prevent a brave , tireless, Dr sacks from making such a striking book - ironically enough, given his articuate use of language.
Comment | 
Was this review helpful to you?
Search Customer Reviews
Only search this product's reviews

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
Topic:
First post:
Prompts for sign-in
 


Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions
   
Related forums


Listmania!


Look for similar items by category


Look for similar items by subject


Feedback