- Paperback: 197 pages
- Publisher: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.; New Ed edition (14 Dec 2006)
- Language English
- ISBN-10: 0826492940
- ISBN-13: 978-0826492944
- Product Dimensions: 19.3 x 13 x 1.8 cm
- Average Customer Review: 4.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 884,660 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- See Complete Table of Contents
| |||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
Review
"'Furedi's arguments are cogent...Forcefully argued, Furedi's book is a thoughtful, if idealistic, consideration of the prevalence of fear mongering.' Publishers Weekly"
Product Description
The terms "left" and "right" pervade all our discussions of politics. But, argues Frank Furedi, these terms have lost their meaning - and in fact are often used to mean the opposite of what they once meant. For a grown-up politics we need to replace these terms with a less simplistic language. In this brilliant and provocative book, Furedi shows how modern politics revolves around the way we regard people. On the one hand are those increasingly vocal lobbies (not limited to any single party) who regard people as vulnerable - constantly in need of protection from risk, change and even knowledge itself. Against this view, Furedi urges a more confident, robust, politics based on the belief that, armed with knowledge and a willingness both to learn from the part and to face the future, humans are remarkably good at coping with crises and adapting to change. Whilst acknowledging the impoverished state of politics today and the pervasiveness of fear, this is ultimately Furedi's most optimistic work.
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
20 of 20 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
This work helps the individual realise that he/she is responsible for the politics of his/her country, as opposed to being the passive recipient of policies imposed on him/her from above, and over which he/she has no control. Furedi underlines that we can, and should, be the actors of change in our own society, and that our fears can be decreased by our taking a more active role in building our own destiny, and that of those around us.
9 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Format:Hardcover
Frank Furedi, formerly leader and founder of the small socialist group the Revolutionary Communist Party (Furedi), has written "Politics of Fear" as a new (left) Enlightenment manifesto for our times. Railing against the familiar claim of "There Is No Alternative", he traces this much further than mere neoliberalism. Instead, he argues that the past few decades have seen an enormously widening gap between the ideas of the elite that rule our Western nations and the people they govern, causing the former to be in confusion and doubt over their own values and vision and lack thereof, and the latter to be disenchanted and to retreat from the political sphere.
This in turn leads to a gradual erosion of democracy, when substantial party politics led by ideological vision is replaced by interest group lobbying, lifestyle-based politics and fearmongering. Furedi brilliantly pillories the elitist notions underlying such nice sounding concepts as "social inclusiveness" (which means papering over all conflict and disagreement), "participation and 'having your say'" (which gives everyone a voice, but nobody any real influence) as well as the much trumpeted importance of NGOs and the 'civil society', most of whose leadership consist of professional lobbyists and upper middle class administrators with no incentive to be democratic. He attaches to this a tirade against the politics of fear and a modern "conservatism of fear", which is caused, according to Furedi, because the ruling class has rejected both history (as evil) and the future (as dangerous), and has become so enmeshed in a worldview of total administration of individuals without vision or control that it has totally rejected any possibility of risk or change being good. The exact connection of this to the 'democracy deficit' is not really established, but can be imagined.
Unfortunately, this strongly worded book is marred by the usual flaws of modern 'left Enlightenment' dissent, namely an excessive reliance on the power and greatness of technological discoveries, severed from their social and economic context (i.e., scientism), and an insipid and juvenile anti-environmentalism. Also, Furedi occasionally goes so far in his rejection of the manipulations of the disaffected elite that he starts sounding positively like a liberal conservative, Hayekian style; for example in his outright rejection of government intervention in children's health and child-raising, which in my view are important and legitimate subjects for government intervention. The problem in these cases, as with environmental issues, is not government intervention, but intervention by the wrong government and on the wrong basis. If these flaws could be overcome, the Furedian humanism is one one could definitely subscribe to.
This in turn leads to a gradual erosion of democracy, when substantial party politics led by ideological vision is replaced by interest group lobbying, lifestyle-based politics and fearmongering. Furedi brilliantly pillories the elitist notions underlying such nice sounding concepts as "social inclusiveness" (which means papering over all conflict and disagreement), "participation and 'having your say'" (which gives everyone a voice, but nobody any real influence) as well as the much trumpeted importance of NGOs and the 'civil society', most of whose leadership consist of professional lobbyists and upper middle class administrators with no incentive to be democratic. He attaches to this a tirade against the politics of fear and a modern "conservatism of fear", which is caused, according to Furedi, because the ruling class has rejected both history (as evil) and the future (as dangerous), and has become so enmeshed in a worldview of total administration of individuals without vision or control that it has totally rejected any possibility of risk or change being good. The exact connection of this to the 'democracy deficit' is not really established, but can be imagined.
Unfortunately, this strongly worded book is marred by the usual flaws of modern 'left Enlightenment' dissent, namely an excessive reliance on the power and greatness of technological discoveries, severed from their social and economic context (i.e., scientism), and an insipid and juvenile anti-environmentalism. Also, Furedi occasionally goes so far in his rejection of the manipulations of the disaffected elite that he starts sounding positively like a liberal conservative, Hayekian style; for example in his outright rejection of government intervention in children's health and child-raising, which in my view are important and legitimate subjects for government intervention. The problem in these cases, as with environmental issues, is not government intervention, but intervention by the wrong government and on the wrong basis. If these flaws could be overcome, the Furedian humanism is one one could definitely subscribe to.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com:
1 review
4 of 7 people found the following review helpful
A left Enlightenment manifesto
16 April 2008
Format:Paperback
Frank Furedi, formerly leader and founder of the small socialist group the Revolutionary Communist Party (Furedi), has written "Politics of Fear" as a new (left) Enlightenment manifesto for our times. Railing against the familiar claim of "There Is No Alternative", he traces this much further than mere neoliberalism. Instead, he argues that the past few decades have seen an enormously widening gap between the ideas of the elite that rule our Western nations and the people they govern, causing the former to be in confusion and doubt over their own values and vision and lack thereof, and the latter to be disenchanted and to retreat from the political sphere.
This in turn leads to a gradual erosion of democracy, when substantial party politics led by ideological vision is replaced by interest group lobbying, lifestyle-based politics and fearmongering. Furedi brilliantly pillories the elitist notions underlying such nice sounding concepts as "social inclusiveness" (which means papering over all conflict and disagreement), "participation and 'having your say'" (which gives everyone a voice, but nobody any real influence) as well as the much trumpeted importance of NGOs and the 'civil society', most of whose leadership consist of professional lobbyists and upper middle class administrators with no incentive to be democratic. He attaches to this a tirade against the politics of fear and a modern "conservatism of fear", which is caused, according to Furedi, because the ruling class has rejected both history (as evil) and the future (as dangerous), and has become so enmeshed in a worldview of total administration of individuals without vision or control that it has totally rejected any possibility of risk or change being good. The exact connection of this to the 'democracy deficit' is not really established, but can be imagined.
Unfortunately, this strongly worded book is marred by the usual flaws of modern 'left Enlightenment' dissent, namely an excessive reliance on the power and greatness of technological discoveries, severed from their social and economic context (i.e., scientism), and an insipid and juvenile anti-environmentalism. Also, Furedi occasionally goes so far in his rejection of the manipulations of the disaffected elite that he starts sounding positively like a liberal conservative, Hayekian style; for example in his outright rejection of government intervention in children's health and child-raising, which in my view are important and legitimate subjects for government intervention. The problem in these cases, as with environmental issues, is not government intervention, but intervention by the wrong government and on the wrong basis. If these flaws could be overcome, the Furedian humanism is one I could definitely subscribe to. All readers interested in political culture should enjoy this book, in particular Will Podmore.
This in turn leads to a gradual erosion of democracy, when substantial party politics led by ideological vision is replaced by interest group lobbying, lifestyle-based politics and fearmongering. Furedi brilliantly pillories the elitist notions underlying such nice sounding concepts as "social inclusiveness" (which means papering over all conflict and disagreement), "participation and 'having your say'" (which gives everyone a voice, but nobody any real influence) as well as the much trumpeted importance of NGOs and the 'civil society', most of whose leadership consist of professional lobbyists and upper middle class administrators with no incentive to be democratic. He attaches to this a tirade against the politics of fear and a modern "conservatism of fear", which is caused, according to Furedi, because the ruling class has rejected both history (as evil) and the future (as dangerous), and has become so enmeshed in a worldview of total administration of individuals without vision or control that it has totally rejected any possibility of risk or change being good. The exact connection of this to the 'democracy deficit' is not really established, but can be imagined.
Unfortunately, this strongly worded book is marred by the usual flaws of modern 'left Enlightenment' dissent, namely an excessive reliance on the power and greatness of technological discoveries, severed from their social and economic context (i.e., scientism), and an insipid and juvenile anti-environmentalism. Also, Furedi occasionally goes so far in his rejection of the manipulations of the disaffected elite that he starts sounding positively like a liberal conservative, Hayekian style; for example in his outright rejection of government intervention in children's health and child-raising, which in my view are important and legitimate subjects for government intervention. The problem in these cases, as with environmental issues, is not government intervention, but intervention by the wrong government and on the wrong basis. If these flaws could be overcome, the Furedian humanism is one I could definitely subscribe to. All readers interested in political culture should enjoy this book, in particular Will Podmore.
Was this review helpful?
Let us know
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Look for similar items by subject
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
