Jan Hendrik Schön was hailed as the star of physics at the turn of the century. A string of amazing discoveries heralded a revolution in technology to rival the invention of the transistor. Working at Bell Labs - where the transistor was also invented - he published an astonishing number of papers in high-profile journals, each pushing back the known boundaries of science. He was awarded a string of prizes and people spoke of him as a future Nobel prize winner.
In 2002, following an investigation by a group of eminent scientists, Schön was sacked for committing scientific fraud. The news was reported around the world as one of the greatest scientific frauds ever. Many of his papers were retracted by journals because the data was fake. He was stripped of his doctorate by his University. His co-workers escaped with criticism, but with their reputation mainly intact.
Eugenie Samuel Reich tells the whole story in this fascinating, well written book. It is a real page-turner, tracing the scientific career of Schön from the beginning up to his disgrace. It is clearly based on a large number of interviews and a huge amount of source material. It can safely be assumed to be the definitive account of this story. Occasional excursions into the history of scientific fraud do not detract from the story - they actually amplify its effect.
Reich sensibly focuses on the story rather than the science. When descriptions of the science are necessary, she provides a concise explanation that allows the reader to understand which concepts are involved. As befitting a former writer for New Scientist, the science is well presented and accurate, within the limits of the book.
I have only one complaint about the book. In the introduction and epilogue, Reich refers to the "myth of science as an inevitably self-correcting process". While I would never say that science is "inevitably" self-correcting, the story in this book directly refutes the author's assertion.
Economists frequently refer to the "invisible hand" that guides markets. This is a convenient fiction that ignores the reality that markets are made up of people. Reich seems to regard science in the same abstract way, rather than recognise that it is a human-based activity. Her criticism of peer-reviewed journals was beautifully accurate and she justifiably exposed the plea of "wait for more data" as a mirage (in this case at least). But science is more than this - it involves humans. Humans talk to each other at conferences. They contact friends and colleagues at other laboratories. This is fully documented in the book and this is the way the fraud was exposed.
Science is a self-correcting process and - despite the author's assertion - this book is a wonderful example of the process in action.