£12.94
  • RRP: £13.99
  • You Save: £1.05 (8%)
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Philosophy of Religion for A2 Level Paperback – 7 May 2009


See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback
"Please retry"
£12.94
£9.25 £0.01

Frequently Bought Together

Philosophy of Religion for A2 Level + Philosophy of Religion for AS Level + OCR Philosophy of Religion for AS and A2
Price For All Three: £46.71

Some of these items are dispatched sooner than the others.

Buy the selected items together


Product details

  • Paperback: 174 pages
  • Publisher: Continuum (7 May 2009)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0826422713
  • ISBN-13: 978-0826422712
  • Product Dimensions: 17.4 x 1.2 x 24.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.6 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 117,433 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"The book is a testament to the authors' enthusiasm both for Philosophy in general and for the Philosophy of Religion in particular. The task of introducing philosophical methods and concepts with clarity and coherence is not easy, and the authors embrace it enthusiastically. Their delight in their subject is manifest... and the fruits of their experience are apparent in the text." Paul Fitzpatrick, Open House, August/September 2009.

About the Author

Michael B. Wilkinson lectures at Sussex Downs college and has over 30 years experience of teaching philosophical topics at university, seminary and college level. He is a senior examiner for a major awarding body and a Visiting Lecturer at the University of Brighton, UK. Hugh N. Campbell is a principal examiner for a major awarding body and has been teaching philosophy of religion for 20 years.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.6 out of 5 stars
5 star
3
4 star
2
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 5 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful By Michael Wilkinson on 13 Aug 2012
Format: Paperback
You may ignore the star rating but Murasaki's comments deserve a reply. I would say firstly that Murasaki does not engage with my arguments as given in the text for the views I hold, and misleadingly gives the impression that the entire book is about those issues.

In response to all points, my account of the views of authors is based entirely on their own statements. It has been my experience that authors' own statements are pretty good prima facie evidence of what they believe.

I think part of Murasaki's problem is to assume that if someone is not easily placed in this category, then he must be in some opposite one, which is a bit like saying that if someone is not a Rangers supporter then he must support Celtic - there are other options.

1. On the Falsification debate, Murasaki is guilty of selective quotation. I invite a second look at the grammar of the Falsification debate. Nowhere does Flew assert that believers do not permit their beliefs to be falsified: he says that it often seems to people who are not religious as if there were no occurrence that would count as a disproof of the existence of God. Note the 'often' is not 'always'. But the important grammatical point is that Flew goes on to ask a question: "I therefore put to the succeeding symposiasts the simple central questions,'What would have to occur or to have occurred to constitute for you a disproof of the love of, or of the existence of, God?'". The point is that this is a question rather than any statement of a view.
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Lawrence Finn on 6 Sep 2010
Format: Paperback
This is an excellent product which I would strongly recommend to anyone studying A level philosophy - along with the AS edition!

It provides a clear, insightful yet concise exploration of all the key topics specified in the OCR syallabus to help embellish notes copied from a standard - and most probably, a far chunkier text book! It contains all the 'juicy' details not always present within such text books, which the examiner wants to see but should definitely be used in combination with another text book for best results. This is not because it lacks any major content - simply because, for the sake of concision - the authors can't include all information available on the subject.

If you're still not convinced then let me tell you that it was largely because of this book that I managed to achieve an A in the subject (which I was very content with!)
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Al on 22 Jun 2010
Format: Paperback
not sure how it'd work in a lower set, but am sure it would be great with clever students;
takes a lot for granted: no illustrations, no glossary, no insulting 'thought points', but some very useful exam/essay advice;
OCR slant, but, as it would need supplementing with more accessible material, could be used for other boards;
in any case am going to try at least the A2 half with an average class next term: can't resist it...
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
There is no such thing as the perfect book, but this is a good textbook that is pitched at the able student but will not bemuse the less able. It is well written, includes all the major infomation and does not pretend to be what it is not. We use it with an able class and supplement it with our own resources and extracts from other textbooks.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 2 people found the following review helpful By Murasaki53 on 3 April 2010
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
TO ANYONE WHO MIGHT ENCOUNTER THIS REVIEW: ONE OF THE AUTHORS OF THE BOOK HAS RESPONDED SO THOUGHTFULLY TO THE CRITICISMS I ORIGINALLY MADE OF IT THAT I HAVE BEEN HAPPY TO ALTER MY RATING TO A MORE POSITIVE ONE. I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO APOLOGISE TO MR WILKINSON FOR THE RATHER MEAN-SPIRITED TONE OF THE COMMENTS BELOW. MY CONCERNS ORIGINALLY AROSE BECAUSE OF WHAT I BEGAN TO UNCOVER WHEN I STARTED TO READ AROUND THE TOPICS A LITTLE, AS WHAT I FOUND IN THE SECONDARY (AND OCCASIONALLY PRIMARY LITERATURE) SEEMED MUCH AT VARIANCE WITH POINTS THE AUTHORS WERE EMPHASISING, WHICH IN TURN GAVE ME CAUSE TO DOUBT THEM. HAVING READ THROUGH MR WILKINSON'S VERY DETAILED RESPONSE, I NOW FEEL COMPLETELY REASSURED. IN FACT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO DELETE THIS REVIEW ENTIRELY, WERE IT NOT FOR THE FACT THAT MR WILKINSON SEEMED SO COMMITTED IN HIS REPLY TO SEEKING CLARITY ABOUT THE ISSUES DISCUSSED (RATHER THAN MERELY ENGAGING IN THE KIND OF POINT-SCORING A PHILOSOPHICAL QUARREL OFTEN CAN DESCEND INTO), THAT PERHAPS OUR EXCHANGE SHOULD BE PRESERVED. IN FACT, I HAVE RECENTLY PURCHASED SEVERAL COPIES OF THIS BOOK (AND THE EQUIVALENT A/S TITLE) AND THESE ARE CURRENTLY BEING PUT TO GOOD USE BY OUR A/S AND A2 STUDENTS. IT ONLY REMAINS FOR ME TO APOLOGISE A SECOND TIME FOR NOT AMENDING THIS REVIEW MORE PROMPTLY. I'M SO BUSY THAT I HAVE HAD TO WAIT UNTIL HALF-TERM TO DO SO.

Right at the beginning of this book, these authors make a big song and dance about 4 'myths' that their book is trying to 'correct'. First of all, they dispute the claim that 'falsification is about meaning'. Well, this may be true for Karl Popper but is it for Antony Flew (who is central to the A2 syllabus on this very issue)?
Here is a little quotation from 'Theology and Falsification':
"..
Read more ›
1 Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Feedback