Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Philosophy of Religion Paperback – Mar 2002

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
£341.26 £119.41

Product details

More About the Authors

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 5 reviews
18 of 18 people found the following review helpful
Excellent, but... 4 Jun 2003
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Hardcover
...way too advanced for an undergrad like me. This book is an excellent resource for intelligent Christians. Don't get me wrong, I eventually get what is being discussed in the essays, it just takes me a long time.
I don't really understand what the criticism of the earlier reviewer was with regard to Dr. Craig's opinions concerning morality. Dr. Craig has successfully defended his beliefs on morality against his foremost opponents. (I don't know how you can argue for an objective and non-arbitrary morality if you hold a naturalistic worldview.)
I recommend this book to anybody interested in current discussion of philosophy of religion topics. Just be warned if you are not already well versed in elite philosophical terminology: it may take you a while to make it through!
17 of 19 people found the following review helpful
Outstanding Contemporary Selections 26 Mar 2002
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
William Lane Craig and his section editors (Kevin Meeker, J.P. Moreland, Michael Murray, and Timothy O'Connor) have assembled a truly excellent set of readings in contemporary analytic philosophy of religion. The introductions to each section serve as overviews of main areas within philosophy of religion, and the readings represent some of the very best work being done in the field today. It would be a very valuable addition to the library of anyone who is interested in the subject--even if you already own some of its rivals (e.g. Pojman's Wadsworth anthology or the Oxford text edited by Basdinger, Hasker, Peterson, and Reichenbach).
Craig mentions in the introduction that he was more interested in choosing quality articles than in making sure to give the pro and con of every issue, and the result is that the selections are weighted in favor of (Christian) theism. Someone who is looking for a text that is perfectly balanced in its approach may be disappointed with the editors' choices. Insofar as this is the case, the book should be viewed by philosophically-inclined theists as an indespensible resource. And in spite of its mild bias, it would make an outstanding primary text for an upper division undergraduate or graduate course in philosophy of religion.
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful
Craig is the leading apologist of our time 18 April 2003
By cole houx - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
William Lane Craig does a masterful job in his section on Natural Theology. He presents a cumulative case for God's existence by including Alvin Plantinga's modal version of the Ontological Argument. ( Although some philosophers have corectly pointed out that his argument is really Cosmological in nature because it presupposes that something exists. One can only know that a poissible world exists on the background knowledge of an actual world.) Plantinga believes that if it is even possible that a maxamally great being exists, then it is true and necessarily true that he does exist. The only question is what warrant exists in thinking that there is a possible world in which a maxamally great being exists. Here is where Craig hammers the nails in the coffin. Based on the other arguments and evidential considerations one may come to the justified conclusion that it is at least possible that a maxamally great being exists. That there is a possible world in which an eternal necessary being exists. Since this being exists necessarily, then he must exist in every possible world. And since the real world is a possible world, then it follows that God exists.
For a more detailed and better treatment on this subject I would recommend Craig's section on Natural Theology in this text. See also Philosophical Foundations for a Christian Worldview by Craig and Moreland ( 2003 ).
The rest of the book is pretty good also. Although it is a little rough at times.
Philosophy 18 July 2012
By Charles E. Greer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Philosophy of Religion present many different ideas and explanations of religion. A Reader and Guide is as it proclaims to be. Read this book. EG
15 of 26 people found the following review helpful
good for advanced Christian students & atheistic profs 13 Jun 2002
By A Customer - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
As the other reviewer mentioned, this text is quite "one sided." The editors are intentional in this move however: they say they would have liked a "pro"-theism and a "con"-theism article(s) for each section, but they only wanted the BEST articles as well, so the "con" articles--those critical of arguments for theism--had to go.
While this might be a bad thing, it could be useful for an instructor who is an agnostic or atheist since using this book could be a way to avoid students accusing the instructor of being "biased" or "one-sided."
For the price, this is a good collection but only for graduate students or VERY, VERY advanced undergraduates with quite a bit of logical and metaphysical sophistication. J.P. Moreland's introduction to his "Soul and Life Everlasting" section is just too difficult for anyone without a very strong background in philosophy of mind and metaphysics. Beginning to mid-level students will be lost quickly and a handful of other courses are needed to bring them back.
Tim O'Connor's introduction to the problem of evil is quite good and is highly recommended. He brings a fresh perspective to the issues. This is one of the best essays in the book.
The section on religious epistemology is a bit quirky in that 2 out of the 4 articles are on Pascal's wager. That seems a bit out of step with what's currently in epistemological fashion (it seems like a practical wager like Pascal's has little to do with epistemology anyway). The other 2 articles are the standard Plantinga-Quinn exchange on whether theistic belief is or can be "properly" basic for intellectually sophisticated adults. Newer stuff surely could have occupied this space.
Wiliam Lane Craig's section on natural theology is good, although one critical comment must be made. In all the books of his I've seen, he repeatedly tries to argue that either (A) moral values are entirely "subjective" or "relative" or merely a "human convention" or (B) they are "rooted in" or depend on God's commands. This dilemma is ridiculous and Craig should know that: in fact, he suggests a third option, that moral values are "objective." In fact, moral realism--that there are moral facts independent of God's command--best explains why God would command what he would command. Craig's arguments that moral values cannot be objective without God's existence are very poor and he is disengenuous in presenting them.
Again, for the price you get some good papers and a big fat book. For a bit more money, however, you can get something with both "sides" in it which would be better for most classroom use.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know