Philosophy of Religion: A Contemporary Introduction and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
£90.00
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Philosophy of Religion: A... has been added to your Basket
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Philosophy of Religion: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy) Hardcover – 26 Nov 1998

4 customer reviews

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£90.00
£79.25 £98.99
£90.00 FREE Delivery in the UK. Temporarily out of stock. Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.



Product details

  • Hardcover: 424 pages
  • Publisher: Routledge (26 Nov. 1998)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0415132134
  • ISBN-13: 978-0415132138
  • Product Dimensions: 15.6 x 2.4 x 23.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 2.8 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (4 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 8,295,784 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"The central strength of the book is its willingness to argue points out in detail rather than just reporting on arguments. It is a model of rigorous argument applied to questions of religion."-Mark Wynn, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane ..."Yandell's book stands out as an exemplary work in analytical philosophy of religion and readers of this journal ["Philosophia Christi] are indebted to his considerable philosophical acumen...[Yandell] takes us a good way down the path to appreciating the philosophical power of theism. ..."Philosophy of Religion: A Contemporary Introduction is a fine text of interest to the specialist and, with a little help in the classroom, a refreshing resource for students."-Charles Taliaferro, St. Olaf College "Philosophia Christi, Spring 2003

About the Author

Keith E. Yandell is professor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin at Madison

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
First Sentence
No noncontroversial answer is possible, and this is not a book about what philosophy is. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

2.8 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

9 of 12 people found the following review helpful By A Customer on 7 July 2002
Format: Paperback
The first thing that struck me about this book was that it is much fatter than any of the other volumes in the "Routledge Contemporary Introduction to Philosophy" Series. This doesn't turn out to be too much of a problem, because it is quite easy to read. But there, just about anything positive that I have to say about it ends. It is probably one of the worst Philosophy books, in any subdiscipline of the subject, that I have ever read. Having a DPhil and and MA in Philosophy, I have read a lot.
There are a wide number of issues within the Philosophy of Religion that simply aren't addressed here. The problem of Religious Language is perhaps the most glaring, because a proper consideration of it might have tempered Yandell's hard-headed "positivistic" approach to religion - he treats religious creeds as scientific-type propositions which can be straightforwardly verified or falsified. Such an approach is not obviously wrong, but it requires a preliminary justification that only a rigorous examination of the status of religious language would be able to supply. As a result of this, Non-Cognitivist approaches are summarily dismissed on breathtakingly slender grounds.
In the section on the problem of evil, he consistently fails to distinguish 'evil' and 'suffering', with the result that many of his arguments just don't work. And he invents new (non) problems for the readers edification, such as - is God evil because he allows the extinction of species? Why the extinction of species should matter more than the extinction of individuals, or more than the sort of evil outlined in Dostoyevsky's 'The Brothers Karamazov' (the classic source for the philosophical formulation of the problem, but which nowhere appears in this work), we are not told.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
The book was described as showing some wear - it had obviously been used, but was absolutely fine - a few marks on the outer edges of the pages were no problem. It was very reasonably priced and came when it was supposed to. All good.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful By AD2015 on 10 May 2009
Format: Paperback
If you're considering this book, there's a reasonable chance you'll have an understanding of philosophical terms. If so, can you tell what the sentence "X holds that having a mental property is kind-defining relative to the only kind of substances there are" is describing?

The answer is idealism, and this must be the poorest expression of it I've yet seen. Expand that type of language-abuse up to the scope of the book, and you have a title that is deeply frustrating to read, even by the low standards of philosophical writing. It also falls prey to the nasty tendency of analytic philosophy by attempting to rebut all possible objections by defining every conceivable term in advance. Such efforts never make the ship watertight, but they do leave it too heavy to float.

Sadly, the content does not reward the effort required to read it. Even when parsed carefully out, and taking in plenty of additional reading to understand exactly what the author is trying to say, the results are poor. The discussion of the cosmological argument is a masterpiece of that awful analytic game of chisholming the poor sentences into submission, until A''''' bears no relation to A, and certainly no relation to sense.

I would counsel against purchasing this book, and if it's the set text for your course, switch while you have the chance!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Peter B Ball on 11 Nov. 2003
Format: Hardcover
Professor Yandell offers a clear, detailed, accessible and robust account of the philosophy of religion in its global, multi-faith context. The sections on Buddhism are especially useful and informative to someone coming from from a Christian background.
His style is engaging and logical, being accessible to the intelligent non-philosopher as well as to the specialist.
This introductory work gives a much more global perspective on philosophy of religion than is usual in an introductory volume and for that reason alone is quite exceptional.
Full marks for a provocative, thoughtful and insightful introduction to the subject!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 5 reviews
32 of 35 people found the following review helpful
A Breath Of Critical Fresh Air 6 Sept. 2001
By James S. Taylor - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
What a refreshing change of pace. Yandell is not cowed at all by modern politically correct views of how to handle (or rather, avoid handling) real religious views. Christian, Hindu, Buddhist and Jain views all are surveyed, then come under review for various tests of whether or not they are viable options for belief. What seems solid stands; what doesn't gets a polite and serious discussion of its weaknesses. As noted, a value is that, unlike many philosophy of religion books, this one jumps clearly outside the typical coverage of Western theistic religions and gives Eastern views the respectful discussion they deserve. Any criticisms, on all sides, are handled with scholarly acumen, lack of insult, and are argued in detail. This book will make you think on issues deeply. I think that Buddhists, particularly those from debate oriented traditions (like Theravada or Tibetan) will particularly enjoy developing a response to his discussions on the evidential lack of value to meditation experiences, and to his in detail analysis of why he thinks the Buddhist view of persons is not adequate. It's rare that religious groups who actually enjoy a real challenge are given one, but here is one worth your time. As for criticisms of theistic issues, such as the general failure of traditional arguments for God's existence, there's not as much unique here that hasn't been said in other works covering the topic. Over all, however, this is an excellent book for someone capeable of thinking philosophically at a college or university level.
6 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Solid Work 12 May 2009
By Reader From Aurora - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Keith Yandell's Philosophy of Religion is an instalment in the Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy series. This series is intended to help students transition from introductory to higher level philosophical study. From my perspective the book is a mixed success; it has some clear strength as well as some shortcomings.

With respect to strengths, the scope of the discussion, the criticism of religious pluralism and the handling of Hinduism and Buddhism are noteworthy. First, with regard to scope, often discussions within the philosophy of religion are limited to Western monotheistic traditions for reasons of comfort and applicability (more amenable to rational analysis), Yandell's move beyond this traditional area with the inclusion of Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism is helpful.

Second, the debunking of religious pluralism. Not pluralism in the sense that there is a variety of religions - clearly this is the case - but, rather, in the sense that the different religions are compatible. This notion of compatibility is appealing for many commentators - if true, it would seem to allow for greater toleration and acceptance between faith groups and cultures. As Yandell notes, however, beyond trivial assertion such as the denial of physicalism, the different traditions are incompatible. Broadly speaking, religions offer two things, an assessment of the human condition and a recommendation for its rectification. Even considered superficially the problem/solution claims of the different religions appear irreconcilable. For example Christianity posits sin as the problem and divine forgiveness as the cure, while Buddhism frames the problem as a sense of permanence and the solution as awareness of the transitory nature of existence. It would appear that the only way that these traditions can be equally valid is if they are all incorrect - which does seem to be the underlying contention of religious pluralism.

Third, the application of Western rational criticism to the different Eastern tradition raises interesting and important questions. For instance Yandell argues persuasively that Advaita Vedanta (Monistic) Hinduism and Theravada Buddhism are incoherent from a rational perspective. That is, in the Hindu view, how can things that posses a multiplicity of qualities be equivalent to qualityless Braham? While with regard to Buddhism what is to be made of notions such as karma and the wheel of life in the absence of true personhood? If all there is are transitory bundles of non-enduring states, to what does karma accrue, and, what is liberated from the wheel of life? These are important and interesting questions that warrant greater consideration.

With regard to drawbacks, Yandell occasionally slips into an excessively analytic style; this is especially the case when discussing Western Monotheism. While understandable given that the arguments in this area are well rehearsed this approach may strike some readers as unnecessarily pedantic and a bit irksome. I imagine that many readers in the target audience (relatively new undergrads), would find some of this argumentation discouraging and confusing. And last, the text seems to peter out in a rather disjointed manner; a subsequent edition would benefit from a concluding chapter to bring together the text's many threads.

Overall, a good read with some valuable insights. I recommend it for readers seeking a critical and contemporary discussion of the philosophy of religion
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Rigorous philosophical argumentation 6 May 2014
By Doug Erlandson - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Keith Yandell's "Philosophy of Religion: A Contemporary Introduction" is best suited as a text in an upper-division college-level philosophy of religion course. Students who are not already familiar with philosophy in general and the approach to issues found in contemporary Anglo-American philosophy in particular will find the argumentation difficult to follow.

Having said this by way of warning, I will note that Yandell approaches the various standard topics covered in the philosophy of religion with a great deal of intellectual rigor. He is right up there with the best in his ability to show the logical progression of arguments and thereby demonstrate why certain arguments fail to establish their conclusions while others succeed. For someone willing to put in the time and effort, this can be a rewarding work. Unlike some philosophy of religion texts, this one makes ample reference to non-Western religions and evaluates them fairly.
3 of 7 people found the following review helpful
Terribly tedious and in error 3 Mar. 2013
By Will Jerom - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I thought this was a terribly dull book, taking an interesting subject and rendering it into bland propositional logic. The only person who would find this useful is a philosophy professor for a logic class. If you are not a professor of logic, nor do you like proposition logic, then don't buy this book, plain and simple. Additionally: this book is not useful from the standpoint of religion, as it denudes, crassly reduces, and otherwise lazily interprets religion according to an over-simplified symbolic scheme. Yandell's style of propositional logic I find highly boring, and his definitions and assumptions highly questionable if not erroneous. A book of 40% this length could have been much more meaningful, and much more accurate. If you are looking for a good book in philosophy of religion, try Andrew Eshleman, Louis Pojman, or Michael Peterson. Or go read Houston Smith's book on world religion and critically think about it yourself. Any of these choices (almost any choice at all!) would be more meaningful, and probably more accurate and honestly representative of world religion than Yandell's awful work here.
2 of 15 people found the following review helpful
bogged down in logic and syllogisms 17 Dec. 2010
By Emerito D. Posadas - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I was expecting a book which is supposed to be enlightening about religions in general. What I got however is philosophical jargon which confuses instead of clarifies. i do not recommend this book .
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know


Feedback