FREE Delivery in the UK.
Temporarily out of stock.
Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
Quantity:1
Philosophy of Art: A Cont... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Good | Details
Sold by Nearfine
Condition: Used: Good
Comment: A good reading copy. May contain markings or be a withdrawn library copy. Expect delivery in 2-4 weeks.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction (Routledge Contemporary Introductions to Philosophy) Hardcover – 16 Sep 1999

5 customer reviews

See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover
"Please retry"
£90.00
£74.95 £42.49
£90.00 FREE Delivery in the UK. Temporarily out of stock. Order now and we'll deliver when available. We'll e-mail you with an estimated delivery date as soon as we have more information. Your account will only be charged when we dispatch the item. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Win a £5,000 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card for your child's school by voting for their favourite book. Learn more.
  • Prepare for the summer with our pick of the best selection for children (ages 0 - 12) across Amazon.co.uk.


Win a £5,000 Amazon.co.uk Gift Card and 30 Kindle E-readers for your child or pupil's school.
Vote for your child or pupil(s) favourite book(s) here to be in with a chance to win.

Product details

  • Hardcover: 288 pages
  • Publisher: Routledge (16 Sept. 1999)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0415159636
  • ISBN-13: 978-0415159630
  • Product Dimensions: 15.6 x 1.8 x 23.4 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.2 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (5 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 4,678,869 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
  • See Complete Table of Contents

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

Review

"The book's strength is its concise and straightforward deciphering of a variety of representations in a dense manner."-Choice, May 2000

From the Back Cover

Philosophy of Art is a textbook for undergraduate students interested in the topic of philosophical aesthetics. It introduces the techniques of analytical philosophy in addition to a selection of major topics in the field. These include the representational theory of art, formalism, neo-formalism, aesthetic theories of art, neo-Wittgensteinism, the Institutional Theory of Art, as well as historical approaches to the nature of art. Throughout the book, abstract philosophical theories are illustrated by examples from theatre, architecture, painting, music, the decorative arts and photography. These references to both traditional and contemporary art forms, including the avant-garde, enriches the reader's understanding of art theory as well as the appreciation of art. --This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Inside This Book

(Learn More)
First Sentence
The earliest known theories of art in Western philosophy were proposed by Plato and his student Aristotle. Read the first page
Explore More
Concordance
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index
Search inside this book:

Customer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

7 of 7 people found the following review helpful By J. J. Ward on 16 July 2012
Format: Paperback
I read this book at least five years ago, and the only thing that's prompted me to review it is revisting it here on Amazon (I didn't buy it from here originally - sorry - but from the Sussex university bookshop, where I was trying to complete my Phd), and finding the only person who reviewed it had given it a lousy two stars. Shame on you, whoever you are.

Carroll's Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction is an easy-to-read, non-patronising, highly thoughtful, reflective look at the major positions in the field. It left me feeling I wanted to find out more. It left me feeling I'd been led through the territory by a friend. I felt more intelligent for having read it. And yes, I completed my Phd. I'd thoroughly recommend it. Five stars, without hesitation.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Paul Bowes TOP 500 REVIEWER on 19 Nov. 2013
Format: Paperback
Noël Carroll introduces the reader to the philosophy of art by examining in turn the most influential modern attempts to define art. He makes the point that there has been very little agreement concerning these matters, and that this suggests that there may be a fundamental difficulty with all definitional approaches to art. Having carefully examined various alternatives - representationalism, formalism, neo-Wittgensteinianism, institutional theory and so on - noting their strengths and weaknesses, and how their advocates have responded to critics, he concludes by suggesting an alternative, narrational approach that may avoid the problems created when we insist on a single, universal definition of art.

There are many introductory texts in this area, but I think that this is one of the more substantial. The author is a Professor of the Philosophy of Art, and a well-known figure in the area. His book is aimed primarily at undergraduate students of the arts, or of philosophy. Nonetheless, it should be accessible to any intelligent adult reader with a genuine interest in the subject who is willing to read carefully and is not intimidated by line-by-line argumentation. Its strength is not so much that it argues for any given approach - though obviously the author favours his own - as that it forces the reader to see how complex the apparently simple process of art appreciation really is, and why easy definitions continue to elude us.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful By G. N. Bailey on 22 Dec. 2012
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
We get an overview of the philosophical approach followed by various routes io a definition of what is art or an artistic object. It's pretty dense arguing, but what do ou expect? At the end the author presents his own view. A good introduction to this area of philosophy'
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
By M. Bergman on 15 Nov. 2014
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
great thank you!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
8 of 22 people found the following review helpful By Ashtar Command on 26 Dec. 2010
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This book, written by a philosophy professor, is filled with circular reasoning that would be spotted by a ten year old.

For instance, the author rejects the representational theory of art with the argument, that some art isn't representational. Therefore, the representational theory must be wrong. Easy, right?

Wrong. The whole point of the representational theory is that non-representational art *isn't* art. Carroll's argument is therefore a non sequitur. Essentially, he just says: "YES, IT IS". To which the representationalist will respond: "NO, IT ISN'T". Quite a debate!

Carroll assumes what needs to be proven: that the avantgarde is art. Duchamp's ready-mades and "Two Minutes of Silence" are art. Why? No idea. Because Carroll and modernist art critics say so, presumably. Therefore, definitions of art which would exclude Duchamp and the Silent Guy cannot be correct. QED.

That's an argument?

When the chips are down, Carroll cannot even present a definition of his own, at least not a coherent one. Carroll believes that design isn't art. Why not? Many people would disagree. But perhaps they aren't part of the cognoscenti Art Circle. He further believes that a traffic sign used as a wall decoration wouldn't be art. Again, why not?

What is art? Perhaps the question cannot be given a clear answer. And then, perhaps it can. How come the public after 100 years of modernist indoctrination still doesn't consider the modernist monstrosities to be "art"? Carroll implies that such people are simply silly and philistine. Another possibility is that modern and postmodern art simply doesn't appeal to some kind of aesthetic, symbolic or ritual instincts deeply embedded in our psyches. In plain English: no, Noël, it really isn't "art" after all!
2 Comments Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again


Feedback