In his introduction Fowler is somewhat scathing of Stephen King- claiming his style has all the finesse of an orthapedic shoe, but that some of his ideas make reasonable films. He seems to think (and indeed says) that he himself is doing something more daring, more 'challenging'. His horror fiction is not 'the normal sort'. OK, horror short fiction doesn't have to be werewolves, vampires etc, but sorry, I'd still like to have a plot. Reasonable dialogue. Some form of structure. Development. Perhaps the occasional juicy little surprise. Not much of that on show here. What's in this book is a series of stories with fairly basic ideas which are not developed. They range from the blindingly obvious (the hotel owner taking revenge on people he feels are responsible for his bad fortune: get this- he poisons them...challenging enough?), to the surreal (a lottery winner wins a horrible fate.) I can handle surreal, and some of my favourite short stories are very much open ended. But they are so for a reason... King may not be the most elegant of prose writers, but he knows how to tell a story, and he can keep you turning the page... there wasn't one story here that worked for me. If you are looking for truely challenging horror short fiction which is not concerned with the traditional elements of horror fiction i'd recommend trying the Borderlands series edited by Thomas F Montelone.