Reflecting on the Labor government of Harold Wilson between 1964 and 1970, this concise analysis chronicles the Labor Party from its early days up to the early 1960s, including a 1972 postscript. Demonstrating how empirical and flexible the Labor Party has been about certain issues, this reference also touches on how it is one of the most dogmatic political parties in regards to the parliamentary system. Commenting on why its leaders have always made devotion to this system their fixed point of reference, this political overview proves that this has always been the conditioning factor of their political behavior, as they consistently reject any kind of political action which has fallen outside the framework and conventions of Parliament. Stating that there is no distinction to be made between Labor’s political and industrial leaders, this study illustrates the party as it is now and has always been—one of modest social reform in a capitalist system within whose confines it is ever more firmly and by now irrevocably rooted.
| ||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. Learn more. |
Book Description
Frequently Bought Together
Product details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
Product Description
About the Author
Ralph Miliband was one of the key intellectual figures of the British New Left and the founder of the Socialist Register. He was a professor at the London School of Economics, Brandeis University, York University–Toronto, and the Graduate Centre of the City University of New York and was chair of politics at the University of Leeds. He is the author of Divided Societies: Class Struggle in Contemporary Capitalism, Marxism and Politics, and Socialism for a Sceptical Age. He is the coeditor of A Dictionary of Marxist Thought.
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 20 people found the following review helpful
By S P Mead
Format:Paperback
This book is a study on the politics of the Labour Party; specifically, it examines Labour's ideas, values, practices and policies concerning the Party's brand of "socialism". Labour's "socialism" is exposed as having little or nothing to do with the transformation of capitalist society in a genuine socialist direction - rather, for Labour "socialism" means only the inclusion of representatives of the working class (alongside representatives of other classes) participating in the parliamentary process.
Yes, Labour's "socialism" is shown to encompass social reforms - but, for Labour, the purpose of socialist ideas and practices is merely to reform the existing order of things, not to bring about any sort of radical alternative. This type of reformism differs from the objectives of many other European social democratic parties founded between 1880 and 1914, which considered such reforms as a means to bring about a revolutionary transition. This form of European social democracy was distinct from both (1) the revisionist politics of Labour, and (2) the insurrectionary strategies of the Bolsheviks.
Miliband provides an excellent discussion on the historical development of Labour - from its formation in the late 19th century, based on certain reformist and revisionist ideals and ethics, through to its advance as a leading political party in Britain by the mid 20th century. This discussion is comprehensive, well referenced, and will still serve as a useful tool for students of the history of early to mid 20th century British politics and the labour movement.
Miliband found that the purpose of narrow reform and revision, in and of itself, is inherently conservative - and he defined this brand of limited socialism as "Labourism" - distinct from proper, genuine socialism. Given the dominance of Labour as a representative of the working class, Miliband concluded that the interests of this class - the building of socialism - cannot be arrived at through Labour. Indeed, there is an implicit argument made that socialism cannot be achieved through parliamentary means - although nowhere is this view explicitly advanced, and elsewhere Miliband accepts the use of parliamentary strategies in the advance of socialist goals.
First published in 1964, this book became a "standard" on the Left for its understanding of Labour. Miliband subsequently wrote a useful postscript, updating his discussion so as to encompass the 1960's - when, once again, Labour was in office. I repeat, anyone interested in the Labour Party or British politics during this period should read this book.
For a more recent study, and one that in many ways can be seen as bringing Miliband's analysis fully up to date, see "The End of Parliamentary Socialism" by Panitch and Leys (2001).
Yes, Labour's "socialism" is shown to encompass social reforms - but, for Labour, the purpose of socialist ideas and practices is merely to reform the existing order of things, not to bring about any sort of radical alternative. This type of reformism differs from the objectives of many other European social democratic parties founded between 1880 and 1914, which considered such reforms as a means to bring about a revolutionary transition. This form of European social democracy was distinct from both (1) the revisionist politics of Labour, and (2) the insurrectionary strategies of the Bolsheviks.
Miliband provides an excellent discussion on the historical development of Labour - from its formation in the late 19th century, based on certain reformist and revisionist ideals and ethics, through to its advance as a leading political party in Britain by the mid 20th century. This discussion is comprehensive, well referenced, and will still serve as a useful tool for students of the history of early to mid 20th century British politics and the labour movement.
Miliband found that the purpose of narrow reform and revision, in and of itself, is inherently conservative - and he defined this brand of limited socialism as "Labourism" - distinct from proper, genuine socialism. Given the dominance of Labour as a representative of the working class, Miliband concluded that the interests of this class - the building of socialism - cannot be arrived at through Labour. Indeed, there is an implicit argument made that socialism cannot be achieved through parliamentary means - although nowhere is this view explicitly advanced, and elsewhere Miliband accepts the use of parliamentary strategies in the advance of socialist goals.
First published in 1964, this book became a "standard" on the Left for its understanding of Labour. Miliband subsequently wrote a useful postscript, updating his discussion so as to encompass the 1960's - when, once again, Labour was in office. I repeat, anyone interested in the Labour Party or British politics during this period should read this book.
For a more recent study, and one that in many ways can be seen as bringing Miliband's analysis fully up to date, see "The End of Parliamentary Socialism" by Panitch and Leys (2001).
Customer Discussions
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
Listmania!
|
|
Look for similar items by category
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
|
