Palson Risotto rice and v... has been added to your Basket
Quantity:1

Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon

Palson Risotto rice and vegetables cooker 1.8 litres

by Palson
3 out of 5 stars 2 customer reviews

Price: £31.12 & FREE Delivery in the UK. Details
Only 2 left in stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.
1 used from £20.99
  • Large capacity: 1.8l
  • Glass lid with safety valve
  • Removable basket handles for easy storage
  • 2 baskets and special tray for rice and vegetables
  • High-quality, non-stick surface

 kitchen appliances  kitchen appliances

£31.12 & FREE Delivery in the UK. Details Only 2 left in stock. Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Product Information

Technical Details
Brand Palson
Model Number30472
ColourWhite
Item Weight3 Kg
Product Dimensions29 x 28.6 x 28 cm
Capacity1.5 litres
Volume Capacity1.8 litres
Special Featuresmanual
  
Additional Information
ASINB000G7P78M
Best Sellers Rank 1,541,677 in Kitchen & Home (See top 100)
Shipping Weight3.1 Kg
Delivery Destinations:Visit the Delivery Destinations Help page to see where this item can be delivered.
Date First Available12 Jun. 2006
  
 

Customer Reviews

3.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
1
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

By HASAN on 6 Jun. 2013
Verified Purchase
great product for less money, I am amazed by the quality of the product. will recommend to other even I am planing to buy another for myself.
Comment 1 of 1 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
i looked at this on amazon , decided to take a chance , BAD move ,it boils over spilling startch residue everywhere !!!! if i lived in UK it would be returned , here in portugal , it's in the bin , not woRth the hassle to return !!!!!!!!! BE WARNED
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse