Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Tell the Publisher!
Id like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Out of the Desert: Archaeology and the Exodus/Conquest Narratives [Hardcover]

William H. Stiebing

Available from these sellers.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Hardcover --  
Paperback 23.64  

Book Description

31 July 1989
Two of the best-known stories in the Bible are those of Moses leading his people out of Egypt and Joshua's conquest of the Promised Land. Indeed, they form one of the cornerstones of the Judeo-Christian tradition. But is the Bible a reliable source of information for Israel's early history? Are the Exodus and Conquest actual historical events? And if they are, when and where did they occur?

Out of the Desert? rigorously examines accounts of these historic events and traces the authenticity, dates, and explanations for the Israelites' departure from Egypt and subsequent conquest of Canaan. Clarifying these events in a straightforward, informative manner, Out of the Desert? includes a generous number of charts and illustrations.

William H. Stiebing, Jr. places the Exodus within its cultural context during the beginning of the Iron Age (1200-1100 B.C.), a time of drought, famine and collapse of social order, which gave way to the emergence and dominance of the tribes that joined forces to become the confederation of Israel.

Many conventional ideas concerning the Exodus and Conquest are radically challenged in Out of the Desert?. Stiebing's accounts of archaeological digs and rival theories make the narrative lively and engrossing; his unique insight into the field of modern archaeology provides a rare glimpse into the wonders of man's history.
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.

Product details

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store

If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store. Learn more

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on Amazon.co.uk.
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
Amazon.com: 4.7 out of 5 stars  3 reviews
7 of 7 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Biblical History Examined 6 Oct 2000
By "kingsransom" - Published on Amazon.com
This book is an overview of attempts to place the events described in the biblical Exodus and Conquest narratives in the archaeological record. Arguments for and against both the traditional 15th century dating and the newer 13th century dating are given. Some of the wilder theories are also discussed, from Velikovsky's catastrophism to attempts to date the Conquest to the end of the Early Bronze I period (c. 2300 BC). The final conclusion is that the bulk of the Exodus and Conquest narratives can not be historical.
As a readable introduction to the history and archaeology of Israelite origins, with a lot of background information on Egypt and Palestine in the second half of the 2nd millenium BC, this work is recommended to anyone interested in near-Eastern ancient history or Old Testament biblical studies.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Out Of The Desert Review 5 Aug 2002
By cjemail@lycos.com - Published on Amazon.com
This is a great book that I highly recommend to anyone interested in ancient history and the Bible. Stiebing tries to give a balanced look at all the possible time periods for the Exodus, and presents archaeological finds from a very wide area. Arguments for and against the Bible are well presented and easy to understand.
Several helpful tables are included where the evidence is visually summarized. Readers can even draw their own conclusions of the evidence and check off each item that matches or does not match the Bible.
The only weakness in Stiebing's book appears when he covers the possibility of a 15th century BCE Exodus. Rather than have most of the arguments and evidence in one chapter or area, they appear in different sections throughout his book. This makes it difficult for the reader to decide whether the Exodus was possible during this period.
While Stiebing is of the opinion that there was no Exodus, a careful study of the archaeology he presents shows otherwise...
6 of 7 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The Exodus' "Archaeological Problems" 29 Jun 2006
By Walter R. Mattfeld - Published on Amazon.com
In my opinion, this is the finest book ever written, covering ALL the archaeological "problems" to be encountered in attempting to _set a date_ for the Exodus/Conquest narratives.

Professor Stiebing notes the archaeological "anomalies" which have arisen for ALL attempts to establish a sitz-im-leben or "archaeologically attested historical context" for the Exodus and Conquest narratives appearing in the Bible. He covers the whole gamut of various proposals by informed amateurs as well as professional scholars from the end of Early Bronze Age to Iron Age I times. He has succinctly summarized his investigations:

"Almost all of the sites mentioned in the biblical Conquest stories were settled in the Iron Age, while many were often not occupied in earlier periods. What might this mean ? Perhaps the biblical accounts say more about when the stories began to take shape than they do about the Conquest itself. There does not seem to be a point in the archaeological sequence in Palestine where the physical evidence revealed by the spade closely matches the biblical Exodus and Conquest narratives. Whether the Exodus and Conquest are placed at the end of Early Bronze III or Middle Bronze II, or in the Iron Age I, there are still serious discrepancies, just as there are with the more common Late Bronze Age placements for these events." (pp.146/148)

The author, despite the failure of archaeology to substantiate the Exodus account (no Israelite encampments ever being found in the Sinai, Negev, Arabah and Transjordan), nevertheless avers that "most likely" there was indeed a movement of peoples (Israel) from Egypt to Canaan, but probably on a much smaller scale than that suggested in the Bible in the 13th century BC (the Ramesside Era). In this era over 600 Iron Age I settlements of stone suddenly appear from nowhere from the Galilee to the Negev and on both sides of the Jordan River.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category