Trade in Yours
For a 1.50 Gift Card
Trade in
Have one to sell? Sell yours here
Sorry, this item is not available in
Image not available for
Image not available

Tell the Publisher!
Id like to read this book on Kindle

Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here, or download a FREE Kindle Reading App.

Oswald and the CIA: The Documented Truth about the Unknown Relationship Between the U.S. Government and the Alleged Killer of JFK [Paperback]

John Newman

Available from these sellers.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Paperback --  
Audio Download, Unabridged 19.60 or Free with 30-day free trial
Trade In this Item for up to 1.50
Trade in Oswald and the CIA: The Documented Truth about the Unknown Relationship Between the U.S. Government and the Alleged Killer of JFK for an gift card of up to 1.50, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more

Product details

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Inside This Book (Learn More)
First Sentence
 Read the first page
Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Search inside this book:

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 4.5 out of 5 stars  33 reviews
65 of 69 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Fine follow up to hardcover edition 29 Mar 2009
By Clement Finn - Published on
Format:Paperback|Verified Purchase
This is a follow up paperback ed. of the original hardcover written some 13 years ago. Despite its provacative title, this was originally not a conspiracy oriented book. Newman's journey into the conspiracy camp has been a slow and deliberative process. The afterword added by the author details his own theory of who was behind the assassination, but he is careful to point out that he could be all wrong. This I find is one of the most refreshing aspects of the book. Newman is a very careful writer as one would expect of a history professor of some note at the University of Maryland. He also served in Vietnam as a major in Army intelligence before becoming Executive assistant to the head of the NSA(National Security Agency). That of course, is a quite impressive resume. He also holds the distinction of being perhaps the only author in the conspiracy camp who once landed an interview with Richard Helms. His research here will be appreciated by all I think. The bulk of the book is not really conspiracy oriented until the final chapter. Newman's background in intelligence serves him well especially in examining and explaining government documents in the case. Plainly his forte is in "document forensics". Even skeptical readers will find themselves wondering why both the CIA and the FBI are planting disinformation about Oswald in the weeks prior to the murder of JFK. They will also wonder why people at both agencies are carefully suppressing information about Oswald prior to Nov.22, 1963. Special attention is paid to the person of Marving Gheesling, who inexplicably removed the "flash" (or "stop" in FBI parlance) from Oswald's file in October of 1963. This single act sealed the doom of JFK as it prevented Oswald's being placed on the security index. Gheesling was severely disciplined by J. Edgar Hoover immediately after the murder of the president, though Hoover never informed the Warren Commission. Hoover well understood the import of Gheesling's actions and would do anything to prevent embarassment of the FBI. The entire incident (and others) was buried in FBI files and Gheesling never faced any questioning from any of the official inquiries into the president's death. Newman's work will stand as a beacon to other academic historians who will now have to re-examine this complicated case and also question the official story.
Newman makes a persuasive case that only one man at CIA had access to all the information needed to manage a sophisticated plot and that was ????. Well, read the book!
21 of 22 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The documents speak for themselves 15 July 1997
By A Customer - Published on
As a intern for Dr. Newman on this particular book, I spent countless hours searching for documents in the National Archives - I know first hand the length he went to provide accurate details. Dr. Newman recounts the interesting story of a dark point in our nation's history. He is very careful not to speculate on the assassination of Kennedy - he deals only with the facts before him - CIA and FBI documents that display what they knew about Oswald. He leaves the rest to the 'assassination buffs'
15 of 16 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Oswald and CIA: was there a connection? Author thinks so. 12 May 1996
By A Customer - Published on
This is an important book in the Kennedy assassination genre. It contains the text of CIA documents not previouslypublished, attempting to establish a CIA connection withLee Harvey Oswald and subsequent efforts on the part of the CIA to conceal this connection through tampering with itsOswald files. The book is flawed by poor editing, andfrom time to time the author makes great leaps in his logic,but for all that, it is well worth the time spent reading.The book breaks off after Oswald's death. One can onlyhope that Mr. Newman writes another volume addressing post-assassination events, including the controversy surroundingthe bona fides of KGB defector Yuriy Nosenko and his claimto have been the KGB officer supervising the Oswald file inRussia
40 of 49 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Oswald Finger Prints of Intelligence!! 22 July 2008
By Armand Herpe - Published on
This Book Oswald and The CIA is The Documented evidence That Oswald was an American Intelligence operative who was a Radar operator in the CIA Top Secret Base in Atsugi Japan,was Trained in the Russian Language by ONI and sent to Russia as a Phony Defector!!This is who LHO was,and this is my firm conviction about him.of course the Govt has been in the Business of disinformation and obfuscation of the truth regarding his connections to Intelligence agencies and his Place in history.Excellent Book!!!!!!
12 of 13 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars The CIA's non-Existent Oswald file? 28 Nov 2012
By Herbert L Calhoun - Published on
In the midst of CIA and Warren Commission denials, this is an important fact-based book. I put it up in the same class as Seth Kantor's book about Jack Ruby, perhaps even a bit higher. Mr. Newman, no stranger to the intelligence game, uses his considerable experience to move a few headstones, where skeletons are buried, around the courtyard at Langley, headstones that a normal reporter or writer might be unable to lift and move at all. What he discovers constitutes the content of this book.

As he goes methodically about the task of composing his narrative, he neither hedges nor anticipates where the facts might lead. He simply lays them out in great detail exactly as he finds them. Needless to say, in the JFK assassination literature, careful fact-finding without heavy-handed interpretation is a sorely needed literary and research attribute. That alone makes this book an academic if not a literary success.

The CIA denials as they ascended the organizational ladder at Langley, started out badly enough and then just continued getting worse -- curiouser and curiouser. When Oswald supposedly defected in 1959, unlike the FBI, which kept a running file on him that it updated as needed, the CIA on the other hand, feigned no interest in him at all? They said the only file they had on this marine who had worked on the highly secret U2 Spy Plane radar system at Atsugi Airfield in Japan, was composed of news clippings of his defection?

Even the cables from Ambassador Richard Snyder at Moscow Station attesting to Oswald's alleged defection and his vow to release U2 secrets, somehow, we are led to believe, did not reach the threshold to trigger CIA interest in him? In fact, as late as February 1964, well after the JFK assassination, the CIA insisted that these important cables from Moscow had somehow gotten lost. And even after having found them, it claimed not to have known who at the CIA might have received and handled them? Given such sloppiness, one cannot avoid wondering what might have happened had Oswald been a "real" rather than a "fake" defector? Not only this, but the CIA's feigned disinterest in Oswald looked utterly ridiculous and wholly disingenuous in the aftermath of a virtual treasure trove of documents on him that eventually emerged from the FOIA searches within the CIA itself, searches that were put to good use here as the primary resource for Newman's analysis.

This work reveals that the author has uncovered a virtual "smoking gun" of highly compartmentalized, multi-level and multi departmental information on Oswald. Perhaps the most important of all is Oswald's role in Mexico and the CIA's direct involvement in manipulating him and his double while he was there. Some have referred to this as the "Rosetta Stone" of the JFK assassination itself.

These data resoundingly refute all CIA denials, and serve to prove that interest in him was not only extensive, and at a very high level indeed, so high in fact that it went directly up the command chain to the very top of the CIA's organizational chart. Combine this with the fact that there was also an equal trail of circumstantial evidence that showed Oswald to actually be on the CIA's payroll, and the denials from the agency's top brass, raise a great many more grave questions than they answer. Here John Newman has succeeded in answering virtually all of them.

That the CIA hierarchy blatantly lied about their own files on Oswald is curious enough in itself, but even more curious is the fact that they did so at a time when the alternative to not knowing about Oswald's defection amounted to revealing the CIA itself as being completely incompetent? Thus when everything is taken together -- the denials of "higher-ups," coupled with the contravening facts to the contrary -- the FOIA data, betray a much larger deeper CIA interest in Oswald, one that was so important and so secret as to require them lying about it? Such "required lying" of course begs the following question: What indeed was so important about Oswald that it required blanket denials from someone as high up the CIA's organizational chart as the Director of Plans, Richard Helms, the agency's highest operational spy? Helms later would become CIA director, where he would then actually be forced into retirement and then ignominiously convicted of perjury.

The correct answer to the question of course is the one the author uncovers; it is also the most obvious one: Oswald's defection was little more than a spy vs spy ruse, one designed to "sheep dip" Lee in operational intelligence as a "dangle" to Soviet intelligence. However, since the Russians did not bite, the CIA's attempt to make Oswald a double agent, failed, and his return to the U.S. empty-handed (but with a Russian wife in tow), turned out to be just another of many failed CIA intelligence operations. That failure in itself could have been enough of a pretext for the Agency to lie about it. However, the way Oswald was moved about on the pre-assassination chessboard (to Mexico, etc.), after his return from Russia, reveals determined manipulators controlling him with a much more sinister purpose in mind. Here Newman tells us what that purpose was; and that only Langley had tentacles long and strong enough to manipulate the man who would become the JFK assassination patsy. This is a most important read. Five Stars
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category