Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See this image

Opticks CD-ROM – May 1998

See all 9 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£19.87 £29.10
--This text refers to the Paperback edition.
Available from these sellers.

Product details

  • CD-ROM: 360 pages
  • Publisher: Octavo; Cdr Blg edition (May 1998)
  • Language: English, Latin
  • ISBN-10: 1891788043
  • ISBN-13: 978-1891788048
  • Product Dimensions: 1.3 x 14.6 x 12.7 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (1 customer review)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 8,295,400 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

5.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See the customer review
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful By Bob on 17 Nov. 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
What can you say.

It is the book written by the scientific giant.

It is hard going in places because of the way that he wrote at the time.

Worth reading carefully. Many of the stories about Newton's discoveries in Optiks are not as usually stated. For example, it was well known that white light passing through a prism would create spectrum, he explained it, having purchased a selection of prisms from the market.
Everyone know that there are seven colours in the spectrum - except that anyone creating one using a prism will see that there are not. Newton did not get it wrong - we have got sloppy - Violet for example is not a specrral colour.

It is astonsihing to compare what Newton actually did (real genius) and decribed with what we have misrepresented.

Buy it and get Newton's own words...
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)

Amazon.com: 21 reviews
11 of 12 people found the following review helpful
One of the all-time great works of science 28 Mar. 2011
By Jake Le Master - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
As this review will appear on multiple editions of Opticks, please select carefully which you purchase. The present edition of this classic work in the history of science is a printing of an edition which was published in 1931 by Messrs G. Bell and Sons of London with a foreword by Albert Einstein and an introduction by E.T. Whittaker. To this wealth of previous introductory material the present edition adds an illuminating preface by I. Bernard Cohen. In an original contribution to the history of science he sets forth the influence that Newton's Opticks, or a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections and colours of light, exerted on other sciences during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. For physical theory Newton's Opticks presented a corpuscular theory of light which dominated physical thought during the eighteenth century. But Cohen shows that Thomas Young, who performed basic experiments for the wave theory of light, held that his views merely developed those of Newton, whose work Young cited extensively. Cohen also refers to the researches of Marjorie Hope Nicolson, to whom the present edition is dedicated in recognition of her revelation of the influence of the Opticks on the literary imagination in the eighteenth century.

The Opticks is divided into the First Book, parts I and II; the Second Book, parts I, II, III, IV; the Third Book, part I. Newton began part I of the First Book with the statement that his design was not to explain the properties of light by hypotheses, but to propose and prove them by reason and experiments. The First Book contains Newton's theory of colors and describes in detail how he varied conditions in order to demonstrate that white light is composed of invariable components. The Second Book describes observations concerning the reflections, refractions and colors of thin transparent bodies. For the description of phenomena of colors of thin films, Newton introduced the concept of "Fits of easy Reflection" for the return of the disposition of any ray of light to be reflected, and also introduced the concept of "Fits of easy Transmission" for the return of its disposition to be transmitted. The interval of its "Fits" is related to the wave length of subsequent wave theory by which the phenomena observed by Newton can be explained readily in terms of interference. The Third Book reports observations concerning the inflections of rays of light, and the colors made thereby. Since Newton did not observe that light is bent into the shadow of a straight edge, a wave phenomenon which is difficult to observe on account of the short wave length of light, he stated his adherence to a corpuscular theory of light. From the phenomenon of double refraction, Newton inferred that the rays of light have sides. The corpuscular theory of light conformed to the general physical theory of atomism which Newton set forth as follows: "It seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form'd Matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable particles..." "That Nature may be lasting, the Changes of corporeal Things are to be placed only in various Separations and new Associations and Motions of these permanent Particles." (p. 400)

Newton's work on optics is of permanent value for its description of original experiments by which new phenomena were discovered, on account of the fundamental nature of the phenomena and also because the experiments admirably illustrate the experimental method of control and variation of conditions of a phenomenon. 20th-Century interest in the Opticks was stimulated by Newton's supplementation of the corpuscular theory by the idea of vibrations in a medium. Newton conjectured that when the rays of light strike a solid body the ether is set in vibration. This combination of corpuscular and wave theory, however, cannot be claimed to have anticipated the dualism of corpuscle and wave aspects of matter and radiation which characterizes quantum theory.

Newton outlined his method of procedure in the next to the last paragraph of the third book of the Opticks: "As in Mathematicks, so in Natural Philosophy, the investigation of difficult things by the Method of Analysis, ought ever to precede the Method of Composition. This Analysis consists in making Experiments and Observations, and in drawing general Conclusions from them by Induction, and admitting of no Objection against the Conclusions, but such as are taken from Experiments, or other certain Truths. For Hypotheses are not to be regarded in experimental philosophy." In the terminology of contemporary theory, Newton sought operational definitions of physical concepts. He rejected the occult qualities of the Aristotelians as "Qualities unknown to us and uncapable of being discovered and made manifest." (p. 401)

It may be argued that in the Opticks Newton reserved his hypotheses for the Queries. To this one may reply that he expressly stated that the Queries concerned problems of the properties of light on which he did not have time to make further observations and studies. To quote: "And since I have not finished this part of my Design, I shall conclude with proposing only some Queries, in order to a farther search to be made by others." (p. 338) In the very last paragraph of the Opticks Newton stated that in the first two books he proceeded by Analysis. "In this Third Book," he added, "I have only begun the Analysis of what remains to be discovered about Light and its Effects upon the Frame of Nature, hinting several things about it and leaving the Hints to be examined and improved by the further Experiments and Observations of such as are inquisitive."

Newton declared that the business of natural philosophy is to argue from phenomena without feigning hypotheses, and to deduce causes from effects, till we come to the very first cause, which certainly is not mechanical. (p. 369) In this procedure of finding causes he used his constructive imagination in the Principia as well as in the Opticks.

In an appreciative foreword, Albert Einstein declares that in one person Newton combined the experimenter, the theorist, the mechanic and, not least, the artist in exposition. I heartily subscribes to the further statement of the foreword: "this new edition of his work on optics is...to be welcomed with warmest thanks, because it alone can afford us the enjoyment of a look at the personal activity of this unique man."
7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
Brilliant 9 Feb. 2009
By Viktor Blasjo - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
There are two main arguments for a corpuscular view of light:

(1) Light consists of rays of inherent and inalterable dispositions (as regards colour, refrangibility, etc.). This is argued for throughout, but see esp. the classic prism experiments in props. I and II. Wave theorists, on the contrary, base their explanations on modifications of rays.

(2) The law of refraction "may be demonstrated upon this Supposition. That Bodies refract Light by acting upon its Rays in Lines perpendicular to their Surfaces" (p. 79). Consider what happens as the ray passes through the strip from y=c to the surface boundary at y=0. Newton states the lemma that the vertical velocity v_2 at y=0 will be determined by the initial vertical velocity v_1 at y=c and the would-be vertical velocity v_0 at y=0 if v_1 had been 0, as follows: v_2^2=v_1^2+v_0^2. Newton omits the proof as being too easy; it may be supplied as follows. Think of the v's as functions of y and differentiate. Both sides vill be of the form 2v(dv/dy) = 2(dy/dt)(dv/dy) = 2(dv/dt) = 2a = proportional to F, which is equal at equal y's. Thus since the lemma holds for c=0 and the derivatives are equal it holds generally. Though Newton emphasises that he has not assumed anything about the nature of light, we see that this proof makes most sense from a corpuscular point of view since it in effect appeals to F=ma. A further side effect of this proof is that it implies that light speeds up when it is refracted towards the normal, which implies that light is slowest in vacuum and fastest in dense materials.

(1) and (2) are elegantly combined if rays of different colours consist of particles of different sizes.

Further arguments against the wave theory (Query 28): light does not "bend into the Shadow"; it cannot explain "the unusual Refraction of Island Crystal"; it needs two aethers to explain the "fits" in the next paragraph; "against filling the Heavens with fluid Mediums, unless they be exceedingly rare, a great Objection arises from the regular and very lasting Motions of the Planets ... for thence it is manifest, that the Heavens are void of all sensible Resistance."

Nevertheless, waves are needed to explain interference patterns and the fact that light is in alternating "fits of easy Reflexion and easy Transmission" (p. 281). This can be done as follows (Query 18). When light goes from one medium to another it strikes the aether, creating waves like ripples on a pond. These ripples travel faster than the rays and "by endeavouring to expand itself" (p. 352) the aether is thus alternately pushing and pulling on the rays, causing the fits. The existence on the aether is suggested by the fact that thermometers behave the same in vacuum as in air (Query 18). Since light and heat are capable of generating each other (Queries 8-10), it is plausible that this aether is the same as that of light.

The other major theme in the book is colour theory. This is all very good, but it is not very exciting since these ideas are so commonplace today. An interesting exception is Query 14 where it is suggested that harmonious colour combinations are due to harmonious combinations of frequencies, as in music.
By Steven H Propp - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback
Sir Isaac Newton (1643-1727) was an English physicist, mathematician, whose Principia (published in 1687) founded classical mechanics, and described universal gravitation and the three laws of motion. His most famous work is The Principia.

He begins this 1704 book by stating, "My design in this Book is not to explain the Properties of Light by Hypotheses, but to propose and prove them by Reason and Experiments: In order to which I shall premise the following Definitions and Axioms." (Pg. 1)

After an experiment with prisms, he observes, "we find... that when the Rays which differ in Refrangibility are separated from one another, and any one Sort of them is considered apart, the Colour of the Light which they compose cannot be changed by any Refraction or Reflexion whatever, as it ought to be were Colours nothing else than Modifications of Light caused by Refractions, and Reflexions, and Shadows. This Unchangeableness of Colour I am now to describe…” (Pg. 121)

He observes, “all the Productions and Appearances of Colours in the World are derived, not from any physical Change caused in Light by Refraction or Reflexion, but only from the various Mixtures or Separations of rays, by virtue of their different Refrangibility or Reflexibility. And in this respect the Science of Colours becomes a Speculation as truly mathematical as any other part of Opticks. I mean, so far as they depend on the Nature of Light, and are not produced or altered by the Power of Imagination, or by striking or pressing the Eye.” (Pg. 244)

He points out, “Now the smallest Particles of Matter may cohere by the strongest Attractions, and compose bigger Particles of weaker Virtue; and many of these may cohere and compose bigger Particles whose virtue is still weaker, and so on for divers Successions, until the Progression end in the biggest Particles on which the Operations in Chymistry, and the Colours of natural Bodies depend, and which by cohering compose bodies of a sensible Magnitude.” (Pg. 394)

He concludes, “Now by the help of these Principles, all material Things seem to have been composed of the hard and solid Particles above-mentioned, variously associated in the first Creation by the Counsel of an intelligent Agent. For it became him who created them to set them in order. And if he did so, it’s unphilosophical to seek for any other Origin of the World, or to pretend that it might arise out of a Chaos by the mere Laws of Nature; though being once formed, it may continue by those Laws for many Ages. For while Comets move in very excentrick Orbs in all manner of Positions, blind Fate could never make all the Planets move one and the same way in Orbs excentrick, some inconsiderable Irregularities excepted, which may have arisen from mutual Actions of Comets and Planets upon one another, and which will be apt to increase, till this System wants a Reformation. Such a wonderful Uniformity in the Planetary System must be allowed the Effect of Choice.” (Pg. 402)

This book will be of keen interest to students of the history of science.
Classic 3 Nov. 2014
By Molocrom - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase
A classic. If you already know some physics, it is an enjoyable historic document. Be surprised at the creativity of one of the makers of modern physics.
Three Stars 21 Jan. 2015
By Natasha Redding - Published on Amazon.com
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
Great topic. Not so great a publication but, good enough to keep for the information's sake.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know