One reason I get books on collections of photographs is, I think, to try and make sense of the medium. It can be an unruly beast, ranging in scope from the amateur snapshot, through reportage and social documentary, on past fashion and advertising, all the way to high art. Without attempting to be comprehensive in any way, this collection touches on a number of these areas and creates an idiosyncratic overview of our little hobby.
Altough limited by time, money and availability Bruce Bernard obviously had a good eye for a photograph and, being a Sunday Times picture editor, had a penchant for the social documentary image. He was also very aware of how the person in the street reacts to, and uses, photographic images and it is possible to see this factor in a number of the selections.
The range covers most of the history of the medium and a wide range of practitioners, though perhaps too many representatives of the 'vernacular' wing (that is the amateur to you and me), and their close cousin, Anon. The first four photographs in the book perhaps give a reasonable view of how things go:
1) Picture of a Navajo Indian from 1904 by Edward S Curtis
2) Mohammed Ali from 1974 by David King
3) Couple of friends in a pub from 1983 by Graham Smith
4) A gently pornographic sequence of a woman undressing from 1940, by good old Anon.
I enjoyed the contributions from Mark Haworth-Booth (Curator of the V&A), they definitely added a further dimension to the collection.
So why not five stars? There is no real theme to the collection that I could discern and I found that a bit frustrating. Each picture stood on its own and, while I can appreciate why that is done, I was left wanting some organisational principle. Also there is no index to the photographs, which is really frustrating if you want to find a particular example again. Why four stars? The photographs do repay spending time with them, they are well chosen and a number of them stand out as images of the highest quality.
You may end up knowing more about Bruce Bernard than having a comprehensive grasp of the history of photography, that was the intention of the book, but I found it worth investing the time. It is a book you can revisit.