One Billion Hungry: Can We Feed the World? and over 2 million other books are available for Amazon Kindle . Learn more
FREE Delivery in the UK.
Only 5 left in stock (more on the way).
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.
Gift-wrap available.
One Billion Hungry: Can W... has been added to your Basket
+ £2.80 UK delivery
Used: Very Good | Details
Sold by fatbrainbooks
Condition: Used: Very Good
Comment: Dispatch Same Working Day, (Delivery 2-4 business days, Courier For Heavy/Expensive Items) Money Back Guarantee, 99.3% Customer Satisfaction, Prompt Customer Service.
Trade in your item
Get a £0.99
Gift Card.
Have one to sell?
Flip to back Flip to front
Listen Playing... Paused   You're listening to a sample of the Audible audio edition.
Learn more
See all 2 images

One Billion Hungry: Can We Feed the World? Paperback – 20 Sep 2012

2 customer reviews

See all 3 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions
Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition
"Please retry"
"Please retry"
£10.31 £9.00
£18.95 FREE Delivery in the UK. Only 5 left in stock (more on the way). Dispatched from and sold by Amazon. Gift-wrap available.

Special Offers and Product Promotions

  • Win a £5,000 Gift Card for your child's school by voting for their favourite book. Learn more.
  • Prepare for the summer with our pick of the best selection for children (ages 0 - 12) across

Win a £5,000 Gift Card and 30 Kindle E-readers for your child or pupil's school.
Vote for your child or pupil(s) favourite book(s) here to be in with a chance to win.

Product details

  • Paperback: 456 pages
  • Publisher: Comstock Publishing Associates (20 Sept. 2012)
  • Language: English
  • ISBN-10: 0801478022
  • ISBN-13: 978-0801478024
  • Product Dimensions: 22.6 x 15.2 x 2.8 cm
  • Average Customer Review: 4.0 out of 5 stars  See all reviews (2 customer reviews)
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 607,721 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

Product Description

One Billion Hungry In this book, one of the world's foremost experts on global food needs explains the many interrelated issues critical to our global food supply from the science of agricultural advances to the politics of food security. Full description

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
See both customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

Format: Paperback
(review by Gilbert Etienne for Tiers Monde,leading French journal on development)

Gordon Conway has played an important role in the fight against extreme poverty and hunger in the world. He was closely involved with USAID, President of the Rockefeller Foundation, and is now a professor at Imperial College London.
The author is equally at home in a remote corner of Hunza (Pakistan highlands)as in the rice fields of India or the eroded lands of sub Saharan Africa. The foresight of the practitioner combines with the negotiator and develops ideas. In his time, Gordon Conway participated in the Green Revolution (GR) in Asia.

This book highlights the benefits of GR, including for the poorest, the landless and very smallholder farmers contrary to generally accepted ideas. However, despite the rise of modern inputs, over several years crop yields have tended to plateau.
Several remedies are needed: reduced chemical fertilizers in favour of organic fertilizers, reduced and better use of pesticides, and better water management, knowing that irrigation is almost indispensable. In these conditions, those regions that depend only on rainfall, which can be little or irregular, do not lend themselves to GR. This is worth a couple of chapters alone about soils in Africa and Asia.

We must note the author's comments on local traditions of sub Saharan Africa and Asia. He places particular emphasis on supporting smallholder farmers owning about 1 ha of land.

This book discusses technical analysis techniques as well as it discusses development strategies, especially in sub Saharan Africa and South Asia, the most exposed areas to extreme poverty and malnutrition.
Read more ›
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
2 of 4 people found the following review helpful By Nicholas on 12 Feb. 2013
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
I was a bit disappointed by this book. It reads largely like a reference work: a long series of definitions and explanation of terms, with not much insight or analysis. Perhaps okay for flipping through, but as an overview of the area it lacks much broader discussion of the possible answers to its question, rather than just defining concepts that may or may not be of relevance.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback. If this review is inappropriate, please let us know.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again

Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 12 reviews
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
Can we feed the Green Revolution? 17 Oct. 2013
By Eric Holt-Gimenez - Published on
Format: Paperback
Sir Gordon Conway's One Billion Hungry: Can We Feed the World? is the authoritative text for the 21st Century iteration of what Raj Patel (2013) calls the "Long Green Revolution." In it, Dr. Conway outlines an approach for ending hunger and poverty by reaching out to the world's hungriest people--peasant farmers.

One Billion Hungry is an expanded update of Conway's earlier work, The doubly Green Revolution (Conway1997). During the 15 year hiatus between books, an explosive combination of global warming, peak oil, water scarcity, agrofuels, grain-fed meat, land grabbing and financial speculation has ushered in a new era of high, volatile food prices and widespread peasant dispossession and impoverishment. Notwithstanding record global harvests following an average annual rise in food per capita of 12% over the last twenty years, in 2008 and 2011 over 1 billion people went hungry, triggering food riots and full-scale rebellions. The resulting human suffering and political instability have called the legitimacy of the global food system--and the Green Revolution--seriously into question.

One Billion Hungry attempts to re-establish the imperative of the Green Revolution under conditions of global markets, monopoly concentration and the privatization of pretty much everything--including the hallmark public research of the original Green Revolution. Conway laments these developments, but ultimately accepts the liberalization of food systems and avoids questioning heroic assumptions of endless global economic growth. This steers One Billion Hungry to the standard Green Revolution proposal: to feed 9 billion people, we must double food production by 2050.

For Dr. Conway, the routes to world food security are: technological innovation, fair and efficient markets, "people," and political leadership. He's right, but just how these routes are traveled is where followers and critics will part ways. Situated at the nexus of productivity, resilience, equity and stability, Conway asserts that "sustainable intensification" will end world hunger by using less land, less water and fewer chemicals--along with more biotechnology and more free markets. The bulk of the 439-page tome is a dry, not entirely uncritical, reaffirmation of high-yielding varieties and biotechnology, as well as many profiles of what most agroecologists would consider good agricultural practices (Sustainable Rice Intensification, Integrated Pest Management, soil & water conservation, intercropping, etc.). Conway claims that because the problem of global hunger is so great, we will need all solutions--as well as enabling conditions--to raise the incomes of the world's 2.5 billion smallholders and feed the world.

Dr. Conway is spot-on about the need for enabling conditions, but he skips lightly over the structural determinants inherent in today's corporate food regime and underplays their regressive impact. He invites us to believe that despite the overwhelming financial power of neoliberal markets and chemical-based plantation agriculture, a doubly Green Revolution will somehow provide complimentary opportunities for agroecology and peasant farmers, bringing an end to hunger without changing the agrarian status quo.

Gordon Conway clearly cares very deeply for the struggling farmers of the world. He knows that the Green Revolution's packages are ineffective on the fragile lands to which smallholders--who feed over half the world--have been marginalized. Without sound agroecological management, Green Revolution inputs are not sustainable; they degrade agroecosystems and destroy livelihoods. (Given the increase in severe weather events, without extensive agrarian reform, nothing will save smallholders on extremely fragile lands... though Conway does not consider land distribution an "enabling condition.")
In the wake of the Green Revolution's widespread failures, successful, peasant-driven agroecological practices have raised yields and increased resiliency for millions of farmers worldwide. Incorporating agroecology into the Green Revolution is a good idea for someone who is trying to re-green it. But do peasant farmers using agroecological practices need another Green Revolution? Or is it the Green Revolution that needs them? What conditions and mechanisms would specifically enable development of agroecological peasant agriculture? One Billion Hungry fails to reflect on these critical questions.

Despite Dr. Conway's path-breaking work in IPM and ecological resilience, he provides little agroecological analysis. The "Farmers as Innovators" chapter is largely limited to the experiences with which he is personally familiar. References to the vast literature chronicling forty years of agroecological research are sparse, outdated, and do not recognize the development of a science that has expanded from the field to the food system (Gliessman 2013; Sevilla Guzmán and Woodgate 2013). There is no mention of the remarkable agroecological successes in food security and national-scale resiliency in Cuba (Rosset, Sosa and D. Lozano 2011; Chan and Freyre Roach 2012), or of how social movements have effectively spread sustainable practices across Central America (Holt-Giménez 2006), East Africa (Wilson 2011) and Brazil (Petersen, Mussoi and Dal Soglio 2013). These are the tip of the iceberg for agroecological transformation and cannot be ignored, precisely because they soundly contradict the Green Revolution paradigm.

The intrinsic weakness of One Billion Hungry is its lack of a frame for understanding the agrarian transitions of capitalist agriculture. The rise of the agrifood monopolies and global markets driving the differentiation and dispossession of the peasantry take place on the margins of Conway's explanations, even though he knows that the farmers he must reach are losing their seeds, soil, land and livelihoods as a result of the expansion of the large-scale, capitalist agriculture the Green Revolution "enables." Dr. Conway insists that with a doubly Green Revolution, things will be different. This time the monopolization of agriculture's genetic resources will lead to more, not less agrobiodiversity; global markets will enrich, not impoverish peasants; agroecological methods and landraces will be supported on par with the support given to chemicals and GMOs; research funding will be equitably directed to soil building, conservation and non-proprietary materials... The book's conclusion consists of a 24-point to-do list that elides the conflicts that exist between these recommendations.

The arc of Dr. Conway's experience has drawn him into the technocratic vortex of the Green Revolution's episteme in which conventional assumptions regarding agriculture and society are accepted as fact. One Billion Hungry's chapter on "Political Economy" avoids asking `who owns what? who does what? who gets what? what do they do with it?' (Bernstein 2010, 22). The "theory of change" is an analytical tautology affirming a "highly productive, stable, resilient, equitable and sustainable" Green Revolution in order to have another Green Revolution. The implicit hypothesis: that only a doubly Green Revolution will save the world from hunger, is never seriously tested. Conway's lack of systemic analysis lead us back, lemming-like, to the predictable conclusion: Despite the egregious failures of the Green Revolution, to end hunger, we need another one.

One Billion Hungry signals important shifts in global, capitalist agriculture. Introduced by the Rockefeller Foundation and led by Norman Borlaug, the original Green Revolution was driven by crop breeding and petroleum. Research centers were publicly financed and high-yielding varieties were public goods. The World Bank's downsizing and restructuring of the Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research in 1996 opened the Green Revolution to private financing and modern genetic engineering. That the Gates Foundation replaced Rockefeller as philanthropic flagship reflects the ascendance of proprietary technologies. Ironically, Conway, an agricultural ecologist, has succeeded Borlaug, the crop scientist, as the new champion for the triad of genetic engineering, sustainable intensification and free markets.

The Green Revolution is entering its seventh decade. By the time global population levels off in 2050 the promise to end world hunger by dint of a continuous flow of new crop varieties and external inputs will span a century. One Billion Hungry is not a revolutionary call, but a plea for kinder, gentler industrial agriculture during a period of late agrarian capitalism in which smallholders and the planet's natural resources are being systematically ravaged by global monopolies.

Gordon Conway wants to feed the world while satiating the global appetite of the beast in whose belly he sits. Outside the Green Revolution, many are clamoring for its passing, and for a farmer-led, agroecological revolution.

By Eric Holt-Giménez, Ph.D., Executive Director
Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy
Works cited:
Bernstein, H. 2010. Class dynamics of agrarian change. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing; Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.

Chan, M.L., E.F. Freyre Roach. 2012. Unfinished Puzzle: Cuban Agriculture: the Challenges Lessons and Opportunities. Food First Books. Oakland, CA.

Conway, G. 1997. The doubly Green Revolution: Food for all in the 21st Century. Oxford, UK. Penguin Books.

Gliessman, S. 2013. Agroecology: Growing the Roots of Resistance. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 37 (1):19-31.

Holt-Giménez, E. 2006. Campesino a Campesino: Voices from Latin America's Farmer to Farmer Movement. Oakland, CA. Food First.

Patel, R. 2013.The Long Green Revolution. Journal of Peasant Studies. Vol. 40, No. 1, 1-63,
Petersen, P., E.M. Mussoi, E. Dal Soglio. Institutionalization of the Agroecological Approach in Brazil: Advances and Challenges. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 37 (1):103-144.

Rosset, P., B. Sosa, A. Jaime, and D. Lozano. 2011. The Campesino-to-Campesino Agroecology Movement of ANAP in Cuba: Social process methodology in the construction of sustainable peasant agriculture and food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38: 29-30.

Sevilla Guzmán, E., and G. Woodgate. 2013. Agroecology: Foundations in Agrarian Social Thought and Sociological Theory. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. 37 (1):32-44.

Wilson, J. 2011. Irrepressibly Towards Food Sovereignty. In: Food Movements Unite! Strategies to transform our food systems. ed. E. Holt-Giménez. 71-92. Oakland, CA, Food First Books.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful
A Superb Overview 24 Jan. 2013
By Charles Weiss - Published on
Format: Paperback
This is the bible, not just on hunger, but on all aspects of sustainable international agriculture as it affects developing countries,. It is full of up to date information and sound insights born of Prof. Conway's enormous experience. The standard text on the subject, worth reading cover to cover. I will be using it in my courses.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Excellent Book 6 Dec. 2012
By Amazon Customer - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
This book should be mandatory in the school, our ability to provide the food people need to survive, will be tested in the coming years. Gordon Conway establish a compelling and articulated exposition of the different road we can take to prevent this disaster.
Brilliant but Too Broad 21 Dec. 2013
By Emma Button - Published on
Format: Paperback Verified Purchase
In his book, Gordon Conway writes of pathways to start a Doubly Green Revolution to complete what was lacking in the Green Revolution (namely, increasing food production to eradicate hunger and decrease the environmental impacts). All of his suggestions are extremely valid and exciting - especially because of his passion to see food production increase while reducing environmental impacts. He did a fair job of evaluating the benefits of fertilizer use and irrigation in light of their potential destructive effects on the environment. However, the book fell short because of its breadth. With such a broad message, Conway was disabled from ever being able to provide satisfactory solutions. The best he could offer were conceptual, vague solutions that sound good on paper but leave much to be desired in terms of practical application. This book could have be much more exciting and engaging to read if it had connected the author's broad ideals (i.e. conservation tilling) with practical applications (i.e. how did this work in a specific region? What were challenges? Successes?). All in all, I thought Conway tried to pack too much information in his book and the result was a collection of vague, fuzzy goals that the reader is doubtful will ever actually be accomplished.
this is not an easy job as utter politically motivated nonsense gets in the ... 25 Oct. 2014
By Jeff B - Published on
Format: Paperback
This was a perfectly reasonable attempt to explain to political theorists some of the realities on the ground in feeding the world. As some of the other reviews suggest, this is not an easy job as utter politically motivated nonsense gets in the way of a realistic examination of history - "we" find a way through education and technological improvement that overcomes thousands of years of superstition and horrendous government policy. This book is a start.
Were these reviews helpful? Let us know