Right, so this is an extremely challenging collection, Heidegger's examination of language is definitely key to his overall way of thinking, which is probably why it's so hard to get at, for a lot of these he seems more interested in pointing the way towards a meaningful inquiry than actually trying to engage and wrestle with one. And while some of these seemed sort of non-comittal, they certainly have no lack of things to say about the phenomenon itself, and a lot of what they do say seems to tie back into itself in a sort of philosophic feedback loop. If that sounds vague, it's because largely I couldn't get my mind around what he was trying to do in these essays. I felt a lot less confident about what he's trying to pursue here than I do about the stuff in 'Poetry, Language, Thought.' Even taking them at just 5-10 pages a day, I think I'll need to go through these again some time later on before I can get a definite sense of them.