Product details
Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
|
The film's story remains faithful to the book, which tells the life of Little Nell and her grandfather, who left their house because of the threat of Quilp, moneylender. They seek for the place to live, and meets variety of unique Dickensian characaters. In the meanwhile, Quilp, having grudge against Kit, a boy who once was working for Nell's grandfather, tries to imprison him with a help from a toady lawyer Mr. Sampson Brass and his sister Sally the "Dragon Lady."
As I said, many would be amazed (or amused) to see the film's old-fashioned way of making, but this has a reason. Clearly the producers rely on our knowledge of Dickens and his works -- in other words, we are supposed to have read the book. The proof is that many episodes of the original book are preserved as they were, as if taken directly from the book published 100 years before. The half-diapidated counting house of Quilp, with Tom Scott always doing some mischief, is re-created exactly as it was in the famous illustration by Phiz, and so are the entertainers at the fair including not only Codlin and Short, but also Jerry's dogs. You will see the man and woman walking on stilts on the road, as you have seen them in the original illustration. That faithfulness is the thing that always surprises (and entertains) us.
Those who haven't read the book would probably find the film's production too old; the fact is, old-fashioned as it is, the film is only an attempt to capture the book's atomosphere. That is also the reason of Quilp's ridiculously exaggerated acting, which he really does in the book. Quilp hops, dances, grinds his teeth, and scares his wife Mrs. Quilp and her mother to death when his nose is called flat by them (yes, that famous and joyful scene no Dickensians would forget). The film's Quilp overacts, simply because the book's Quilp does so.
Non-Dickensians would think that Peter Ustinov's TV-mini series made in 1995 are better, and they have good reason. But I for one prefer this version (which didn't delete Marchioness), which looks closer to the Dickensian world I come to know through the book. Remember, the original book itself is fairly old-fashioned and theatrical.
|