| ||||||||||||||||||
![]() Trade In this Item for up to £4.35
Get an extra £5 when you trade in books worth £10 or more until June 30, 2012. Trade in Of Grammatology for an Amazon.co.uk gift card of up to £4.35, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Find more products eligible for trade-in.
|
Product details
|
The translation is a noble job, and we should be grateful to have this distinguished book in our hands... [Spivak's] situating of Derrida among his precursors—Nietzsche, Freud, Heidegger, Husserl—and contemporaries—Lacan, Foucault, and the elusive animal known as structuralism—is very lucid and extremely useful.
(Michael Wood New York Review of Books )The tool-kit for anyone who wants to empty the 'presence' out of any text he has taken a dislike to. A handy arsenal of deconstructive tools are to be found in its pages, and the technique, once learnt, is as simple, and as destructive, as leaving a bomb in a brown paper bag outside (or inside) a pub.
(Roger Poole Notes and Queries )There is cause for rejoicing in the translation of De la grammatologie... Just as Derrida discloses in Rousseau a writer who distrusts writing and longs for the proximity of the self to its voice, so Spivak approaches Derrida through the structure of his diction; no ideas but in the words themselves.
(Denis Donoghue New Republic )Reading Derrida was the shock of a decentering, the critical shift into a world of the interminable movement of difference, the crisis of any closure. Of Grammatology was and remains the most tightly worked... and exemplary... demonstration of the science of this shift and crisis.
(Canto )One of the major works in the development of contemporary criticism and philosophy.
(J. Hillis Miller, Yale University )Jacques Derrida's revolutionary theories about deconstruction, phenomenology, psychoanalysis, and structuralism, first voiced in the 1960s, forever changed the face of European and American criticism. The ideas in De la grammatologie sparked lively debates in intellectual circles that included students of literature, philosophy, and the humanities, inspiring these students to ask questions of their disciplines that had previously been considered improper. Thirty years later, the immense influence of Derrida's work is still igniting controversy, thanks in part to Gayatri Spivak's translation, which captures the richness and complexity of the original. This corrected edition adds a new index of the critics and philosophers cited in the text and makes one of contemporary criticism's most indispensable works even more accessible and usable.
Tags Customers Associate with This Product(What's this?)Click on a tag to find related items, discussions, and people.
|
Saussure's linguistic project of identity through difference which so influenced the French social sciences seems failed as Derrida delights us with moments of Saussurean binary opposition caving in itself through . At times I felt presented with almost Godellean moments. How Derrida does it, I do not know- I have tried myself to conflate 'opposites' the way he does without much success.
Be warned that this is heavy going and in my opinion requires (at least)a rudimentary prior knowledge of various thinkers (Heidegger, Freud, Nietzche, Saussure [and the Post-/Structuralist projects generally- especially Lacan and Levi-Strauss]). What helped me through this book was the 'Routledge Critical Thinkers: Jacques Derrida' by Nicholas Royle (London:2003)and the illustrated Introducing Derrida by Jeff Collins and Bill Mayblin (Icon Books, 2000). Referring to the excellent Spivak 'introduction' as a safety-net may also be of some help. Good Luck! (you'll need it).
For those baffled by the ambiguities in the seemingly simple argument of Rousseau's Le Contrat Social, Derrida demonstrates how Rousseau's text eludes his authorship and becames an exemplar of differance - the endlessly promised, but always already mediated and deferred, articulation of word and thing.
Derrida's Marxism - his emphasis upon the materiality of the signifier vis-a-vis the signified- has been only recently acknowledged by the author ( "Spectors of Marx") yet the underlying political sub-text of this book is Liberalism and tolerance: let the reader bring his own ideolect to the text.
This book is as fresh and vibrant as a manifesto: if the 30's had Language, Truth and Logic then Derrida doesn't as much sit on Ayer's shoulders as show that the head on it was taking a rest.
|
This product's forum
Active discussions in related forums
Search Customer Discussions
|
Related forums
|
|
|
|