For historians of Russian history and of this period and with its political and social implications, then "October" remains a must. For those of us who aren't, we the ones who've worked our way backwards from more popular Russian films and of Sergei Eisenstein, in particular, how does it appeal to us?
Silent film can be hard to follow and difficult for us 21st century media moguls to connect with. We're used to seeing Charlie Chaplin and Buster Keaton being sped up, here it is convincingly racing. This breakneck speed is exciting, but is it interesting?
Those of us who know their classic Russian cinema a bit will be aware of their superb, almost geometrically composed compositions and framing - as a photographer myself, I've seen many that really have taken my breath away. And, the techniques of cutting and superimposition and many more that were seen in Dziga Vertov's 'Man With a Movie Camera' made two years after this (1929). After the classic and much more widely seen (and available) 'Battleship Potempkin' from this same director, Eisenstein, we can presume that we'd be getting at least some of those characteristics here.
Well, we do, of course. After a frenetic start on the streets of Leningrad and to the strains of Shostakovich, it does simmer down a bit. As is commonly known, it is all propaganda and these sorts shown in cinemas were like newspapers to a largely illiterate, peasant population.
Downsides, well, the picture quality isn't too clever and doesn't look very restored. The written notices, that were in lovely old and elegant font in D W Griffiths' and many others, are simply standard, boring and modern text on a plain grey background. A small matter, maybe, but they spoil both the continuity and period feel.
Is it worth buying? My copy of 'Battleship Potempkin' was issued by a Sunday newspaper as a 'Freebie' and I rented 'Man With a Movie Camera' from my local lending library as it's a kind of educational classic. I bought "October" DVD quite a lot cheaper than Amazon sell it themselves, so that reduced its sting in that aspect. I don't begrudge spending what I did on it but probably wouldn't have spent more. The film, as films go, is good, but not great and it really helps if you have a vested interest in buying it, as mentioned before.