- Hardcover: 368 pages
- Publisher: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1st edition (1978)
- ISBN-10: 0394428145
- ISBN-13: 978-0710000408
- Product Dimensions: 23.6 x 16 x 4.3 cm
- Average Customer Review: 3.7 out of 5 stars See all reviews (27 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 2,552,766 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know you can trade in your old books for an Amazon.co.uk Gift Card to spend on the things you want? Plus, get an extra £5 Gift Certificate when you trade in books worth £10 or more before June 30, 2012. Visit the Books Trade-In Store for more details. |
Product details |
More About the Author
Product Description
8vo. xiii, 369 pp. Gilt-lettered cloth in pictorial dw. Ex-college library copy with modest markings. Dw rippled. Spine cocked, boards slightly bowed, fore-edge a little soiled. A VG- copy in VG- dw.
Inside This Book
(Learn More)
Browse and search another edition of this book.
Browse and search another edition of this book.
First Sentence
On June 13, 1910, Arthur James Balfour lectured the House of Commons on "the problems with which we have to deal in Egypt." Read the first page Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
On June 13, 1910, Arthur James Balfour lectured the House of Commons on "the problems with which we have to deal in Egypt." Read the first page Browse Sample Pages
Front Cover | Copyright | Table of Contents | Excerpt | Index | Back Cover
Suggested Tags from Similar Products(What's this?)Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)
|
Sell a Digital Version of This Book in the Kindle Store
If you are a publisher or author and hold the digital rights to a book, you can sell a digital version of it in our Kindle Store.
Learn more
What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?
Customer Reviews
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
19 of 19 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback|Amazon Verified Purchase
If you are hesitating between 'Orientalism' and 'Culture and Empire', 'Orientalism' is probably the book to get. It was Saïd's first and original contribution, and it is about culture, his field, more than about history, in which he was not a specialist.
Saïd argues that Orientalism paved the ground for, and was later sustained by, colonialism in that it created fixed categories by which the Orient became known to Europeans. These stereotyped views emphasizing, say, fatalism, superstition, or a lack of a conception of liberty, predisposed Europeans to rule over the peoples they classified as Oriental. Saïd's point is that Orientalism owed more to textual analysis than to actual conditions in the East, enabling Europeans to project their own fantasies, wishes, and prejudices onto Orientals. History and archaeology, for example, interpreting the Orient through its classical cultures (ancient Egypt, Sanskrit, Sufi poetry, etc..), supported perceptions of Orientals as impervious to progress and at the same time of civilisations in decline and therefore in need of regeneration through European power. While some of Saïd's references are obscure, especially of some twentieth-century Orientalists, many draw from mainstream literature (Dante, Flaubert, Lane) or immediately graspable travel, historical, and political works. Most are entertaining and thought-provoking, sometimes hilarious, and Saïd's exegesis is consistently witty and incisive.
Saïd's is no doubt a partial view, and it has been criticized as well as emulated. But the author himself makes no total claim on his sources, many of which he professes to admire. This is a book about culture, not history: it brings to light a certain undercurrent in a body of work and literature, it does not aim to explain colonialism. (Indeed, this is probably why 'Orientalism' is less problematic than 'Culture and Empire': Saïd's work as history faces issues of chronology - Orientalism in art, for example, was in terminal decline when Britain and France began to grab the Middle East in earnest - and it is weaker at connecting representation to agency.) Finally, nor is 'Orientalism' about the evils of colonisation as such, or even the truthfulness of Orientalist writing. It is a decoding of a 200+ year-long academic and artistic tradition, no more or less. Saïd's interest is in studying Orientalism as cultural phenomenon, not an Orient which he argues is, as a category, mythical anyway. But it is best to quote the author: 'One scarcely knows what to make of these caricatural permutations of a book that to its author and in its arguments is explicitly anti-essentialist, radically sceptical about all categorical designations such as Orient and Occident, and painstakingly careful about not "defending" or even discussing the Orient and Islam.' This book is a must for anyone interested in the meaning of cultural difference, and it is an exhilarating, sometimes electrifying read.
Saïd argues that Orientalism paved the ground for, and was later sustained by, colonialism in that it created fixed categories by which the Orient became known to Europeans. These stereotyped views emphasizing, say, fatalism, superstition, or a lack of a conception of liberty, predisposed Europeans to rule over the peoples they classified as Oriental. Saïd's point is that Orientalism owed more to textual analysis than to actual conditions in the East, enabling Europeans to project their own fantasies, wishes, and prejudices onto Orientals. History and archaeology, for example, interpreting the Orient through its classical cultures (ancient Egypt, Sanskrit, Sufi poetry, etc..), supported perceptions of Orientals as impervious to progress and at the same time of civilisations in decline and therefore in need of regeneration through European power. While some of Saïd's references are obscure, especially of some twentieth-century Orientalists, many draw from mainstream literature (Dante, Flaubert, Lane) or immediately graspable travel, historical, and political works. Most are entertaining and thought-provoking, sometimes hilarious, and Saïd's exegesis is consistently witty and incisive.
Saïd's is no doubt a partial view, and it has been criticized as well as emulated. But the author himself makes no total claim on his sources, many of which he professes to admire. This is a book about culture, not history: it brings to light a certain undercurrent in a body of work and literature, it does not aim to explain colonialism. (Indeed, this is probably why 'Orientalism' is less problematic than 'Culture and Empire': Saïd's work as history faces issues of chronology - Orientalism in art, for example, was in terminal decline when Britain and France began to grab the Middle East in earnest - and it is weaker at connecting representation to agency.) Finally, nor is 'Orientalism' about the evils of colonisation as such, or even the truthfulness of Orientalist writing. It is a decoding of a 200+ year-long academic and artistic tradition, no more or less. Saïd's interest is in studying Orientalism as cultural phenomenon, not an Orient which he argues is, as a category, mythical anyway. But it is best to quote the author: 'One scarcely knows what to make of these caricatural permutations of a book that to its author and in its arguments is explicitly anti-essentialist, radically sceptical about all categorical designations such as Orient and Occident, and painstakingly careful about not "defending" or even discussing the Orient and Islam.' This book is a must for anyone interested in the meaning of cultural difference, and it is an exhilarating, sometimes electrifying read.
71 of 85 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Few works are more deserving of the 'Modern Classic' label that Penguin has given this book. Perhaps it is only after nearly twenty year since its first publication that we are able to appreciate the prophetic and uniquely influential nature of Said's insights into the roots of the 'West's' antagonism towards the 'Orient'. For what is, in effect, little more than a book of literary criticism, the ramifications for all areas of scholarly research and investigation are remarkable. On a personal level it is a book that has profoundly affected both my political and academic outlook and forced a re-evaluation of my attitudes (and not just towards the Middle-East) and, more significantly, the underlying deceits or conspiracies of history on which they are founded. I urge every person in a position of power to study this canonical work. That it is hard reading does not detract from but adds to the power of the work; at every moment Said's intimidating (but inspiringly humanistic and humane) scholarship is in evidence and one can only marvel at his analytical dexterity. Those who see the book as repetative and hypocritically reductive have failed to grasp the true substance which is in the criticism and not primarily in the conclusions which are, for the most part, self-evident, as Said himself declares from the outset.
There will, I am sure, continue be numerous wilful misreadings of 'Orientalism' and that it continues to provoke such controversy is a testament to its brilliance. Ignore them and read it.
There will, I am sure, continue be numerous wilful misreadings of 'Orientalism' and that it continues to provoke such controversy is a testament to its brilliance. Ignore them and read it.
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Format:Paperback
Edward Said provides a concise justification for writing this large and complex book - and equally suggests a convincing reason for reading it - in his Afterword: "Orientalism is a study based on the re-thinking of what had for centuries been believed to be an unbridgeable chasm separating East from West. My aim... was not so much to dissipate difference - for who can deny the constitutive role of national as well as cultural differences in the relationships between human beings - but to challenge the notion that difference implies hostility, a frozen reified set of opposed essences, and a whole adversarial knowledge built out of those things."
As might be expected, this is a difficult book - to be read carefully, weighing each word - more a long difficult hike than a gentle cruise; nevertheless a `hike' that in the end leaves one feeling greatly enriched. In dealing with the centuries-old traducing of the people and culture of the East by intellectuals of the West, Said begins with Giambattista Vico's observation "...that men make their own history, that what they can know is what they have made," extending this with a detailed analysis of the writings of western historians, travel writers and politicians about `the Orient' which began in a systematic way with Napoleon's conquest of Egypt in 1798. Said is first and foremost a literary theorist and critic, however, and much of the pleasure in reading this book comes from his profound knowledge of the European literary background in which the orientalist theme can be traced to Dante, and perhaps even as far back as Aeschylus.
The body of Said's work is a fascinating exposition of the opinions of 19th century writers on the `orient' as different as the scientific philologist Renan, who never went there, and the romantic poets Nerval and Flaubert who traveled there in search of the "fabulously exotic and antique". Perhaps one of the most startling passages quotes Karl Marx's apparent approval of the cruelty and destructiveness of colonialism on the grounds that, while it was willfully destroying the ancient forms of civilization, causing a social revolution in Hindustan "actuated only by the vilest interests," for him the real issue was: "...whatever may have been the crimes of England she was the unconscious tool of history in bringing about that revolution."
We are indeed fortunate that we have the consciousness of Said as an antidote to all such blatant instrumentalism. Perhaps his greatest insight, echoing Nietzsche, is that Orientalism is a "system of representations" whose "truths... are embodied in language, and what is the truth of language... but a mobile army of metaphors, metonyms and anthropomorphisms - in short, a sum of human relations, which have been enhanced, transposed and embellished poetically and rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and obligatory to a people; truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that this is what they are."
As the pieces are once again thrown in the air in those territories we refer to as `The Middle East,' it seems more than ever necessary to re-examine the illusionary canons. We can wish for no better guide than Edward Said.
As might be expected, this is a difficult book - to be read carefully, weighing each word - more a long difficult hike than a gentle cruise; nevertheless a `hike' that in the end leaves one feeling greatly enriched. In dealing with the centuries-old traducing of the people and culture of the East by intellectuals of the West, Said begins with Giambattista Vico's observation "...that men make their own history, that what they can know is what they have made," extending this with a detailed analysis of the writings of western historians, travel writers and politicians about `the Orient' which began in a systematic way with Napoleon's conquest of Egypt in 1798. Said is first and foremost a literary theorist and critic, however, and much of the pleasure in reading this book comes from his profound knowledge of the European literary background in which the orientalist theme can be traced to Dante, and perhaps even as far back as Aeschylus.
The body of Said's work is a fascinating exposition of the opinions of 19th century writers on the `orient' as different as the scientific philologist Renan, who never went there, and the romantic poets Nerval and Flaubert who traveled there in search of the "fabulously exotic and antique". Perhaps one of the most startling passages quotes Karl Marx's apparent approval of the cruelty and destructiveness of colonialism on the grounds that, while it was willfully destroying the ancient forms of civilization, causing a social revolution in Hindustan "actuated only by the vilest interests," for him the real issue was: "...whatever may have been the crimes of England she was the unconscious tool of history in bringing about that revolution."
We are indeed fortunate that we have the consciousness of Said as an antidote to all such blatant instrumentalism. Perhaps his greatest insight, echoing Nietzsche, is that Orientalism is a "system of representations" whose "truths... are embodied in language, and what is the truth of language... but a mobile army of metaphors, metonyms and anthropomorphisms - in short, a sum of human relations, which have been enhanced, transposed and embellished poetically and rhetorically, and which after long use seem firm, canonical, and obligatory to a people; truths are illusions about which one has forgotten that this is what they are."
As the pieces are once again thrown in the air in those territories we refer to as `The Middle East,' it seems more than ever necessary to re-examine the illusionary canons. We can wish for no better guide than Edward Said.
Would you like to see more reviews about this item?
Were these reviews helpful?
Let us know
Most Recent Customer Reviews
One of the founding texts of `post-colonialist' theory
First published in 1978, Said's text is a sustained and sometimes controversial expression of the way in which the `Orient' has been put to work as a cultural term not so much... Read more
Published 3 months ago by Roman Clodia
Without doubt an important read but....
....as several reviewers point out there are gaps, one being feminism one which Reine Lewis attempts to address, as does Spivak and others!!!!! Read more
Published 6 months ago by Bobby Moon
Orientalism
This is an absolute must in any colonial and postcolonial literature student's library, as well as anyone who's remotely interested in cultural, psychological and literary studies. Read more
Published 8 months ago by Crushed~Pink~Silk
Ordered Book Not Received
The ordered book "Orientalism" by Edward W Said was shipped on March 07 (from World of Books LTD) but has not yet arrived. Today' s date is May 7. I live in Israel. Read more
Published 13 months ago by Reuven Berman Kadim
A comment on this particular edition
The status of Orientalism as a Modern Classic is not in doubt: it is a stunning work and one of the most important books of the twentieth century. Read more
Published 18 months ago by harhol
Patient zero for the collapse of rigour in Middle East Studies
Firstly, one needs to say this about Said - he a great wordsmith. He has a fantastic command of the english language and whatever you may think of him - and i am clearly not a fan... Read more
Published on 1 Jun 2010 by Danny of Arabia
A masterpiece
This book is not about blaming the west for what is going on in the world or it is not about the Israeli Palestian conflict. Read more
Published on 8 Dec 2009 by Ozgur Polat
Few books are as vital as this one for understanding politics today.
I don't think that there is a lot to add to the reviews which praise this book.
How 'The West' sees others, especially Islam and Muslims, is so central to current world... Read more
How 'The West' sees others, especially Islam and Muslims, is so central to current world... Read more
Published on 27 April 2009 by Germinal
Absolute classic
Read to get an in depth idea of why we are where we are in the "Middle East"
Published on 6 April 2009 by M. S. Kennedy
Good, but....
The book is good I suppose. After all a classic. A standard work.
But it's seventies writing: superfluous, too elaborate, tiresome. Read more
But it's seventies writing: superfluous, too elaborate, tiresome. Read more
Published on 19 Mar 2009 by Staffhorst
Listmania!
Look for similar items by category
Feedback
- Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?
- I am the Author, and I want to comment on my book.
- I am the Publisher, and I want to comment on this book.
