"Nothing is not, in fact, a problem. Nothing isn't anything. Nothing just isn't" Robert Green writes. In his wickedly funny and enlightening book, Nothing Matters, he traces the birth of nothing from the concept of zero until the Arab numerals with its zero replaced the Roman numerals without it. Lively outlining the Church's opposition to the idea of zero (for it equates the heresy of nothingness) and how Pacioli (a humorless Franciscan monk) and his friend Leonardo da Vinci, slipped the idea of nothing into an acceptable legitimacy. After expounding the problems zero caused the Church, and vice versa - note that after 1 BC was 1 AD (no "0") Green discusses how zero was separated from nothing, and then proceeds to discuss how nothing works - in the arts, in religion, and finally, in philosophy. Quoting Pirsig from his "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance": If you talk about it you are always lying, and if you don't talk about it no one knows it is there." Nothing spread all over art world. Yves Klein held an exhibition of nothing -that was in 1958 - it consisted of an empty gallery. He was quoted, arrogantly stating, "I have discovered the void." In 2001, Martin Creed added lights that flashed on and off in an empty room - and won the Turner Prize. John Turner, whose abstract paintings such as "The Scarlet Sunset" was described by William Hazlitt as "All is without form and void. Someone said of his landscapes that they were pictures of nothing, and very like." Indeed, minimalism as an art form was a way in which artists had hoped to achieve nothingness. After the Mona Lisa was stolen in 1911, more people rushed to see the empty space where the painting used to be than the painting when it was there.
We are regaled with story after story about nothing in art when Green switches back to religion. With the thousands of religions, Green tells us, they all have nothing in common - literally. For faiths, "nothing is from where everything began." And so, Green tells us, Pope Pius XII opened a scientific conference in 1951 by declaring that the "Big Bang" theory bore witness to the existence of God describing (the Pope, that is) that from nothingness burst forth light - as God had said (as the Bible says) "Let there be light". Green believed that the scientific audience probably kept a discreet silence for he assumed that they would have realized as Green does, that the Papal pronouncement assumed that God existed. From Christianity to Buddhism, to Pantheism, and Hinduism, nothing works. He discusses the paradox in the Protestant work ethic - the closer we get to God the smaller, and closer we get to God; yet we are told that it is from nothing that everything becomes, and in this way, coming from nothing, we get closer to God the more we know and understand God. Life, it seems, is nothing without death. So Green has a lot to talk about death and nothingness.
That brings us to the closing chapter in which Green discusses how philosophers - from Parmenides and Aristotle to Descartes and Berkeley - struggle with emptiness and vacuum. Here Green had fun with the Berkeley tree-in-the-forest. George Berkeley posed this question: "If a tree fell in the forest and no one heard it, did the tree make a sound?" Sensing annoyance to the un-philosophical minds amongst us, Green poked further, "If a tree fell in the forest and no one knew about it, did the tree fall?" Well, as Green writes at the end of his book, "Nothing is impossible." Green attempts to draw a distinction between "Nothing" (absence of everything) and "Nothingness" (absence of something) and concludes that "since 'nothingness' is the absence of something, it is not absolute...Silence is an example of nothingness." The problem he says, is with "nothing". It's impossible to talk about or show. After he explains the mysteries of religious actions arising from the fear of "nothing" and the exasperations of philosophers over the same, he leaves his readers, panting, and full of nothing.