David Peace has carved himself a niche in contemporary English fiction, by taking real events and turning them into intensely personal and disturbing narratives. In the process he has proved himself to be a stylish and highly distinctive writer. True, his work can be an acquired taste and at times veers into the obscure, but there aren't many writers at work today who have such a personally developed voice.
1980 is the third part of his acclaimed Red Riding Quartet, set in the north of England between 1974 and 1983. Like the books before it, 1980 is set in a world of corruption and violence, and like the previous two installments features a protagonist struggling with the horror of the reality before him whilst battling his own personal demons.
Peter Hunter is an Assistant Chief Constable in Manchester, sent over to Leeds to ostensibly help in the search for the Yorkshire Ripper, but also to critically study the investigations that have gone before.
As in all of the quartet a familiar cast of characters weave in and out of the plot, Bob Craven, The Dawson family, Maurice Jobson, Jack Whitehead, and their actions in the first two books have repercussions here.
Anyone who has read 1974 and 1977 will recognise the frenetic pace, the intensity of the internal monologue and the visceral, violent subject matter. This, more than the others can stand alone as a piece of fiction. Although it would help to have an understanding of the whole set you could pick this novel up and appreciate it as a singular novel.
To me though, this is the most accomplished out of 1974, 1977 and 1980. Peace seems more in control of his style and story than in the previous books. While he has maintained the hallucinatory style there is more clarity to the subject matter, and although this is not an easy read it is certainly more so than its predecessors. 1977 in particular suffered in this respect, having two narrators and a lack of differentiation between their voices.
1980 feels more restrained, if you could ever refer to Peace's work as restrained. His trademark repetition is used to a brilliant effect, particularly in the breathless, exhilarating finale. In the final third of the book, where his style usually obliterates the content, he expertly crafts a series of twists that never seem contrived, but instead clarify and justify that which has come before.
I finished this book with my jaw on the table and if you are unsure about reading it after struggling through 1974 and 1977, I would strongly urge you to do so. This is a whisker away from being a masterpiece.