This book recalls several theses I have examined where the student compromised what was a shining piece of work by including awkward & unnecessary material with literary pretensions. With judicious editing this would have been one of the better books on Shakespeare studies, just the thing to give the undergrads. But...
As the book's descriptor explains, Holderness directly confronts the at turns irritating, and fascinating, tendency of Shakespeare's biographers and interpreters to apportion different weighting to historical and textual evidence. The result has been a series of conflicting lives of Shakespeare. Stephen Greenblatt, Germaine Greer and Jonathan Bate have all commented on and analytically scrutinised this tendency; but Holderness has separated these biographical approaches into 9 potential master narratives. In this sense he has a worthy project on his hands.
However, his book's seeming intended readership is a student audience, for it does not surpass the individual efforts of Greenblatt, Greer and Bate (it tends to summarise in easily digested form their results in this matter, along with material from James Shapiro and Stanley Wells). General readers who have already digested a reasonable amount of Shakespeare criticism and biography won't find much here that is enlightening or new.
The book's unforgivable flaw are the fictional sections that Holderness has written and tacked after each chapter. This may sound like a good idea, and it was the reason for my purchasing the book. One of the crits on this page says the outcome is much like a postmodern novel where different voices present their view of the central figure. That is way too flattering a description! Unfortunately, these fictional sections are not accomplished, indeed, at moments they are embarrassing to read. Literary mimicry and clever pastiche they simply are not (the "Hemingway" section deserves a resounding gong). Anthony Burgess, who really could write, remains unchallenged.
One technical complaint: the print is very small.