You would think that if you bought a lens marked +1, that is what you would get. In most cases you would, but there is always someone who has to be different. Nikon labels its eyepiece correction lenses according to the total effect, including the -1 in the camera, so what is actually in the packet is a +2 dioptre lens, because two (actual lens) minus one (in camera) equals one (total effect) right? If you want an actual +1 lens, you have to buy one marked 0 (zero)! Obviously Nikon never heard of the Trades Descriptions Act. Not a lot of people know about this weird method of marking, including those in the camera shops I spoke to, Jessops among them. Another thing, Nikon cameras display exposure compensation and exposure error, with positive to the left. Noone else in the world draws any kind of diagram with positive to the left. Why do some people have to go out of their way to be different, even when a world-wide standard has been established for hundreds of years? Of course I had to send the lens back. I did not get an e-mail about it and had to phone, all a big waste of time. It turned out that the reason I did not get an e-mail, was that I had blocked Amazon, because they send me so much spam. The product gets a one star rating (zero is not allowed) because it was useless to me. If it does happen to be what you need, there will be nothing wrong with it. In the end, I bought a pair of +1 glasses from Poundland and cut down a lens to fit.
