Bought with the Nikon D90 body as a DSLR "starter kit", but unlike the DX 18-105 mm VR kit lens the quality of this DX 16-85 mm VR really does justice to the capabilities of the D90. I admit that I was tempted by the all-singing, all-dancing Nikon DX 18-200 mm VR, but..... well, read on.
I intend to keep this 16-85 mm lens on the camera 90 % of the time, for general use outdoors, usually in good light. So far, the images it captures at all focal lengths are superb. It will accompany me on walks, mountain scrambles, holidays, visits, events, around the home..... in fact I might even take it to bed I like it so much.
For my money, this is the ideal general-purpose zoom lens to partner the D90.
- For mountain scenery I need the extra 7 degrees field of view this lens gives, compared with the realistic alternatives, which all have a minimum focal length of 18 mm.
- The D90 with DX 16-85 mm VR attached is compact enough to fit into a medium-sized holster, while in the hand the combination feels reassuringly solid and perfectly balanced (which helps when you are perched on a narrow ledge).
- This lens features VR II, a great aid when most shots are going to be hand-held. The first 200 exposures have convinced me how well Nikon's latest VR system works. In daylight it seems nigh on infallible.
- Outdoors I don't (yet) need a high speed pro lens, which would cost and weigh twice as much.
- This lens has a steel mount, not plastic as on the kit lens, plus a rubber seal around the mount to keep out dust and moisture.
- The zoom ring is certainly firm in operation, but is also smooth and controllable. I can't see lens creep becoming an issue. Autofocus works quickly and quietly.
So why did I not go for the stablemate of this lens, the DX 18-200 mm VR? It's popular, well reviewed and with the obvious advantage of a longer reach seems the more obvious choice for walkaround photography.
My reasons:
- When folded up the 18-200 mm is about 18 mm longer and 75 g heavier. Not much, but these do make a difference to portability on the hill.
- Having used and dearly loved a 24 mm F2.8 lens with my film SLR, I wanted the equivalent width of angle offered by the DX 16-85 mm. The difference between that and a 28/27 mm (DX 18 mm) is appreciable.
- I admit to being just a tad sceptical that anyone can make an 11 x zoom lens without incurring optical or mechanical problems somewhere along the line.
- If and when I get into wildlife photography with the D90, I'll set out armed with a longer zoom lens such as Nikon's DX 70-300 mm VR.
I'm very happy with my choice. The DX 16-85 mm on the D90 seems to me a great way to get into digital SLR photography.