Trade in Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle (Continuum Impacts): 27 for an Amazon Gift Card of up to £6.65, which you can then spend on millions of items across the site. Trade-in values may vary (terms apply). Learn more
Paperback: 282 pages
Publisher: Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.; New Ed edition (7 April 2005)
This is an extremely valuable book for students of Nietzsche. Particularly recommended are the exposition of the eternal return - as a thought that selects the best, and as the thought that transcends the illusion of conscious goals (or allows its transcendence)- and the excavation of Nietzsche's last letters for threads of his earlier thought. The book treats Nietzsche's thinking pathologically, in such a way as he intended to write himself - of himself and of others.
A reservation: Klossowski may go off the rails in considering Nietzschean tropes and modern societies. For example, he takes what appears to be a Marxist-influenced position on the modern age: there is a 'strangeness' to modern society for all its inhabitants (alienation, surely is the idea here). Klossowski claims this is not accounted for in Nietzsche's distinction between overmen and the last men - masters and sensually-satisfied drones. This seems suspiciously like an attempt to sneak in a slave morality - a concern for the plight of the masses - and to say that Nietzsche's problematic could only be solved in a world where such strangeness was overcome by all. I doubt very much whether the 'strangeness' is a phenomenon Nietzsche would wish to recognize, relying as it seems to on a materialistic view of our experience. I'm not sure that his idea of the increasing perfection of the pleasure-economy could not account for such a phenomenon were it to exist (outside of ressentiment-filled bourgeois, bourgeois-hating intellectuals). I certainly do not think he would give two hoots for the plight of the 'rabble'. One has to be aware of the spread of the Marxist sickness after the liberation in France.
Difficult to digest in one sitting akin to Deleuze and Guattari with its obtuseness. Takes the eternal return as the main theme. Not sure if Friedrich meant it literally or metaphorically. The eternal return is an idea to live each moment to the max not in terms of squeezing every piece of dionysian frenzy but ensuring the quality is maintained.
Klossowski seems to think he meant it as a reality which would undermine Heraclitis and the meaning of flux; who is to know we are not already living the return? This leads to an iron determininism the opposite of what he was saying- we have thousands of choices every moment but are constrained by culture expectation and peers. If we are trapped in a groundhog day then this entails living everymoment trapped in an endless repeat leading to exhaustion and surrender. Nietzche wanted liberation, so the eternal return must always be metaphorical rather than a reality.
The chapter on his illness brought home how sick he was when he wrote, each sentence was wrenched from him and he went into some form of stupor afterwards. The letters detailed in the book bring home the energy expended in delving into himself. I am not sure as Klossowski states the two are intertwined. Nietzsche's illness seems to have been created when he was younger and maintained as an adult. It has no obvious causes and had certain elements of psycho-somatic except its effects were real. This seems to point to cataclysmic trauma as a child and adolescent.
His solitary life entailed deep thought and he dredged into himself to sharpen the barbs aimed at Christianity and anything that enslaved man or him. As he said philosophy is based on the personal choices and his attack arose from his senses. His connection to others transcended his realm.Read more ›
Was this review helpful to you?
It takes an extraordinary mind, like that of Klossowski, to face the truth about Eternal Return as primarily a mad idea. It sprang from Nietzsche's lived experience in early August of 1881 and left an indelible imprint on his soul and on his entire oeuvre. One might say that for the rest of his (ostensibly) sane life he was trying to come to terms with it. At first he thought of turning it into a scientific doctrine (see chapter 5 of the book), then he poeticised into `Zarathustra'. But the Medusa of madness never lessened her petrifying hold on his soul; ultimately she prevailed. The originality and courage of Klossowski cannot be overemphasised, and he stands almost alone. Far too many PhDs have been awarded to those who tried to sanitise Eternal Return, followed by many appointments to the chairs of philosophy. And yet, the emperor has no clothes! One can be a great, insightful genius and come up with an idea that is close to delusion. If you wish to follow this unusual, poetic and compassionate line of interpretation also read Ernst Bertram's 'Nietzsche: Attempt at a Mythology'. Be prepared to join the club of disinherited minds, though.
Was this review helpful to you?
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on Amazon.com (beta)
16 of 19 people found the following review helpful
Well worth the effort to understand.2 Sept. 2007
- Published on Amazon.com
Review by Douglas Kellner Homepage:[...] Curriculum Vitae:[...]
The translation of Pierre Klossowski's _Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle_ finally provides an English-speaking audience with access to one of the most influential texts of the French Nietzsche tradition. First published in France in 1969, Klossowski's book consummated over three decades of intense work and discussion of Nietzsche's most enigmatic and original ideas. Klossowski began his Nietzsche studies in the 1930s, working with Bataille and the legendary College de Sociologie, which resulted in a series of important studies, culminating in _Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle_, which Foucault described in a letter to Klossowski as "the greatest book of philosophy I have read in addition to Nietzsche himself" (cited in the "Translator's Preface," vii). Deeply influencing Foucault, Deleuze, Lyotard, and other major French Nietzscheans, Klossowski's work remains a seminal text of the contemporary French reading of Nietzsche.
Several major themes inform _Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle_. The text opens with an original reading of Nietzsche's semiotic of impulses, a theme that runs through his work and which strongly influenced his generation. Whereas Saussure's semiotic was an Apollonian semiotic of language interpreted as a formal system of difference, Klossowski's semiotic is a Dionysian one in which impulses break through conventional forms of thought, generate phantasms and simulacra, reinscribe received ideas, and produce new modes of seeing and living. Klossowski interrogates the relationship between impulses, ideas, memory, intellect, and other categories, disclosing Nietzsche's unique philosophical perspectives and questioning of major philosophical categories which are displaced, deconstructed, and in some cases demolished in relation to Nietzsche's mediations on impulses and related conceptions of instinct, phantasms, and simulacra.
Klossowski also relates Nietzsche's semiotic of impulses to his crucial philosophical experiences and intuitions. Klossowski reads Nietzsche's doctrine of the eternal recurrence as a translation into language of his most profound experiences which further put in question major philosophical concepts such as the self, life, fate, necessity, causality, and other key conceptions in the Western philosophical arsenal. Nietzsche emerges in this reading as both a major deconstructive philosopher whose work overturns previous philosophies, as well as cultural forms like religion, morality, and politics, and a highly original constructive philosopher who provides wholly unique and explosive philosophical perspectives.
Klossowski himself develops a concept of the "vicious circle" to point to the scandal of the doctrine of eternal recurrence, how it confounds rational and scientific explanation, and how it forces one to become another self with another vision of the world to accept it. Klossowski shows how the doctrine causes tensions with other of Nietzsche's ideas and how its very existence led Nietzsche to question his own sanity and to seek scientific validation of the concept. The inability, indeed impossibility, of such a proof led Nietzsche, in Klossowski's interpretation, to henceforth develop two opposing philosophical perspectives: an exoteric one based on his more accessible ideas such as self-overcoming, the transvaluation of values, and his affirmative Dionysian philosophy, and a more esoteric one based on literal acceptance of the eternal recurrence, the vicious circle, an idea that Nietzsche believed would divide humanity in half, bifurcated along the lines of those who did and did not accept this momentous idea. The esoteric teaching, in Klossowski's view, was for select individuals to become "masters of the earth" and in fact produced Nietzschean cults who dwelled on and within his most secret teachings.
Throughout his study, Klossowski interrogates the meaning and effects of Nietzsche's illness, suffering, madness, and devastatingly tragic life for his thought. His text intersperses long selections from Nietzsche's works, especially the unpublished notebooks and his letters, with Klossowski's extended philosophical commentary, woven into a complex tapestry of explication and interpretation. The result is a highly original reading of Nietzsche which strongly influenced his contemporaries and continues to be of interest today.
Klossowski's book can be profitably read alongside Geoff Waite's _Nietzsche's Corps/e_, perhaps the most interesting book on Nietzsche of the last decade. Waite argues that Nietzsche provides the dominant ideological-philosophical-cultural matrix of the twentieth century whose only contender is communism and urges all Marxists and progressives to beware of Nietzsche's influence which Waite believes to be pernicious. Defending Althusser against Nietzsche (and Heidegger who Waite sees as the most consequent and dangerous Nietzschen), he pursues to the limit Bataille's bon mot that "Nietzsche's is the only one outside of communism" (5, passim).
Wishing to free the Left from the taint of Nietzscheanism, or what he calls a "Nietzschoid" Leftism, Waite argues that Left-Nietzscheanism is a contradiction in terms, an impossible synthesis of warring antagonists. Wishing to free the Troika of Marx-Freud-Nietzsche from the influence, indeed what he sees as the hegemony, of Nietzsche, Waite sets out to raise questions concerning both Nietzsche's thought and influence. The result is a highly original and extremely provocative reading of Nietzsche and his influence full of exhilarating critique, spirited polemic, surprising connections, and highly original insights.
While one might be put off by Waite's highly tendentious political reading, the text is a stupendous work of scholarship, surpassing by far the many books on Nietzsche's influence. Indeed, this book is unlike any in the highly academic and often sterile ranks of Nietzsche-scholarship. Containing almost as many footnotes as text, the book provides an excursion into a multiplicity of competing readings of Nietzsche, citing his manifold effects, and the ways that Nietzsche's "corpse," his life and body of texts, produces a Nietzschen "corps" that does ideological battle in the service of his ideas, or are passively, and perhaps subliminally, shaped by Nietzsche's ideas to think and act in ways programmed by Nietzsche himself.
Like Klossowski, Waite wants to distinguish between an esoteric and exoteric Nietzsche, but unlike his French predecessor Waite wishes to polemicize against the esoteric Nietzsche. He claims that Nietzsche devised multiple rhetorical and literary strategies to promote his secret teachings, hid or sugar-coated the more pernicious aspects of his thought such as his defense of slavery, eugenics, euthanasia, or misogyny, and programmed his future reception into the writing of his texts.
After a long rambling preamble where Waite lays his hermeneutical and political cards on the table and spells out the parameters and goals of his project, he takes on some leading Nietzsche interpretations, showing how readers on both the Right and Left fail to see Nietzsche's esoteric philosophy and cunning strategies to make himself the fate of the twentieth century. For Waite, contemporary readers also systematically occlude the more disturbing elements of Nietzsche's thought, underestimate the importance of Nietzsche's unpublished notes and manuscripts for his esoteric teachings, and ignore or are ignorant of the more pernicious effects and consequences of Nietzsche's teaching.
In the most substantive sections of his highly eccentric but lucid text, Waite takes on the readings of Bataille, Derrida, and Klossowski, appreciating their insights, but criticizing their failures to show how Nietzsche's texts actually work and to ignore, or misrepresent, the esoteric teachings. In a long essay on "Esoteric Semiotics," Waite provides his most extensive reading of Nietzsche's writing strategy and program, while his concluding study on "Trasformismo from Gramsci to Dick, or, The Spectacular Technoculture of everyday life" makes a fascinating case for the continued relevance of Nietzsche's writing in the high tech and cybernetic age of the present.
Books by both Nietzsche's defenders and critics show the extent to which his thought remains lively and relevant to the present age. Nietzsche remains one of the more provocative and controversial thinkers and to some extent Waite is correct that we all philosophize and act in the ambience of Nietzsche's thought. It is well-acknowledged by now that there are a tremendous diversity of Nietzsches, that every distinct reading provides another Nietzsche, and that Nietzsche both promoted and facilitated such a fecund reception through his literary strategies and talents. As we enter the next millennium, it continues to be important to read and position oneself in relation to Nietzsche and one of the major challenges of the coming century will be the problem of what to do with this highly explosive and provocative thinker.
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful
Deeply Perplexing18 Mar. 2009
- Published on Amazon.com
Pierre Klossowski's 'Nietzsche and the Vicious Circle' is a very mysterious, albeit rich analysis of some of the more difficult aspect's of Nietzsche's life and work. The research in this book clearly presents a strong grip on Heidegger's Nietzsche lectures,' and readers would be wise to read the later before embarking through this densely conceived text. Klossowski makes a number of brilliant moves here-from his Freudian reading of the doctrine of the eternal recurrence of the same, to his positing of that very doctrine as a 'conspiracy.' Always political and biographical, this study links Nietzsche's experience of madness and ecstasy to the development of eternal return. This is a hauntingly beautiful reexamination of ideas that Nietzsche scholars are all to willing to drop into the dustbin. Daniel Smith's new translation is particularly lucid.