Shop now Shop now Shop now  Up to 50% Off Fashion  Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen with Prime Shop now Shop now

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 3 March 2016
very happy with the service you provide. solid.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 31 January 2009
This is a further 'revised edition' of Sheldrake's earlier 1980's version of similar title.

There is no empirical proof of his various theories and certainly no peer-reviewed scientific evidence. He reminds me of Conan Doyle and another anomaly-researchers; he just loves to dabble in telepathy, "morphic" resonance and alternative notions.

Conversely, proponents of Fourier-type hologram/holonomic hypotheses about brain functions and "holographic universe" theories (viz K Pribram, M Talbot, Denis Gabor et al) might have been excited to see the recent article by Marcus Chown in the Jan 15 2009 edition of New Scientist. Suffice to say, this latter might be evidence for such hypotheses.
But we are an extremely long way from morphic resonance. One suspects such feats of conversion are only viable in portions of the visual cortex of the human brain---Nowhere else. The interaction between intuition, instinct, memory & IQ in the human brain can produce interesting freak events...but Sheldrake's musings currently do not withstand scientific scrutiny.
0Comment|2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 February 2003
Rupert Sheldrake offers a range of views on science and how we experience the world.
Some of his opinions are based on scientific studies and are well documented. Some are based on hypothesis.
He makes a strong statement about belief in possibility leading to the eradication of TB in the West. It's a shame that TB is now a major threat in parts of London and has come back to make his view look naive and ridiculous. It's great to have writers who popularise science and alternative views. Sometimes their great writing style can spread sloppy ideas.
0Comment|6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Customers also viewed these items

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.