Quantity:

More Buying Choices

27 used & new from �9.65

Have one to sell? Sell yours here

Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language

See larger image

Share your own customer images

Publisher: learn how customers can search inside this book.

Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language (Hardcover)

by M Bennett (Author)

5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)

RRP:	�18.50
Price:	�15.73 & this item Delivered FREE in the UK with Super Saver Delivery. See details and conditions
You Save:	�2.77 (15%)
	o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o

In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Amazon.co.uk. Gift-wrap available.

Only 4 left in stock--order soon (more on the way).

Want guaranteed delivery by Friday, November 13? Choose Express delivery at checkout. See Details

20 new from �9.65 7 used from �10.09

Other Editions:	RRP:	Our Price:	Other Offers:
Paperback (1)	�13.50	�9.34	33 used & new from �6.66

Frequently Bought Together

Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought

Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience

by M. R. Bennett

4.6 out of 5 stars (5) �22.44

Freedom and Neurobiology: Reflections on Free Will, Language, and Political Power (Columbia Themes in Philosophy): Reflections on Free Will, Language, ... Power (Columbia Themes in Philosophy)

by John Searle

�8.28

The Emerging Mind: The BBC Reith Lectures 2003

by Vilayanur Ramachandran

4.2 out of 5 stars (6) �5.97

Neurophilosophy at Work

by Paul Churchland

�13.24

Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain

by Antonio Damasio

5.0 out of 5 stars (4) �6.72

› Explore similar items

Product details

Hardcover: 232 pages
Publisher: Columbia University Press; 1 edition (23 Mar 2007)
Language English
ISBN-10: 0231140444
ISBN-13: 978-0231140447
Product Dimensions: 21.3 x 14.5 x 2.5 cm

Average Customer Review: 5.0 out of 5 stars See all reviews (1 customer review)

Amazon.co.uk Sales Rank: 380,861 in Books (See Bestsellers in Books)

Would you like to update product info or give feedback on images?

See Complete Table of Contents

Customers Viewing This Page May Be Interested in These Sponsored Links

(What is this?)

Neuroscience in 24 Hours opens new browser window

RapidLearningCenter.com/Neurosci - Master Neuroscience Course Visually Rich Media Movies Hourly in 24 Hrs

Product Description

Review

"A useful introduction." -- Barry Dainton, Science "Readable and accessible." -- James Sage, Metapsychology "A good introduction to this dynamic subfield." -- Library Journal "[A] rare opportunity to appreciate an encapsulated philosophical debate... Recommended." -- CHOICE

Product Description

In Neuroscience and Philosophy three prominent philosophers and a leading neuroscientist clash over the conceptual presuppositions of cognitive neuroscience. The book begins with an excerpt from Maxwell Bennett and Peter Hacker's Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience (Blackwell, 2003), which questions the conceptual commitments of cognitive neuroscientists. Their position is then criticized by Daniel Dennett and John Searle, two philosophers who have written extensively on the subject, and Bennett and Hacker in turn respond.Their impassioned debate encompasses a wide range of central themes: the nature of consciousness, the bearer and location of psychological attributes, the intelligibility of so-called brain maps and representations, the notion of qualia, the coherence of the notion of an intentional stance, and the relationships between mind, brain, and body.Clearly argued and thoroughly engaging, the authors present fundamentally different conceptions of philosophical method, cognitive-neuroscientific explanation, and human nature, and their exchange will appeal to anyone interested in the relation of mind to brain, of psychology to neuroscience, of causal to rational explanation, and of consciousness to self-consciousness. In his conclusion Daniel Robinson (member of the philosophy faculty at Oxford University and Distinguished Professor Emeritus at Georgetown University) explains why this confrontation is so crucial to the understanding of neuroscientific research. The project of cognitive neuroscience, he asserts, depends on the incorporation of human nature into the framework of science itself. In Robinson's estimation, Dennett and Searle fail to support this undertaking; Bennett and Hacker suggest that the project itself might be based on a conceptual mistake. Exciting and challenging, Neuroscience and Philosophy is an exceptional introduction to the philosophical problems raised by cognitive neuroscience.

See all Product Description

Suggested Tags from Similar Products

(What's this?)

Be the first one to add a relevant tag (keyword that's strongly related to this product)

philosophy

neuroscience

mind

consciousness

cognitive science

What Do Customers Ultimately Buy After Viewing This Item?

	80% buy the item featured on this page: Neuroscience and Philosophy: Brain, Mind, and Language 5.0 out of 5 stars (1) �15.73
	8% buy Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience 4.6 out of 5 stars (5) �22.44
	5% buy Making Up the Mind: How the Brain Creates Our Mental World 4.6 out of 5 stars (7) �13.62
	4% buy The Plastic Mind 5.0 out of 5 stars (3) �6.47

Explore similar items

Customer Reviews

1 Review

5 star:		(1)
4 star:		(0)
3 star:		(0)
2 star:		(0)
1 star:		(0)

Average Customer Review

5.0 out of 5 stars (1 customer review)

Share your thoughts with other customers:

Create your own review

Most Helpful Customer Reviews

13 of 13 people found the following review helpful:

5.0 out of 5 stars Proper excitement over mind-body language, 27 Oct 2008

By	E. R. van Delft "Ren�" (Netherlands) - See all my reviews (REAL NAME)

This brilliant book contains selections from 'Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience' of Maxwell Bennett (neuroscientist) / Peter Hacker (Wittgenstein specialist) and a 'triangle' discussion between these authors and Daniel Dennett and John Searle.
It is common in science to use intentional and phenomenal terms ('thinking', 'feeling', 'deciding') not only for people, but also for parts of people (especially brains and brain parts). According to 'Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience' this is not - as it seems - a matter of handy metaphor, but it reveals a misunderstanding and in the end incoherence of the language used. Talk about human beings and talk about biology are mixed in a way that adds smoke, to say the least.
Searle (as usual, imho) misses the point and keeps repeating that, for example, the foot as we feel it (part of the 'phenomenal body') is 'in our head'. It is just this sort of embarrassing silliness that Bennett and Hacker expose. In this way Searle does not really add to the discussion, but nevertheless he provides a clear illustration of the misunderstanding at stake.
The reaction of Dennett (beautifully written, but maybe a bit too sharp and personally hurt) is much more important. The differences between Bennett/Hacker and Dennett reveal an interesting tension: in what way can or must we stretch the common use of words like 'think', 'interpret', etc. that they provide more insight and not less?
Yes, Bennett and Hacker are right to warn us that you cannot jump to conclusions by using words in inconsistent ways (with clashing criteria or 'rules'). Don't confuse metaphor with explanation. Projecting human properties on body parts can actually hinder our understanding of the way brains work.
Dennett is right that stretching words is an inspiring way to try to make sense of the growing information we have on brain mechanisms. And he makes a point that his vision of sub-agents ('homunculi' with less functionality than the whole, and with appropriately and gradually less reason to be viewed with an 'intentional stance') does give a fascinating model for future research.
This subject can be seen as: how strictly (and how rigidly) Wittgensteinian should we want to be?
There's much to be said for both parties and this discussion alone already contributes to what Bennett and Hacker clearly had in mind: to sharpen our awareness of the words we use and to put full light on the boundaries between profit and distraction, between adding sense and getting under the spell of our own metaphors.

Comment Comment | Permalink | Was this review helpful to you? Yes No (Report this)

Share your thoughts with other customers: Create your own review

› See all customer reviews...

.jsOffDisplayBlock { display: block; } .jsOffDisplayInline { display: inline; } .jsOffVisibility { visibility: visible; } .jsOnDisplayBlock { display: none; } .jsOnDisplayNoneBlock { display: block; } .jsOnDisplayNoneInline { display: inline; } .jsOnDisplayInline { display: none; } .jsOnVisibility { visibility: hidden; } .jqOnDisplayBlock { display: none; } .jqOnDisplayInline { display: none; } .jqOnVisibility { visibility: hidden; } .jqOnDisplayNoneBlock { display: block; } .jqOnDisplayNoneInline { display: inline; }

Customer Discussions

This product's forum

Discussion	Replies	Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight

Active discussions in related forums

Discussion	Replies	Latest Post
politics what happened to the BNP discussion	127	29 minutes ago
politics Cast Iron promise - Cameron	5	9 hours ago
politics "Sour faced little Englanders" - David Cameron	3	1 day ago
politics Would it be so bad if we let Europe run the UK	12	1 day ago
politics Special relationship America and Britain	7	1 day ago
politics This is Politics?????	36	3 days ago
politics Which is better a charismatic leader or the right policies?	9	3 days ago