Start reading The Nativist Prophets of Early Islamic Iran on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Get your Kindle here or start reading now with a free Kindle Reading App.

Deliver to your Kindle or other device


Try it free

Sample the beginning of this book for free

Deliver to your Kindle or other device

Anybody can read Kindle books—even without a Kindle device—with the FREE Kindle app for smartphones, tablets and computers.
The Nativist Prophets of Early Islamic Iran: Rural Revolt and Local Zoroastrianism

The Nativist Prophets of Early Islamic Iran: Rural Revolt and Local Zoroastrianism [Kindle Edition]

Patricia Crone

Print List Price: £19.99
Kindle Price: £12.48 includes VAT* & free wireless delivery via Amazon Whispernet
You Save: £7.51 (38%)
* Unlike print books, digital books are subject to VAT.


Amazon Price New from Used from
Kindle Edition £12.48  
Hardcover £64.34  
Paperback £19.99  
Kindle Summer Sale: Over 500 Books from £0.99
Have you seen the Kindle Summer Sale yet? Browse selected books from popular authors and debut novelists, including new releases and bestsellers. Learn more

Product Description


'Patricia Crone's book has made this battle intelligible and vivid to us, and as real and urgent as if it had happened only yesterday.' The Times Literary Supplement

Product Description

Patricia Crone's book is about the Iranian response to the Muslim penetration of the Iranian countryside, the revolts subsequently triggered there and the religious communities that these revolts revealed. The book also describes a complex of religious ideas that, however varied in space and unstable over time, has demonstrated a remarkable persistence in Iran across a period of two millennia. The central thesis is that this complex of ideas has been endemic to the mountain population of Iran and occasionally become epidemic with major consequences for the country, most strikingly in the revolts examined here and in the rise of the Safavids who imposed Shi'ism on Iran. This learned and engaging book by one of the most influential scholars of early Islamic history casts entirely new light on the nature of religion in pre-Islamic Iran and on the persistence of Iranian religious beliefs both outside and inside Islam after the Arab conquest.

Product details

  • Format: Kindle Edition
  • File Size: 3716 KB
  • Print Length: 585 pages
  • Page Numbers Source ISBN: 110701879X
  • Simultaneous Device Usage: Up to 4 simultaneous devices, per publisher limits
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press (28 Jun 2012)
  • Sold by: Amazon Media EU S.à r.l.
  • Language: English
  • ASIN: B009K2PUD6
  • Text-to-Speech: Enabled
  • X-Ray:
  • Amazon Bestsellers Rank: #488,666 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)
  •  Would you like to give feedback on images?

More About the Author

Discover books, learn about writers, and more.

What Other Items Do Customers Buy After Viewing This Item?

Customer Reviews

There are no customer reviews yet on
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Most Helpful Customer Reviews on (beta) 3.8 out of 5 stars  5 reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Dense But Interesting 23 Aug 2013
By R. Albin - Published on
An impressive work of scholarship in which Crone attempts to reconstruct crucial features of traditional Iranian religion from a close reading of a variety of Arabic, Persian, Chinese, and other texts. The result is considerably more than one would expect as Crone's work reveals a great deal about the history of religion in a broad swath of the Middle East and Central Asia. This is a very scholarly book in several respects. Crone's careful interpretative work clearly provides considerable new insights. Most of the book, however, was written with her fellow specialists in mind and is pretty heavy going for general readers.

For a non-specialist reader like myself, I think there are 3 particularly interesting features. First, Crone shows the remarkably diverse and highly interactive world of religious thought across a broad swathe of time and geographically from the eastern Mediterranean to Central Asia. This includes native Iranian traditions such as those that gave rise to Zoroasterianism, the influence of Platonism and Buddhism, and less familiar traditions such as Manicheanism, and various strains of Gnosticism and Islam. How these diverse traditions interacted is quite interesting. Second, there is interesting discussion of Zoroasterianism in both its official and popular forms - something that will be unfamiliar to many readers. Finally, Crone has some very interesting analysis of the role of popular religion, messianic traditions, and the role of religion in traditional societies and its relation to states. For general readers, this part is probably the most interesting and I wish Crone had incorporated more higher level analysis into the book.

Overall, an important work of scholarship that can probably be read selectively depending on the reader's interests. While I read this book cover to cover, Crone provides a useful outline of the text in her introduction which is a very good guide to how to read the book selectively.
11 of 14 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars An Iranian Blend 21 July 2013
By Hans-Peter Muller - Published on
Up to the so-called Sunni Revival long after the conquest of much of the Islamic World, and foremost Iran, by the Seljuqs in the first half of the 11th century, the religious denomination of Iranians has never been so clear. After the Arabs under caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab had brought the Sasanian empire and its last shah Yazdegerd III to their knees in the battles at al-Qadisiyyah (near the capital Ctesiphon) in 637 and Nahavand (near Hamadan) in 642, Iran's state religion, Zoroastrianism, had not just vanished. Albeit victory of Islam was inevitable at first sight. The rapid Arab conquests after their Prophet Muhammad's sudden demise in 632 took indeed place before the Muslims' holy book, the Qur'an, had been compiled into an official, standardized, version by Uthman ibn Affan in about 650 (as legend tells). So, the conquests of Palestine and Syria in 634-6, Jerusalem and Ctesiphon in 637, and Egypt in 639 had probably little to do with a compelling new religion. One main factor for the rapid success of the Arab conquest of Iran was, of course, the peripheral location of its capital, Ctesiphon, and its early fall and that simple fact is stressed early in Patricia Crone's new book on the "nativist prophets" of the first two centuries after the conquest in Greater Iran.

How did the Iranians respond to forcible imposition of yet immature Islamic ideas, which, by definition, blend those of the older religions Judaism and Christianity? Well, they rebelled. But not so fast.

The Revolts

Much commenced with the Persian general Abu Muslim Khorasani (d. 755) and Islam's third civil war (749/50) when members of the Hashimiyya in Khorasan revolted against the ruling Umayyads. Abu Muslim's origin, whose original Persian name was Behzadan, remains obscure, though. During the rebellion against the last Umayyad caliph Marwan II, Abu Muslim was sent to Khorasan by the leader of the Abbasid rebellion, Ibrahim bin Muhammad, where he headed the uprising since 747. When Abu-l Abbas as-Saffah was proclaimed first Abbasid caliph in 749, Abu Muslim assumed office as governor in Khorasan where he gained almost legendary status among Muslims (both Shi'tes and Sunnis), Zoroastrians, Jews and Christians alike. Relations with the caliph and his successor deteriorated, though. Abu Muslim was eventually ordered to Madain by caliph al-Mansur when he unavailingly tried to appoint Abu Muslim governor in Egypt and Syria. There he was killed and his mutilated body thrown into the river Tigris in 755.

The Iranian revolts took mainly place before and after this third civil war, when the Abbasid Abu-l Abbas as-Saffah (the "blood shedder") had eventually defeated the troops of Marwan II on the banks of the Great Zab river in Northern Iraq. Times were troubled indeed. Before and after, Alids had tried to rebel as well. In Kufa, Zayd ibn Ali, son of the fourth Shi'a Imam Ali ibn Husain Zayn al-Abidin, revolted in 739/40 and was killed in a battle with the Umayyad governor there. His son Yahiya ibn Zayn continued his father's struggle. He went to Khorasan through Mada'in and remained in disguise in Balkh until he was arrested. He was imprisoned for some time until he was able to escape after the death of Umayyad Caliph Hashim ibn Abd al-Malik with many Shi'ites from Khorasan gathering around him. He headed toward Nishapur and engaged there in a battle with its governor, Umar ibn Zurarah al-Qasri, whose army he defeated. In 743 he was wounded in the forehead at Jawzjan and killed at the battle arena at the age of only 18 years while his forces dispersed. Crone mentions sources (p. 104) in her new book as to which Yahiya might have been a descendant of another propagandist in Transoxiana after Abu Muslim's killing in 755, Ishaq al-Turk. Whether Ishak "had allegedly fled from the Umayyads to Turkish Transoxiana and later adopted Muslimi beliefs by way of camouflage" (taqiyya?) is questionable. Crone writes, "It probably reflects the fact that Yahiya b. Zayd was a hero to many of those who venerated Abu Muslim, for Yahiya was a member of the same holy family that Abu Muslim had worked for, and both had been victimised by the `Arabs' who did not understand what their own prophet had preached," and "One sub-group of the Ishaqiyya claimed that their imam had fled from the Umayyads and the Abbasids to the land of the Turks, where he was now staying and whence the mahdi would come forth, speaking only Turkish. Their Ishaq sounds like our refugee from Sunbadh's (see below) army mixed up with Yahiya b. Zayd, the refugee from the Umayyads." Also Abdallah ibn Mu'awiya, Zayd's cousin and Yahiya's uncle, and his followers, the Harbiyya/Janahiyya, rebelled after both had been killed. Ibn Mu'awiya's revolt was joined by the Zaydiyya and even Kharijites. He was killed on behalf of the Abbasids in 748 just by Abu Muslim, to whom he had fled in hope for cooperation, while imprisoned in Herat.

Abu Muslim's killing in 755 sparked further revolts. One of the insurgents in the Jibal was his close friend Sunbadh (d. 755), a former member of the Iranian aristocracy and now leader of the Muslimiyya. He rebelled in Rayy in 755 but was defeated after only 70 days. Sunbadh denied Abu Muslim's death and was inclined to deify his friend. And he must have been the founder of the Khurramites, a sect and political movement which has its roots in proto-socialist Mazdakism, a heresy re-introduced in the early 6th century by a Persian reformer and religious activist, Mazdak. Khurramis were Shi'ites but most of their doctrines were those of the Zoroastrians.

As Crone stresses Khurramism was not an intrinsically subversive or rebellious creed but rather friendly and pacifist. Anyway, in Azerbaijan it was the utterly cruel and bloodthirsty Khurramite leader Babak (d. 838) who rebelled against the Abbasids under caliph al-Ma'mun, and his rebellion lasted for more than 20 years. Al-Mamun's successor Abu Ishak al-Mut'asim appointed in 835 his general Haydar bin Kavus Afshin to fight Babak and his Khurramites in Azerbaijan. Afshin got hold of him only two years later. Babak was executed under torture in 838.

Further to the East, in Sogdia in Transoxiana, it was another ethnically Persian insurgent who went into hiding a couple of years after Abu Muslim had been killed and started a rebellion (around 768), al-Muqanna (d. 779?). It might even be that he also had been a commander under Abu Muslim. His original name was Hashim al-Hakim, or Ata, but he became famous under the name he gave himself, al-Muqanna, or the veiled one. Al-Muqanna claimed to be a prophet, or even re-incarnation of God, a role which had passed to him via Abu Muslim, Ali and Muhammad. He used magic to impress his followers, the Mubayyida. When besieged in his fortress he committed suicide. He, too, was a member of the Khurramiya. While other Khurramite followers at that time wore red clothes, those of Al-Muqanna wore white in opposition to the black clothes of the Abbasids.

Khurramism and Beyond

Albeit an orthodox version of Zoroastrianisms had been re-established as sort of state religion under the Sasanids (224-651 CE), there had never been only Zoroastrians in Iran. As Patricia Crone writes in her preface,

"This is a book about the Iranian response to the Muslim penetration of the Iranian countryside, the revolts that the Muslims triggered there, and the religious communities that these revolts revealed. It is also a book about a complex of religious ideas that, however varied in space and unstable over time, has shown remarkable persistence in Iran over a period of two millennia. The central thesis of the book is that this complex of ideas has been endemic to the mountain population of Iran and has occasionally become epidemic with major consequences for the country, most strikingly in the revolts examined here and in the rise of the Safavids who imposed Shi'ism on Iran."

While the first part of Crone's book entertains and summarizes what had been published before, in particular by Elton L. Daniel, the second part deals with specific religions and their heresies and beliefs which met in pre-Islamic and early-Islamic Iran, including and with a focus on Khurramism.

The name of the Khurramis is derived from Persian khurram, "happy, cheerful". It is a blend with much (albeit utterly heretic) Zoroastrian belief in it. Antinomianism, cosmological principles of light and darkness, repeat reincarnation of any creatures. Cleanliness and purification. Non-violence, except when raising the banner of revolt; including avoidance of killing animals and vegetarian diet, or shockingly (for Muslims) only allowing carrion. Or equally scandalous, sharing of women at least by mutual consent. Drinking wine. In brief, freedom of enjoying all kinds of pleasure as long as nobody was harmed.

For the apparent panpsychism of the Khurramis, i.e. their conviction that everything is alive and endowed with sould, spirit, or mind; and likewise their strong belief in reincarnation biblical-type monotheism was intolerably reductionist. Crone explains (p. 273ff),

"From the Khurrami point of view the Christians were better than the Jews and Muslims in that they accepted the idea of God incarnating himself in human beings and also spoke much about the holy spirit. The Gnostics were even better, and best of all were the Platonists, whether pagan, Gnostic, Christian, or Muslim. It is not for nothing than Platonism became an integral part of Iranian Islam."

The other major characteristic of Khurramism is alienation, in particular political which started with their unhappy encounters with Muslim society when Iran was colonized, postrevolutionary violence, ruined lives.

"Everybody else had followed imams of error; only they (the Khurramis) knew that the guardianship of the Prophet's message had passed to Abu Muslim or Khidash (a Hashimite missionary in Khurasan, who had been repudiated for having adopted the Khurramite heresy already in 737), who had been betrayed and killed by the powers that be. The Muslimiyya would curse the killers and weep over their martyrs, clearly identifying their dire fate with their own. Eventually they enrolled the Persian kings as imams, and so implicitly as martyrs too. The followers of Abdallah b. Mu'awiya were also defined by loyalty to a martyred hero. So too, of course, were many Shi'ites who were not Khurramis and who wept over al-Husayn. In all cases the evil powers were humans, usually the caliph and his supporters, the `Arabs' who called themselves Muslims, and no attempt seems to have been made to retell the story of the evil powers on a cosmic scale, as an account of the creation. In line with this, what the devotees of martyred heroes dreamed about was not escape from the world, but rather vengeance: the hero would come back, or a descendant of his would do so, and he would kill the oppressors, purify the world, and restore the oppressed minority to power."

As Crone notes (p. 275), like Shi'te extremism, Khurramism was meant to insulate people, "building religious walls around their communities when the mountains no longer sufficed." The Muslim conquistadors reduced the countryside to urban subservience and imposed their single transcendent God which was intolerable for the mountaineers. Crone (p. 276),

"They opted out in the name of the nearest they could find to their own religion in Islam, meaning Shi'ism stretched to the limits to accomodate their views. They did so as Khurramis, as Qarmatis and other kinds of Ismailis, above all the Nizaris, and eventually as members of all the quasi-Islamic communities that appeared in regions from the Jibal to Anatolia after the Mongol invasions. But it was not until the Safavid conquest of Iran that the mountaineers got their revenge, with consequences that are still with us."

In her preface, Crone recommends readers to start with chapter 1 which introduces the actors and sets the scene for Khurranism which it dealt with extensively in chapter 2. It's a good one. As usual, her new text is heavy stuff, not easy to digest. Crone's dense writing is demanding, and quoting so numerous hardly accessible Arabic, Persian, Pahlavi, Greek, Syriac, Buddhist, Manichaean primary sources, including Middle Iranian texts recovered from Central Asia and Central Asian archaeology is stunning and highly admirable. In chapter 3, Crone tries to systematically examine specific marital patterns and reproductive strategies discernible behind Muslim accusations of `wife-sharing'. While in the eastern part of Iran fraternal polyandry was indeed widely practiced, in the west it was temporary co-marriage, something which is custom even in present-day Iran (nikah al-mut'ah). Anyway, when and wherever Muslims invaded the former Sasanian empire they brought with them a new marital regime and denounced alternative customes as barbarian and incest, a form of, well, pre-modern Orientalism. What closingly follows is a description of the role of sharing wifes and property in the formation of an ancient communist utopian ideal, namely Mazdakism, in Sasanian Iran.
5.0 out of 5 stars Five Stars 10 July 2014
By shaul shaked - Published on
Format:Kindle Edition
important and lucid study of early Islamic history
5.0 out of 5 stars Brilliant! 17 Jun 2014
By Farzana - Published on
Format:Kindle Edition|Verified Purchase
Anyone interested in this time, region or topic, should add this brilliant original book to their academic library. Additionally, Patricia Crone can write well, so at certain points, I lifted my head from the page and asked, "Why hasn't someone made a movie out of this?" In my lifetime of extensive academic reading, this is has not been a common reaction. Usually, I get another double espresso latte as the turgid historical landscape unfurls,but with Crone, I yelp and gurgle, and mutter, "Well, I never knew that!" until the other patrons of the coffee shop ease slowly away from me.

Yes, she assumes you have some basic background, yes, she toddles off into all sorts of unexpected directions, yes, one might quibble with translations or assumptions, or violently object to interpretations, but she kicks starts even the jaded academic into reassessing, pawing through references, and even - I blush and shudder - hitting Wiki, Get this book, dear reader in or out of the field, and get it now.
9 of 31 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars Crone being.... Crone 18 Sep 2013
By Hayy ibn Yaqdhan - Published on
After licking my lips and nervously awaiting this book's arrival through ILL from another library, I made sure to go back and read what I had been able to obtain from reliable and judicious sources concerning the manifold sectarian movements that broke off during the first few centuries of Islam: nothing. No one has been able to account for what led to revolts in the wake of revolts in the wake of revolts that gave us schismatic groups like the Zafraniyya (were they the radical Shi'a who believed Imam Ali cultivated Saffron, the auspicious herb used in all Iranian cooking?!?). What did two days going through Crone's new tome offer me that no one has been able to provide before? Nothing. No, nothing. There are facts in this books, but unfortunately they are strung together in the most mind-bogglingly horrendous fashion. Crone can read documents, but a historian must possess some storytelling ability and self reflexive skepticism when weighing what information to utilize effectively to tell a story about people and traditions that belong in the same narrative. Apparently I was hoping for too much. She claims that "communism" was practiced in medieval Iran. What's a neologism? Also- you know that essentialized spirit that orientals have for, well, being oriental? Apparently they still got it (congrats!) and it has caused certain mountain-dwelling Iranians to rise up again and again since the dawn of time. For any NELC and NES types out there- Crone uses Ibn Tahir al-Baghdadi's (d. 1037) al-Farq bayna 'l-firaq as a reference work to explain Muslim sects without supposing that, hey, perhaps al-Baghdadi isn't as objective as the rest of us. Nope. It just didn't occur to her. So let's not be like Crone, let's ask whether she is being objective in anything that she writes, ever. This one's for the heap.
Were these reviews helpful?   Let us know

Customer Discussions

This product's forum
Discussion Replies Latest Post
No discussions yet

Ask questions, Share opinions, Gain insight
Start a new discussion
First post:
Prompts for sign-in

Search Customer Discussions
Search all Amazon discussions

Look for similar items by category